三维肿瘤-肝脏协同分析进一步提高了肝细胞癌的疗效预测:一项多中心研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yurong Jiang, Jiawei Zhang, Zhaochen Liu, Jinxiong Zhang, Xiangrong Yu, Danyan Lin, Dandan Dong, Mingyue Cai, Chongyang Duan, Shuyi Liu, Wenhui Wang, Yuan Chen, Qiyang Li, Weiguo Xu, Meiyan Huang, Sirui Fu
{"title":"三维肿瘤-肝脏协同分析进一步提高了肝细胞癌的疗效预测:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Yurong Jiang, Jiawei Zhang, Zhaochen Liu, Jinxiong Zhang, Xiangrong Yu, Danyan Lin, Dandan Dong, Mingyue Cai, Chongyang Duan, Shuyi Liu, Wenhui Wang, Yuan Chen, Qiyang Li, Weiguo Xu, Meiyan Huang, Sirui Fu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-13501-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Besides tumorous information, synergistic liver parenchyma assessments may provide additional insights into the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate whether 3D synergistic tumor-liver analysis could improve the prediction accuracy for HCC prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 422 HCC patients from six centers were included. Datasets were divided into training and external validation datasets. Besides tumor, we also performed automatic 3D assessment of liver parenchyma by extracting morphological and high-dimensional data, respectively. Subsequently, we constructed a tumor model, a tumor-liver model, a clinical model and an integrated model combining information from clinical factors, tumor and liver parenchyma. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to determine the optimal model. Subgroup analysis was conducted to test the robustness, and survival analysis was conducted to identify high- and low-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tumor-liver model was superior to the tumor model in terms of both discrimination (training dataset: 0.747 vs. 0.722; validation dataset: 0.719 vs. 0.683) and calibration. Moreover, the integrated model was superior to the clinical model and tumor-liver model, particularly in discrimination (training dataset: 0.765 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.747; validation dataset: 0.739 vs. 0.628 vs. 0.719). The AUC of the integrated model was not influenced by AFP level, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh grade, and treatment style in training (6 months p value: 0.245-0.452; 12 months p value: 0.357-0.845) and validation (6 months p value: 0.294-0.638; 12 months p value: 0.365-0.937) datasets. With a risk score of 1.06, high- and low-risk populations demonstrated significant difference for progression-free survival (p < 0.001 in both datasets).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined with clinical factors, 3D synergistic tumor-liver assessment improved the efficacy prediction of HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3D synergistic tumor-liver analysis further improves the efficacy prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Yurong Jiang, Jiawei Zhang, Zhaochen Liu, Jinxiong Zhang, Xiangrong Yu, Danyan Lin, Dandan Dong, Mingyue Cai, Chongyang Duan, Shuyi Liu, Wenhui Wang, Yuan Chen, Qiyang Li, Weiguo Xu, Meiyan Huang, Sirui Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12885-025-13501-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Besides tumorous information, synergistic liver parenchyma assessments may provide additional insights into the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate whether 3D synergistic tumor-liver analysis could improve the prediction accuracy for HCC prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 422 HCC patients from six centers were included. Datasets were divided into training and external validation datasets. Besides tumor, we also performed automatic 3D assessment of liver parenchyma by extracting morphological and high-dimensional data, respectively. Subsequently, we constructed a tumor model, a tumor-liver model, a clinical model and an integrated model combining information from clinical factors, tumor and liver parenchyma. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to determine the optimal model. Subgroup analysis was conducted to test the robustness, and survival analysis was conducted to identify high- and low-risk populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tumor-liver model was superior to the tumor model in terms of both discrimination (training dataset: 0.747 vs. 0.722; validation dataset: 0.719 vs. 0.683) and calibration. Moreover, the integrated model was superior to the clinical model and tumor-liver model, particularly in discrimination (training dataset: 0.765 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.747; validation dataset: 0.739 vs. 0.628 vs. 0.719). The AUC of the integrated model was not influenced by AFP level, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh grade, and treatment style in training (6 months p value: 0.245-0.452; 12 months p value: 0.357-0.845) and validation (6 months p value: 0.294-0.638; 12 months p value: 0.365-0.937) datasets. With a risk score of 1.06, high- and low-risk populations demonstrated significant difference for progression-free survival (p < 0.001 in both datasets).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined with clinical factors, 3D synergistic tumor-liver assessment improved the efficacy prediction of HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13501-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-13501-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:除了肿瘤信息外,协同肝实质评估可能为肝细胞癌(HCC)的预后提供额外的见解。本研究旨在探讨肿瘤-肝脏三维协同分析是否能提高肝癌预后预测的准确性。方法:共纳入来自6个中心的422例HCC患者。数据集分为训练数据集和外部验证数据集。除肿瘤外,我们还分别通过提取形态学和高维数据对肝实质进行了自动三维评估。随后,我们构建了肿瘤模型、肿瘤-肝脏模型、临床模型以及结合临床因素、肿瘤和肝脏实质信息的综合模型。比较了它们的判别和标定,确定了最优模型。采用亚组分析检验稳健性,采用生存分析确定高危人群和低危人群。结果:肿瘤-肝脏模型在两方面都优于肿瘤模型(训练数据集:0.747 vs. 0.722;验证数据集:0.719 vs. 0.683)和校准。此外,综合模型优于临床模型和肿瘤-肝脏模型,特别是在辨别方面(训练数据集:0.765 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.747;验证数据集:0.739对0.628对0.719)。综合模型的AUC不受AFP水平、BCLC分期、Child-Pugh分级、训练时治疗方式的影响(6个月p值:0.245 ~ 0.452;12个月p值:0.357-0.845)和验证(6个月p值:0.294-0.638;12个月p值:0.365-0.937)数据集。高危人群与低危人群无进展生存期的风险评分为1.06,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:结合临床因素,三维肿瘤-肝脏协同评估提高了HCC疗效预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3D synergistic tumor-liver analysis further improves the efficacy prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study.

Background: Besides tumorous information, synergistic liver parenchyma assessments may provide additional insights into the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate whether 3D synergistic tumor-liver analysis could improve the prediction accuracy for HCC prognosis.

Methods: A total of 422 HCC patients from six centers were included. Datasets were divided into training and external validation datasets. Besides tumor, we also performed automatic 3D assessment of liver parenchyma by extracting morphological and high-dimensional data, respectively. Subsequently, we constructed a tumor model, a tumor-liver model, a clinical model and an integrated model combining information from clinical factors, tumor and liver parenchyma. Their discrimination and calibration were compared to determine the optimal model. Subgroup analysis was conducted to test the robustness, and survival analysis was conducted to identify high- and low-risk populations.

Results: The tumor-liver model was superior to the tumor model in terms of both discrimination (training dataset: 0.747 vs. 0.722; validation dataset: 0.719 vs. 0.683) and calibration. Moreover, the integrated model was superior to the clinical model and tumor-liver model, particularly in discrimination (training dataset: 0.765 vs. 0.695 vs. 0.747; validation dataset: 0.739 vs. 0.628 vs. 0.719). The AUC of the integrated model was not influenced by AFP level, BCLC stage, Child-Pugh grade, and treatment style in training (6 months p value: 0.245-0.452; 12 months p value: 0.357-0.845) and validation (6 months p value: 0.294-0.638; 12 months p value: 0.365-0.937) datasets. With a risk score of 1.06, high- and low-risk populations demonstrated significant difference for progression-free survival (p < 0.001 in both datasets).

Conclusions: Combined with clinical factors, 3D synergistic tumor-liver assessment improved the efficacy prediction of HCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信