回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎:30年手术进展及患者预后分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-12-30 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae111
Gabriele Bislenghi, Antonio Luberto, Wout De Coster, Leen van Langenhoven, Albert Wolthuis, Marc Ferrante, Severine Vermeire, André D'Hoore
{"title":"回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎:30年手术进展及患者预后分析。","authors":"Gabriele Bislenghi, Antonio Luberto, Wout De Coster, Leen van Langenhoven, Albert Wolthuis, Marc Ferrante, Severine Vermeire, André D'Hoore","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis with medical refractory disease or dysplasia. The aim of this research was to describe the evolution of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery and surgical outcomes over a three-decade interval in a high-volume referral centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between 1990 and 2022 at the University Hospitals of Leuven were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three interval arms (interval A 1990-2000, interval B 2001-2010 and interval C 2011-2022). The primary outcomes of interest were anastomotic leakage at 30 days and pouch failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 492 patients were included. The use of preoperative advanced therapies increased over time (P < 0.001). An increase in laparoscopic procedures (23.2% in interval A, 66.4% in interval B, 86.0% in interval C; P < 0.001) and a shift towards delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (colectomy-first approach with delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction: 23.0% in interval A, 40.9% in interval B, 85.8% in interval C; P < 0.001) were observed. Anastomotic leakage rate decreased from 16.7% (interval A) to 8.4% (interval C) (P = 0.04). Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was the most relevant factor in limiting leakage (OR 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.87); P = 0.016). Median follow-up was 7.5 years (interquartile range 2.5-16). Cumulative pouch failure incidence was 8.2%, not significantly different between the three intervals (P = 0.580). Anastomotic leakage was the only significant risk factor for pouch failure (HR 2.82 (95% c.i. 1.29 to 6.20); P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant changes in the management of ulcerative colitis patients occurred. Despite the widespread use of advanced therapies and the expanded surgical indications, anastomotic leakage rate decreased over time. In the context of a delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, diverting ileostomy could be avoided in selected cases. Anastomotic leakage remains the most relevant risk factor for pouch failure. Pouch failure incidence remained stable over the years.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: 30-year analysis on surgical evolution and patient outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Bislenghi, Antonio Luberto, Wout De Coster, Leen van Langenhoven, Albert Wolthuis, Marc Ferrante, Severine Vermeire, André D'Hoore\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis with medical refractory disease or dysplasia. The aim of this research was to describe the evolution of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery and surgical outcomes over a three-decade interval in a high-volume referral centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between 1990 and 2022 at the University Hospitals of Leuven were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three interval arms (interval A 1990-2000, interval B 2001-2010 and interval C 2011-2022). The primary outcomes of interest were anastomotic leakage at 30 days and pouch failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 492 patients were included. The use of preoperative advanced therapies increased over time (P < 0.001). An increase in laparoscopic procedures (23.2% in interval A, 66.4% in interval B, 86.0% in interval C; P < 0.001) and a shift towards delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (colectomy-first approach with delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction: 23.0% in interval A, 40.9% in interval B, 85.8% in interval C; P < 0.001) were observed. Anastomotic leakage rate decreased from 16.7% (interval A) to 8.4% (interval C) (P = 0.04). Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was the most relevant factor in limiting leakage (OR 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.87); P = 0.016). Median follow-up was 7.5 years (interquartile range 2.5-16). Cumulative pouch failure incidence was 8.2%, not significantly different between the three intervals (P = 0.580). Anastomotic leakage was the only significant risk factor for pouch failure (HR 2.82 (95% c.i. 1.29 to 6.20); P = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant changes in the management of ulcerative colitis patients occurred. Despite the widespread use of advanced therapies and the expanded surgical indications, anastomotic leakage rate decreased over time. In the context of a delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, diverting ileostomy could be avoided in selected cases. Anastomotic leakage remains the most relevant risk factor for pouch failure. Pouch failure incidence remained stable over the years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:直结肠切除术联合回肠袋-肛门吻合术是治疗溃疡性结肠炎合并难治性疾病或发育不良患者的首选方法。本研究的目的是描述在一个大容量转诊中心的三十年间隔的回肠袋-肛门吻合术的发展和手术结果。方法:回顾性分析1990年至2022年在鲁汶大学医院接受回肠袋-肛门吻合术治疗溃疡性结肠炎的所有患者。患者被分为三个间隔组(A组1990-2000年,B组2001-2010年和C组2011-2022年)。主要观察结果为术后30天吻合口漏和眼袋破裂。结果:共纳入492例患者。术前高级治疗的使用随着时间的推移而增加(P < 0.001)。腹腔镜手术增加(A期23.2%,B期66.4%,C期86.0%;P < 0.001)和向延迟回肠袋-肛门吻合术的转变(结肠先入路与延迟回肠袋-肛门吻合术构建:23.0%在间隔a, 40.9%在间隔B, 85.8%在间隔C;P < 0.001)。吻合口漏率由16.7% (A段)降至8.4% (C段)(P = 0.04)。延迟回肠袋-肛门吻合术是限制漏的最相关因素(OR 0.49 (95% ci 0.27 ~ 0.87);P = 0.016)。中位随访时间为7.5年(四分位数间距2.5-16)。累积眼袋衰竭发生率为8.2%,三个间隔间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.580)。吻合口漏是眼袋失败的唯一显著危险因素(HR 2.82 (95% ci 1.29 ~ 6.20);P = 0.010)。结论:溃疡性结肠炎患者的治疗发生了显著变化。尽管广泛使用先进的治疗方法和扩大手术指征,吻合口漏率随着时间的推移而下降。在延迟回肠袋-肛门吻合术的情况下,在选定的病例中可以避免转移回肠造口。吻合口漏仍然是造成眼袋破裂最相关的危险因素。多年来,眼袋衰竭的发生率保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: 30-year analysis on surgical evolution and patient outcome.

Background: Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is the treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis with medical refractory disease or dysplasia. The aim of this research was to describe the evolution of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery and surgical outcomes over a three-decade interval in a high-volume referral centre.

Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between 1990 and 2022 at the University Hospitals of Leuven were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into three interval arms (interval A 1990-2000, interval B 2001-2010 and interval C 2011-2022). The primary outcomes of interest were anastomotic leakage at 30 days and pouch failure.

Results: Overall, 492 patients were included. The use of preoperative advanced therapies increased over time (P < 0.001). An increase in laparoscopic procedures (23.2% in interval A, 66.4% in interval B, 86.0% in interval C; P < 0.001) and a shift towards delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (colectomy-first approach with delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis construction: 23.0% in interval A, 40.9% in interval B, 85.8% in interval C; P < 0.001) were observed. Anastomotic leakage rate decreased from 16.7% (interval A) to 8.4% (interval C) (P = 0.04). Delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was the most relevant factor in limiting leakage (OR 0.49 (95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.87); P = 0.016). Median follow-up was 7.5 years (interquartile range 2.5-16). Cumulative pouch failure incidence was 8.2%, not significantly different between the three intervals (P = 0.580). Anastomotic leakage was the only significant risk factor for pouch failure (HR 2.82 (95% c.i. 1.29 to 6.20); P = 0.010).

Conclusion: Significant changes in the management of ulcerative colitis patients occurred. Despite the widespread use of advanced therapies and the expanded surgical indications, anastomotic leakage rate decreased over time. In the context of a delayed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, diverting ileostomy could be avoided in selected cases. Anastomotic leakage remains the most relevant risk factor for pouch failure. Pouch failure incidence remained stable over the years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信