卫生专业人员和家长对口服皮质类固醇治疗学龄前喘息的共识结果:一项多国调查和名义小组技术研究。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Bohee Lee, Stephen W Turner, Jasmine Hine, Ann McMurray, Damian Roland, Meredith Louise Borland, Peter Csonka, Jonathan Grigg, Theresa W Guilbert, Tuomas Jartti, Abraham Oommen, Steff Lewis, Steve Cunningham
{"title":"卫生专业人员和家长对口服皮质类固醇治疗学龄前喘息的共识结果:一项多国调查和名义小组技术研究。","authors":"Bohee Lee, Stephen W Turner, Jasmine Hine, Ann McMurray, Damian Roland, Meredith Louise Borland, Peter Csonka, Jonathan Grigg, Theresa W Guilbert, Tuomas Jartti, Abraham Oommen, Steff Lewis, Steve Cunningham","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain priority consensus for outcome measures of oral corticosteroid treatment of preschool wheeze that represent stakeholder groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>(1) A systematic review to identify a set of outcome measures; (2) an international survey for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and a nominal group meeting with parents; (3) a final consensus nominal group meeting with key HCPs (trial investigators and paediatric emergency medicine clinicians) and the same parent group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Consensus priority of treatment outcome measures, outcome minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and level of concerns about adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through an iterative process engaging HCPs and parents, the final consensus on a primary outcome was Wheezing Severity Score (WSS). Secondary outcomes prioritised as a revisit to general practice/emergency department, rehospitalisation, length of hospital stay (LOS), time back to normal, doses of short-acting beta-agonists and additional steroid course. Compared with placebo, clinicians considered the median MCID change in WSS at 4 and 12 hours as 40% (IQR 29-51%) and 50% (37-63%) and 5 hours (4-6 hours) for LOS, and 2 days (2-3 days) for a time back to normal. Parents identified MCIDs which were frequently longer than physiologically observed impacts in trials. Concerns about multiple steroid doses were most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stakeholders prioritised change in WSS as the most favourable outcome measure. Our study demonstrated the potential of parent/patient engagement in co-creating patient research outcomes. Incorporating this result in the design of future clinical research will provide a more holistic assessment of the impact of treatment while ensuring relevant primary research outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus outcomes between health professionals and parents for oral corticosteroids in treating preschool wheeze: a multi-national survey and nominal group technique study.\",\"authors\":\"Bohee Lee, Stephen W Turner, Jasmine Hine, Ann McMurray, Damian Roland, Meredith Louise Borland, Peter Csonka, Jonathan Grigg, Theresa W Guilbert, Tuomas Jartti, Abraham Oommen, Steff Lewis, Steve Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To obtain priority consensus for outcome measures of oral corticosteroid treatment of preschool wheeze that represent stakeholder groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>(1) A systematic review to identify a set of outcome measures; (2) an international survey for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and a nominal group meeting with parents; (3) a final consensus nominal group meeting with key HCPs (trial investigators and paediatric emergency medicine clinicians) and the same parent group.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Consensus priority of treatment outcome measures, outcome minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and level of concerns about adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through an iterative process engaging HCPs and parents, the final consensus on a primary outcome was Wheezing Severity Score (WSS). Secondary outcomes prioritised as a revisit to general practice/emergency department, rehospitalisation, length of hospital stay (LOS), time back to normal, doses of short-acting beta-agonists and additional steroid course. Compared with placebo, clinicians considered the median MCID change in WSS at 4 and 12 hours as 40% (IQR 29-51%) and 50% (37-63%) and 5 hours (4-6 hours) for LOS, and 2 days (2-3 days) for a time back to normal. Parents identified MCIDs which were frequently longer than physiologically observed impacts in trials. Concerns about multiple steroid doses were most prevalent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Stakeholders prioritised change in WSS as the most favourable outcome measure. Our study demonstrated the potential of parent/patient engagement in co-creating patient research outcomes. Incorporating this result in the design of future clinical research will provide a more holistic assessment of the impact of treatment while ensuring relevant primary research outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:获得代表利益相关者群体的口服皮质类固醇治疗学龄前喘息的结局措施的优先共识。设计:(1)系统评价,以确定一套结果衡量标准;(2)对医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)进行国际调查,并与家长举行名义上的小组会议;(3)由主要HCPs(试验研究者和儿科急诊医学临床医生)和同一家长组组成的最终共识名义小组会议。主要结果测量:治疗结果测量的共识优先级,结果最小临床重要差异(MCIDs)和对不良反应的关注程度。结果:通过参与医护人员和家长的反复过程,对主要结果的最终共识是喘息严重程度评分(WSS)。次要结果优先考虑为全科/急诊科复诊、再住院、住院时间(LOS)、恢复正常时间、短效β受体激动剂的剂量和额外的类固醇疗程。与安慰剂相比,临床医生认为WSS在4和12小时的中位MCID变化为40% (IQR 29-51%)和50% (37-63%),LOS为5小时(4-6小时),2天(2-3天)恢复正常。在试验中,家长确定的MCIDs通常比生理观察到的影响要长。对多种类固醇剂量的担忧最为普遍。结论:利益相关者优先考虑WSS的变化作为最有利的结果测量。我们的研究证明了家长/患者参与共同创造患者研究成果的潜力。将这一结果纳入未来临床研究的设计将提供对治疗影响的更全面评估,同时确保相关的主要研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus outcomes between health professionals and parents for oral corticosteroids in treating preschool wheeze: a multi-national survey and nominal group technique study.

Objective: To obtain priority consensus for outcome measures of oral corticosteroid treatment of preschool wheeze that represent stakeholder groups.

Design: (1) A systematic review to identify a set of outcome measures; (2) an international survey for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and a nominal group meeting with parents; (3) a final consensus nominal group meeting with key HCPs (trial investigators and paediatric emergency medicine clinicians) and the same parent group.

Main outcome measures: Consensus priority of treatment outcome measures, outcome minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) and level of concerns about adverse effects.

Results: Through an iterative process engaging HCPs and parents, the final consensus on a primary outcome was Wheezing Severity Score (WSS). Secondary outcomes prioritised as a revisit to general practice/emergency department, rehospitalisation, length of hospital stay (LOS), time back to normal, doses of short-acting beta-agonists and additional steroid course. Compared with placebo, clinicians considered the median MCID change in WSS at 4 and 12 hours as 40% (IQR 29-51%) and 50% (37-63%) and 5 hours (4-6 hours) for LOS, and 2 days (2-3 days) for a time back to normal. Parents identified MCIDs which were frequently longer than physiologically observed impacts in trials. Concerns about multiple steroid doses were most prevalent.

Conclusions: Stakeholders prioritised change in WSS as the most favourable outcome measure. Our study demonstrated the potential of parent/patient engagement in co-creating patient research outcomes. Incorporating this result in the design of future clinical research will provide a more holistic assessment of the impact of treatment while ensuring relevant primary research outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
291
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信