创伤护理与选择性开放式腹股沟疝修补的住院费用:近十年来全国趋势。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Anushka Paladugu, Megan Donnelly, Areg Grigorian, Lourdes Swentek, Catherine Kuza, Kurt Yamamoto, Jonathan Shipley, Ninh Nguyen, Jeffry Nahmias
{"title":"创伤护理与选择性开放式腹股沟疝修补的住院费用:近十年来全国趋势。","authors":"Anushka Paladugu, Megan Donnelly, Areg Grigorian, Lourdes Swentek, Catherine Kuza, Kurt Yamamoto, Jonathan Shipley, Ninh Nguyen, Jeffry Nahmias","doi":"10.1177/00031348251313995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. <b>Methods:</b> The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. <b>Results:</b> Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251313995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inpatient Cost of Trauma Care Versus Repair of Elective Open Inguinal Hernias: Nationwide Trends Over Nearly a Decade.\",\"authors\":\"Anushka Paladugu, Megan Donnelly, Areg Grigorian, Lourdes Swentek, Catherine Kuza, Kurt Yamamoto, Jonathan Shipley, Ninh Nguyen, Jeffry Nahmias\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00031348251313995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. <b>Methods:</b> The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. <b>Results:</b> Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion:</b> The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Surgeon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"31348251313995\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Surgeon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313995\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251313995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:人们担心创伤激活费用的增加会损害弱势患者的利益。相比之下,选择性开放式腹股沟疝修补术(E-OIHR)在技术方面仍然相对固定。本研究旨在检验E-OIHR和创伤患者的医疗保健成本,假设2010年至2018年创伤成本增加,而E-OIHR成本保持不变。方法:查询全国住院患者样本数据库(2010-2018),查询单侧E-OIHR或创伤相关住院的患者。每次入院的卫生保健费用、年度总费用以及E-OIHR和创伤入院的趋势也进行了检查。多元线性回归用于估计个人和医院水平变量与总成本的关联。结果:2018年单侧E-OIHR入院费用每例增加一倍以上。然而,每次入院的创伤费用也只增加了34%。所有E-OIHR入院的总费用增加了26%,而创伤住院费用增加了32%。创伤入院率和单侧E-OIHR入院率均下降;然而,E-OIHR入院率下降更多。多元线性回归显示,与E-OIHR费用相比,在调整了年份、年龄、严重程度、医院类型和住院时间后,创伤护理费用下降(P < 0.001)。结论:单侧E-OIHR住院费用的增长速度超过创伤。然而,创伤护理的总经济负担增加了数十亿美元,这是由于每次发病率的稳定增长和创伤入院率的轻微下降。似乎有必要加强对高价值护理的关注,以遏制电子《国际卫生条例》,特别是创伤方面日益增加的费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inpatient Cost of Trauma Care Versus Repair of Elective Open Inguinal Hernias: Nationwide Trends Over Nearly a Decade.

Purpose: Concerns exist regarding increased trauma activation fees at the expense of vulnerable patients. In contrast, elective open inguinal hernia repair (E-OIHR) has remained relatively fixed in terms of technique. This study aimed to examine health care costs for E-OIHR and trauma patients, hypothesizing trauma cost would increase from 2010 to 2018, while E-OIHR cost would remain unchanged. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2010-2018) for admitted patients undergoing unilateral E-OIHR or trauma-related admission. Health care costs per admission, total annual costs, and trends of E-OIHR and trauma admissions were also examined. Multiple linear regression was used to estimate the association of individual- and hospital-level variables with total costs. Results: Unilateral E-OIHR admission cost more than doubled per case in 2018. Trauma cost per admission also increased, however, only by 34%. Total costs for all E-OIHR admissions increased 26%, whereas trauma admission costs increased 32%. Both trauma admissions and unilateral E-OIHR admissions decreased; however, E-OIHR admissions decreased more. Multiple linear regression demonstrated compared to the cost of E-OIHR, trauma care decreased when adjusting for year, age, severity, hospital type, and length of stay (P < .001). Conclusion: The rate of increase in cost per unilateral E-OIHR admission exceeded that of trauma. However, the total economic burden for trauma care increased by billions of dollars due to a steady increase in per incidence cost and only slightly lower rates of trauma admissions. Increased focus on high-value care to curtail increasing costs of E-OIHR and especially trauma appears warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信