父母和帮助者的供给率是否受到新个体模拟存在的影响?

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2
D'Amelio B Pietro, Carlson V Nora, Tognetti Arnaud, Sentís Marina, Silva R Liliana, Rybak Fanny, Covas Rita, Doutrelant Claire
{"title":"父母和帮助者的供给率是否受到新个体模拟存在的影响?","authors":"D'Amelio B Pietro, Carlson V Nora, Tognetti Arnaud, Sentís Marina, Silva R Liliana, Rybak Fanny, Covas Rita, Doutrelant Claire","doi":"10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cooperative behaviour is widespread in animals and is likely to be the result of multiple selective pressures. A contentious hypothesis is that helping enhances the probability of obtaining a sexual partner (i.e., confers direct benefits through sexual selection). Under this hypothesis, cooperative behaviours may have evolved into a signal. Consequently, we would expect individuals to enhance cooperation when a potential mate is present, to signal their status and quality. We evaluated this possibility in the cooperatively breeding sociable weaver (<i>Philetairus socius</i>). We simulated the presence of different types of individuals using a playback to test whether the simulated presence of an unknown individual, possibly a potential mate, increases provisioning rate in two classes of cooperating birds : breeders and helpers. If the signal is the provisioning rate in itself we expected increased feeding rates of male helpers during the simulated presence of an unknown female. Contrary to our predictions, the simulated presence in the audience of an unknown individual did not influence the nestling provisioning rate of birds of any sex and class. From these results, we conclude that in this species the variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be used as a signal in a sexual selection context. However, we also highlight the limitations of our methods and suggest improvements that future studies should incorporate when testing audience effects on cooperation.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>Animals may cooperate to gain direct benefits, like attracting mates. This happens for example in humans. In species where cooperation leads to direct sexual benefits, when the appropriate audience is present, (i.e., a potential mate), helpers should enhance their cooperation. To determine whether helping to raise others' young varies according to who is watching, we used playbacks to simulate the presence of unknown individuals of opposite sex (potential mates) while helpers were feeding young. Helping, quantified here as number of times food was brought to the chicks over an hour, was not affected by the simulated audience. We concluded that in sociable weavers variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be a signal to obtain direct sexual benefits.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":8881,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","volume":"79 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is provisioning rate of parents and helpers influenced by the simulated presence of novel individuals?\",\"authors\":\"D'Amelio B Pietro, Carlson V Nora, Tognetti Arnaud, Sentís Marina, Silva R Liliana, Rybak Fanny, Covas Rita, Doutrelant Claire\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Cooperative behaviour is widespread in animals and is likely to be the result of multiple selective pressures. A contentious hypothesis is that helping enhances the probability of obtaining a sexual partner (i.e., confers direct benefits through sexual selection). Under this hypothesis, cooperative behaviours may have evolved into a signal. Consequently, we would expect individuals to enhance cooperation when a potential mate is present, to signal their status and quality. We evaluated this possibility in the cooperatively breeding sociable weaver (<i>Philetairus socius</i>). We simulated the presence of different types of individuals using a playback to test whether the simulated presence of an unknown individual, possibly a potential mate, increases provisioning rate in two classes of cooperating birds : breeders and helpers. If the signal is the provisioning rate in itself we expected increased feeding rates of male helpers during the simulated presence of an unknown female. Contrary to our predictions, the simulated presence in the audience of an unknown individual did not influence the nestling provisioning rate of birds of any sex and class. From these results, we conclude that in this species the variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be used as a signal in a sexual selection context. However, we also highlight the limitations of our methods and suggest improvements that future studies should incorporate when testing audience effects on cooperation.</p><p><strong>Significance statement: </strong>Animals may cooperate to gain direct benefits, like attracting mates. This happens for example in humans. In species where cooperation leads to direct sexual benefits, when the appropriate audience is present, (i.e., a potential mate), helpers should enhance their cooperation. To determine whether helping to raise others' young varies according to who is watching, we used playbacks to simulate the presence of unknown individuals of opposite sex (potential mates) while helpers were feeding young. Helping, quantified here as number of times food was brought to the chicks over an hour, was not affected by the simulated audience. We concluded that in sociable weavers variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be a signal to obtain direct sexual benefits.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735550/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:合作行为在动物中广泛存在,可能是多重选择压力的结果。一个有争议的假设是,帮助提高了获得性伴侣的可能性(即,通过性选择给予直接利益)。在这种假设下,合作行为可能已经进化成一种信号。因此,当潜在伴侣出现时,我们会期望个体加强合作,以表明他们的地位和品质。我们在合作繁殖的群居织女(Philetairus socius)中评估了这种可能性。我们通过回放模拟不同类型个体的存在,来测试一个未知个体(可能是潜在的配偶)的模拟存在是否会增加两类合作鸟类(繁殖者和帮助者)的供给率。如果信号本身就是供给率,我们预计在模拟未知雌性存在时,雄性助手的供给率会增加。与我们的预测相反,在观众中模拟一个未知个体的存在并不影响任何性别和类别的鸟类的雏鸟供应率。从这些结果,我们得出结论,在这个物种中,供应率的变化不太可能被用作性选择背景下的信号。然而,我们也强调了我们方法的局限性,并提出了未来研究在测试观众对合作的影响时应该纳入的改进建议。意义说明:动物合作可能是为了获得直接利益,比如吸引配偶。这种情况在人类身上也会发生。在合作带来直接性利益的物种中,当合适的听众(即潜在的配偶)在场时,帮助者应该加强他们的合作。为了确定帮助抚养其他幼崽是否会因观看者的不同而有所不同,我们使用回放来模拟帮助者喂养幼崽时未知异性个体(潜在伴侣)的存在。帮助,在这里被量化为在一个小时内给小鸡们送食物的次数,没有受到模拟观众的影响。我们的结论是,在群居织工中,供给率的变化不太可能是获得直接性利益的信号。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is provisioning rate of parents and helpers influenced by the simulated presence of novel individuals?

