Danilea M Carmona Matos, Cheryl K Zogg, Mary A Siki, Hannah S Thomas, Jaina C Lane, Nensi M Ruzgar, Minerva A Romero Arenas
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行对申请外科住院医师的医学女性人数不足的影响。","authors":"Danilea M Carmona Matos, Cheryl K Zogg, Mary A Siki, Hannah S Thomas, Jaina C Lane, Nensi M Ruzgar, Minerva A Romero Arenas","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic brought additional challenges to the 2020-2021 application cycle. The objective of this study was to explore how such challenges altered the perceptions/motivations/concerns of applicants to surgical fields, particularly those self-identifying as women underrepresented-in-medicine (UiM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous mixed-methods survey was electronically distributed to all medical student members of the Association of Women Surgeons between 10/1/2020-12/31/2020. The survey was also shared via social-media posts from several other identity/affinity professional organizations. Quantitative responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were analyzed using a grounded-theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 women (n = 238) applicants completed the survey; 110 (45.8 %) identified as UiM. While each expressed concerns about COVID-19, UiM applicants reported significantly greater extents of concern about delayed USMLE/COMPLEX exams (44.0-vs-29.5 %, p = 0.042), missed mentorship opportunities (38.5%-vs-19.4 %, p = 0.001), and lack of access to research experiences (27.5-vs-14.0 %, p = 0.020). In the qualitative portion of the survey, UiM applicants highlighted the importance of ensuring a holistic application review, minimizing interview monopolization, recognizing the potential detrimental effects of parallel social and political unrest, and prioritizing DEI initiatives when choosing a residency program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women and gender non-conforming applicants faced important challenges in their application to surgical residency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical education governing bodies, program directors, and resident selection committees are encouraged to be vigilant about mitigating these challenges in the post-pandemic years.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experiences of underrepresented-in-medicine women applicants to surgical residency.\",\"authors\":\"Danilea M Carmona Matos, Cheryl K Zogg, Mary A Siki, Hannah S Thomas, Jaina C Lane, Nensi M Ruzgar, Minerva A Romero Arenas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic brought additional challenges to the 2020-2021 application cycle. The objective of this study was to explore how such challenges altered the perceptions/motivations/concerns of applicants to surgical fields, particularly those self-identifying as women underrepresented-in-medicine (UiM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous mixed-methods survey was electronically distributed to all medical student members of the Association of Women Surgeons between 10/1/2020-12/31/2020. The survey was also shared via social-media posts from several other identity/affinity professional organizations. Quantitative responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were analyzed using a grounded-theory approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 240 women (n = 238) applicants completed the survey; 110 (45.8 %) identified as UiM. While each expressed concerns about COVID-19, UiM applicants reported significantly greater extents of concern about delayed USMLE/COMPLEX exams (44.0-vs-29.5 %, p = 0.042), missed mentorship opportunities (38.5%-vs-19.4 %, p = 0.001), and lack of access to research experiences (27.5-vs-14.0 %, p = 0.020). In the qualitative portion of the survey, UiM applicants highlighted the importance of ensuring a holistic application review, minimizing interview monopolization, recognizing the potential detrimental effects of parallel social and political unrest, and prioritizing DEI initiatives when choosing a residency program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women and gender non-conforming applicants faced important challenges in their application to surgical residency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical education governing bodies, program directors, and resident selection committees are encouraged to be vigilant about mitigating these challenges in the post-pandemic years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116193\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the experiences of underrepresented-in-medicine women applicants to surgical residency.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic brought additional challenges to the 2020-2021 application cycle. The objective of this study was to explore how such challenges altered the perceptions/motivations/concerns of applicants to surgical fields, particularly those self-identifying as women underrepresented-in-medicine (UiM).
Methods: An anonymous mixed-methods survey was electronically distributed to all medical student members of the Association of Women Surgeons between 10/1/2020-12/31/2020. The survey was also shared via social-media posts from several other identity/affinity professional organizations. Quantitative responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were analyzed using a grounded-theory approach.
Results: A total of 240 women (n = 238) applicants completed the survey; 110 (45.8 %) identified as UiM. While each expressed concerns about COVID-19, UiM applicants reported significantly greater extents of concern about delayed USMLE/COMPLEX exams (44.0-vs-29.5 %, p = 0.042), missed mentorship opportunities (38.5%-vs-19.4 %, p = 0.001), and lack of access to research experiences (27.5-vs-14.0 %, p = 0.020). In the qualitative portion of the survey, UiM applicants highlighted the importance of ensuring a holistic application review, minimizing interview monopolization, recognizing the potential detrimental effects of parallel social and political unrest, and prioritizing DEI initiatives when choosing a residency program.
Conclusions: Women and gender non-conforming applicants faced important challenges in their application to surgical residency during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical education governing bodies, program directors, and resident selection committees are encouraged to be vigilant about mitigating these challenges in the post-pandemic years.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.