致幻剂对阿片类药物使用障碍的影响:临床前研究的范围综述。

IF 6.2 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Alejandra Pulido-Saavedra, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Razi Kitaneh, Eric J Nunes, Colleen Fogg, Melissa C Funaro, Jeremy Weleff, Anahita Bassir Nia, Gustavo A Angarita
{"title":"致幻剂对阿片类药物使用障碍的影响:临床前研究的范围综述。","authors":"Alejandra Pulido-Saavedra, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Razi Kitaneh, Eric J Nunes, Colleen Fogg, Melissa C Funaro, Jeremy Weleff, Anahita Bassir Nia, Gustavo A Angarita","doi":"10.1007/s00018-024-05519-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current opioid crisis has had an unprecedented public health impact. Approved medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) exist, yet their limitations indicate a need for innovative treatments. Limited preliminary clinical studies suggest specific psychedelics might aid OUD treatment, though most clinical evidence remains observational, with few controlled trials. This review aims to bridge the gap between preclinical findings and potential clinical applications, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches included MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on preclinical in vivo studies involving opioids and psychedelics in animals, excluding pain studies and those lacking control groups. Forty studies met criteria, covering both classic and non-classic psychedelics. Most studies showed that 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), ibogaine, noribogaine, and ketamine could reduce opioid self-administration, alleviate withdrawal symptoms, and change conditioned place preference. However, seven studies (two on 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), three on ibogaine, one on 18-MC, and one on ketamine) showed no improvement over controls. A methodological quality assessment rated most of the studies as having unclear quality. Interestingly, most preclinical studies are limited to iboga derivatives, which were effective, but these agents may have higher cardiovascular risk than other psychedelics under-explored to date. This review strengthens support for translational studies testing psychedelics as potential innovative targets for OUD. It also suggests clinical studies need to include a broader range of agents beyond iboga derivatives but can also explore several ongoing questions in the field, such as the mechanism of action behind the potential therapeutic effect, safety profiles, doses, and frequency of administrations needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10007,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences","volume":"82 1","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of psychedelics on opioid use disorder: a scoping review of preclinical studies.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Pulido-Saavedra, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Razi Kitaneh, Eric J Nunes, Colleen Fogg, Melissa C Funaro, Jeremy Weleff, Anahita Bassir Nia, Gustavo A Angarita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00018-024-05519-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current opioid crisis has had an unprecedented public health impact. Approved medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) exist, yet their limitations indicate a need for innovative treatments. Limited preliminary clinical studies suggest specific psychedelics might aid OUD treatment, though most clinical evidence remains observational, with few controlled trials. This review aims to bridge the gap between preclinical findings and potential clinical applications, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches included MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on preclinical in vivo studies involving opioids and psychedelics in animals, excluding pain studies and those lacking control groups. Forty studies met criteria, covering both classic and non-classic psychedelics. Most studies showed that 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), ibogaine, noribogaine, and ketamine could reduce opioid self-administration, alleviate withdrawal symptoms, and change conditioned place preference. However, seven studies (two on 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), three on ibogaine, one on 18-MC, and one on ketamine) showed no improvement over controls. A methodological quality assessment rated most of the studies as having unclear quality. Interestingly, most preclinical studies are limited to iboga derivatives, which were effective, but these agents may have higher cardiovascular risk than other psychedelics under-explored to date. This review strengthens support for translational studies testing psychedelics as potential innovative targets for OUD. It also suggests clinical studies need to include a broader range of agents beyond iboga derivatives but can also explore several ongoing questions in the field, such as the mechanism of action behind the potential therapeutic effect, safety profiles, doses, and frequency of administrations needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05519-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05519-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的阿片类药物危机对公共卫生产生了前所未有的影响。阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的批准药物存在,但其局限性表明需要创新的治疗方法。有限的初步临床研究表明,特定的致幻剂可能有助于OUD的治疗,尽管大多数临床证据仍然是观察性的,很少有对照试验。本综述旨在根据PRISMA-ScR指南,弥合临床前发现和潜在临床应用之间的差距。检索包括MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus和Web of Science,重点是涉及阿片类药物和致幻剂的动物临床前体内研究,不包括疼痛研究和缺乏对照组的研究。40项研究符合标准,涵盖了经典和非经典迷幻药。大多数研究表明,18-甲氧基冠状苯胺(18-MC)、伊博格碱、去甲博格碱和氯胺酮可以减少阿片类药物的自我给药,减轻戒断症状,改变条件位置偏好。然而,7项研究(2项关于2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基安非他明(DOM)的研究,3项关于伊博卡因的研究,1项关于18-甲基安非他明的研究,1项关于氯胺酮的研究)显示,与对照组相比,没有任何改善。一项方法学质量评估将大多数研究评为质量不明确。有趣的是,大多数临床前研究仅限于有效的伊博加衍生物,但这些药物可能比迄今为止尚未开发的其他致幻剂具有更高的心血管风险。这篇综述加强了对将致幻剂作为OUD潜在创新靶点的转化研究的支持。它还建议临床研究需要包括更广泛的iboga衍生物以外的药物,但也可以探索该领域的几个正在进行的问题,例如潜在治疗效果背后的作用机制、安全性、剂量和所需的给药频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of psychedelics on opioid use disorder: a scoping review of preclinical studies.

The current opioid crisis has had an unprecedented public health impact. Approved medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) exist, yet their limitations indicate a need for innovative treatments. Limited preliminary clinical studies suggest specific psychedelics might aid OUD treatment, though most clinical evidence remains observational, with few controlled trials. This review aims to bridge the gap between preclinical findings and potential clinical applications, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches included MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on preclinical in vivo studies involving opioids and psychedelics in animals, excluding pain studies and those lacking control groups. Forty studies met criteria, covering both classic and non-classic psychedelics. Most studies showed that 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), ibogaine, noribogaine, and ketamine could reduce opioid self-administration, alleviate withdrawal symptoms, and change conditioned place preference. However, seven studies (two on 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), three on ibogaine, one on 18-MC, and one on ketamine) showed no improvement over controls. A methodological quality assessment rated most of the studies as having unclear quality. Interestingly, most preclinical studies are limited to iboga derivatives, which were effective, but these agents may have higher cardiovascular risk than other psychedelics under-explored to date. This review strengthens support for translational studies testing psychedelics as potential innovative targets for OUD. It also suggests clinical studies need to include a broader range of agents beyond iboga derivatives but can also explore several ongoing questions in the field, such as the mechanism of action behind the potential therapeutic effect, safety profiles, doses, and frequency of administrations needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
1.20%
发文量
546
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal Name: Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (CMLS) Location: Basel, Switzerland Focus: Multidisciplinary journal Publishes research articles, reviews, multi-author reviews, and visions & reflections articles Coverage: Latest aspects of biological and biomedical research Areas include: Biochemistry and molecular biology Cell biology Molecular and cellular aspects of biomedicine Neuroscience Pharmacology Immunology Additional Features: Welcomes comments on any article published in CMLS Accepts suggestions for topics to be covered
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信