Abstract: Cooperative behaviour is widespread in animals and is likely to be the result of multiple selective pressures. A contentious hypothesis is that helping enhances the probability of obtaining a sexual partner (i.e., confers direct benefits through sexual selection). Under this hypothesis, cooperative behaviours may have evolved into a signal. Consequently, we would expect individuals to enhance cooperation when a potential mate is present, to signal their status and quality. We evaluated this possibility in the cooperatively breeding sociable weaver (Philetairus socius). We simulated the presence of different types of individuals using a playback to test whether the simulated presence of an unknown individual, possibly a potential mate, increases provisioning rate in two classes of cooperating birds : breeders and helpers. If the signal is the provisioning rate in itself we expected increased feeding rates of male helpers during the simulated presence of an unknown female. Contrary to our predictions, the simulated presence in the audience of an unknown individual did not influence the nestling provisioning rate of birds of any sex and class. From these results, we conclude that in this species the variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be used as a signal in a sexual selection context. However, we also highlight the limitations of our methods and suggest improvements that future studies should incorporate when testing audience effects on cooperation.

Significance statement: Animals may cooperate to gain direct benefits, like attracting mates. This happens for example in humans. In species where cooperation leads to direct sexual benefits, when the appropriate audience is present, (i.e., a potential mate), helpers should enhance their cooperation. To determine whether helping to raise others' young varies according to who is watching, we used playbacks to simulate the presence of unknown individuals of opposite sex (potential mates) while helpers were feeding young. Helping, quantified here as number of times food was brought to the chicks over an hour, was not affected by the simulated audience. We concluded that in sociable weavers variation in provisioning rate is unlikely to be a signal to obtain direct sexual benefits.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00265-024-03548-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes reviews, original contributions and commentaries dealing with quantitative empirical and theoretical studies in the analysis of animal behavior at the level of the individual, group, population, community, and species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信