在接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者中,酸抑制治疗的发展趋势:韩国2018年至2022年的一项全国性研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yu Jeong Lee, Nam Kyung Je
{"title":"在接受双重抗血小板治疗的患者中,酸抑制治疗的发展趋势:韩国2018年至2022年的一项全国性研究。","authors":"Yu Jeong Lee, Nam Kyung Je","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to examine the recent trends in the use of acid suppression therapies, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), in patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as aspirin-clopidogrel following coronary stent implantation in South Korea between 2018 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study analysed data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) on patients who underwent coronary stent implantation and received aspirin-clopidogrel DAPT. Patients who received acid suppression therapy for >60 days during DAPT were included in the analysis. Trends in the use of PPIs, H2RAs and P-CABs were assessed at 6-month intervals using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 128 121 patients studied who received DAPT, 61 731 (48.2%) were prescribed acid suppression therapy. The proportion of patients receiving concomitant acid suppressants with DAPT increased from 42.8% in 2018 to 53.8% in 2022. PPIs were the most commonly used therapies (78.9%), followed by H2RAs (14.6%) and P-CABs (6.5%). PPI use peaked in 2020 and declined thereafter, whereas P-CAB use steadily increased, surpassing that of H2RA by 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The landscape of acid suppression therapy for patients undergoing DAPT has evolved with a growing preference for P-CABs. This shift highlights the need for further research comparing the efficacy and safety of acid suppressants to guide clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving trends in acid suppression therapy among patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy: A Nationwide study in South Korea from 2018 to 2022.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Jeong Lee, Nam Kyung Je\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bcp.16398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to examine the recent trends in the use of acid suppression therapies, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), in patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as aspirin-clopidogrel following coronary stent implantation in South Korea between 2018 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study analysed data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) on patients who underwent coronary stent implantation and received aspirin-clopidogrel DAPT. Patients who received acid suppression therapy for >60 days during DAPT were included in the analysis. Trends in the use of PPIs, H2RAs and P-CABs were assessed at 6-month intervals using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 128 121 patients studied who received DAPT, 61 731 (48.2%) were prescribed acid suppression therapy. The proportion of patients receiving concomitant acid suppressants with DAPT increased from 42.8% in 2018 to 53.8% in 2022. PPIs were the most commonly used therapies (78.9%), followed by H2RAs (14.6%) and P-CABs (6.5%). PPI use peaked in 2020 and declined thereafter, whereas P-CAB use steadily increased, surpassing that of H2RA by 2021.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The landscape of acid suppression therapy for patients undergoing DAPT has evolved with a growing preference for P-CABs. This shift highlights the need for further research comparing the efficacy and safety of acid suppressants to guide clinical decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16398\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在研究2018年至2022年在韩国冠状动脉支架植入术后接受双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的患者中使用酸抑制疗法的最新趋势,包括质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)、组胺-2受体拮抗剂(H2RAs)和钾竞争酸阻滞剂(p - cab)。方法:本观察性研究分析了健康保险审查和评估服务(HIRA)对接受冠状动脉支架植入术并接受阿司匹林-氯吡格雷DAPT治疗的患者的数据。DAPT期间接受抑酸治疗60天的患者被纳入分析。使用Cochran-Armitage趋势检验每隔6个月评估ppi、H2RAs和p - cab的使用趋势。结果:128121例接受DAPT治疗的患者中,61731例(48.2%)接受抑酸治疗。DAPT同时使用抑酸药的患者比例从2018年的42.8%上升到2022年的53.8%。ppi是最常用的治疗方法(78.9%),其次是H2RAs(14.6%)和p - cab(6.5%)。PPI的使用在2020年达到峰值,此后下降,而P-CAB的使用稳步增长,到2021年超过H2RA。结论:DAPT患者的抑酸治疗前景随着对p - cab的日益偏好而发展。这一转变强调需要进一步研究比较酸抑制剂的有效性和安全性,以指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolving trends in acid suppression therapy among patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy: A Nationwide study in South Korea from 2018 to 2022.

Aims: We aimed to examine the recent trends in the use of acid suppression therapies, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), in patients undergoing dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) as aspirin-clopidogrel following coronary stent implantation in South Korea between 2018 and 2022.

Methods: This observational study analysed data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) on patients who underwent coronary stent implantation and received aspirin-clopidogrel DAPT. Patients who received acid suppression therapy for >60 days during DAPT were included in the analysis. Trends in the use of PPIs, H2RAs and P-CABs were assessed at 6-month intervals using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

Results: Of the 128 121 patients studied who received DAPT, 61 731 (48.2%) were prescribed acid suppression therapy. The proportion of patients receiving concomitant acid suppressants with DAPT increased from 42.8% in 2018 to 53.8% in 2022. PPIs were the most commonly used therapies (78.9%), followed by H2RAs (14.6%) and P-CABs (6.5%). PPI use peaked in 2020 and declined thereafter, whereas P-CAB use steadily increased, surpassing that of H2RA by 2021.

Conclusions: The landscape of acid suppression therapy for patients undergoing DAPT has evolved with a growing preference for P-CABs. This shift highlights the need for further research comparing the efficacy and safety of acid suppressants to guide clinical decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信