关于缺乏心理动力学视角如何可能不利于性别关怀和决策的反思。

IF 1.2 4区医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY

Australasian Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1177/10398562241312979

Jillian Spencer, Roberto D'Angelo

{"title":"关于缺乏心理动力学视角如何可能不利于性别关怀和决策的反思。","authors":"Jillian Spencer, Roberto D'Angelo","doi":"10.1177/10398562241312979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo reflect on factors that may have led to the widespread implementation of gender affirming care (GAC) for minors by psychiatric clinical leaders despite the absence of a robust evidence base and the known risks of harm.ConclusionsThe progressive rejection of psychodynamic thinking by the profession of psychiatry may have contributed to psychiatrists failing to question key aspects of GAC for minors. Further, numerous unconscious factors potentially contribute to the foreclosure of thinking about the risks of gender medicine.","PeriodicalId":8630,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"278-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reflection on how the absence of a psychodynamic perspective may disadvantage gender care and decision-making.\",\"authors\":\"Jillian Spencer, Roberto D'Angelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10398562241312979\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveTo reflect on factors that may have led to the widespread implementation of gender affirming care (GAC) for minors by psychiatric clinical leaders despite the absence of a robust evidence base and the known risks of harm.ConclusionsThe progressive rejection of psychodynamic thinking by the profession of psychiatry may have contributed to psychiatrists failing to question key aspects of GAC for minors. Further, numerous unconscious factors potentially contribute to the foreclosure of thinking about the risks of gender medicine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"278-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241312979\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241312979","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：反思可能导致精神科临床领导在缺乏有力证据基础和已知危害风险的情况下，对未成年人广泛实施性别肯定护理（GAC）的因素。结论：精神病学专业对精神动力学思维的逐渐排斥可能导致精神科医生未能对未成年人GAC的关键方面提出质疑。此外，许多无意识的因素可能会导致对性别医学风险的思考丧失殆尽。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A reflection on how the absence of a psychodynamic perspective may disadvantage gender care and decision-making.

ObjectiveTo reflect on factors that may have led to the widespread implementation of gender affirming care (GAC) for minors by psychiatric clinical leaders despite the absence of a robust evidence base and the known risks of harm.ConclusionsThe progressive rejection of psychodynamic thinking by the profession of psychiatry may have contributed to psychiatrists failing to question key aspects of GAC for minors. Further, numerous unconscious factors potentially contribute to the foreclosure of thinking about the risks of gender medicine.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australasian Psychiatry 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

5.60%

发文量

159

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Australasian Psychiatry is the bi-monthly journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists (RANZCP) that aims to promote the art of psychiatry and its maintenance of excellence in practice. The journal is peer-reviewed and accepts submissions, presented as original research; reviews; descriptions of innovative services; comments on policy, history, politics, economics, training, ethics and the Arts as they relate to mental health and mental health services; statements of opinion and letters. Book reviews are commissioned by the editor. A section of the journal provides information on RANZCP business and related matters.