初级老年保健认知筛查项目的有效性和利用。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David P Salmon, Anna Malkina, Melanie L Johnson, Christina Gigliotti, Emily A Little, Douglas Galasko
{"title":"初级老年保健认知筛查项目的有效性和利用。","authors":"David P Salmon, Anna Malkina, Melanie L Johnson, Christina Gigliotti, Emily A Little, Douglas Galasko","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01637-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective detection of cognitive impairment in the primary care setting is limited by lack of time and specialized expertise to conduct detailed objective cognitive testing and few well-validated cognitive screening instruments that can be administered and evaluated quickly without expert supervision. We therefore developed a model cognitive screening program to provide relatively brief, objective assessment of a geriatric patient's memory and other cognitive abilities in cases where the primary care physician suspects but is unsure of the presence of a deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referred patients were tested during a 40-min session by a psychometrist or trained nurse in the clinic on a brief battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed multiple cognitive domains. Short questionnaires covering subjective cognitive complaints, symptoms of depression, and medical history were also administered. Results were conveyed to a dementia specialist who reviewed them and returned their judgement of the validity of the cognitive complaint to the primary care provider. Retrospective medical records review was carried out for a random (stratified) half of the sample to determine how screening results were utilized. Screening tests were repeated after two years in a subset of 69 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 638 patients screened (mean age = 75.9 years; mean education = 14.9 years; 58% women) were classified by screening as having normal cognition (n = 177), depression (with possible cognitive changes; n = 115), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 107), or dementia (n = 239). Classification accuracy was shown by high agreement with the eventual clinical diagnosis in the medical record (69%; Cohen's Kappa = .38; p < .001; 77% if MCI and dementia were collapsed; Cohen's Kappa = .58; p < .001) and longitudinal decline in cognitive test scores only in those initially classified as having MCI or dementia. Medical records documented discussion of screening results with the patient in 69% of cases (80% if MCI or dementia was detected) and often referral to a specialist (62%), new brain imaging (54%), or change in medication (58%) when screening indicated potential cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cognitive screening program was well accepted by primary care providers as an efficient and effective way to evaluate concerns about cognitive decline in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":"17 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and utilization of a cognitive screening program for primary geriatric care.\",\"authors\":\"David P Salmon, Anna Malkina, Melanie L Johnson, Christina Gigliotti, Emily A Little, Douglas Galasko\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-024-01637-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective detection of cognitive impairment in the primary care setting is limited by lack of time and specialized expertise to conduct detailed objective cognitive testing and few well-validated cognitive screening instruments that can be administered and evaluated quickly without expert supervision. We therefore developed a model cognitive screening program to provide relatively brief, objective assessment of a geriatric patient's memory and other cognitive abilities in cases where the primary care physician suspects but is unsure of the presence of a deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Referred patients were tested during a 40-min session by a psychometrist or trained nurse in the clinic on a brief battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed multiple cognitive domains. Short questionnaires covering subjective cognitive complaints, symptoms of depression, and medical history were also administered. Results were conveyed to a dementia specialist who reviewed them and returned their judgement of the validity of the cognitive complaint to the primary care provider. Retrospective medical records review was carried out for a random (stratified) half of the sample to determine how screening results were utilized. Screening tests were repeated after two years in a subset of 69 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 638 patients screened (mean age = 75.9 years; mean education = 14.9 years; 58% women) were classified by screening as having normal cognition (n = 177), depression (with possible cognitive changes; n = 115), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 107), or dementia (n = 239). Classification accuracy was shown by high agreement with the eventual clinical diagnosis in the medical record (69%; Cohen's Kappa = .38; p < .001; 77% if MCI and dementia were collapsed; Cohen's Kappa = .58; p < .001) and longitudinal decline in cognitive test scores only in those initially classified as having MCI or dementia. Medical records documented discussion of screening results with the patient in 69% of cases (80% if MCI or dementia was detected) and often referral to a specialist (62%), new brain imaging (54%), or change in medication (58%) when screening indicated potential cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cognitive screening program was well accepted by primary care providers as an efficient and effective way to evaluate concerns about cognitive decline in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740611/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01637-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01637-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于缺乏时间和专业知识来进行详细的客观认知测试,并且缺乏经过良好验证的认知筛查工具,可以在没有专家监督的情况下快速管理和评估,初级保健环境中有效检测认知障碍受到限制。因此,我们开发了一个模型认知筛查程序,在初级保健医生怀疑但不确定存在缺陷的情况下,为老年患者的记忆和其他认知能力提供相对简短、客观的评估。方法:转诊患者在40分钟的疗程中由心理测量学家或训练有素的护士在诊所进行简短的神经心理测试,评估多个认知领域。简短的问卷调查包括主观认知问题、抑郁症状和病史。结果被传达给一位痴呆症专家,他对结果进行了审查,并将他们对认知抱怨有效性的判断反馈给初级保健提供者。对随机(分层)一半的样本进行回顾性医疗记录审查,以确定如何利用筛查结果。两年后,在69名患者中重复筛查测试。结果:638例筛查患者(平均年龄75.9岁;平均受教育年限为14.9年;58%的女性)通过筛查分为认知正常(n = 177),抑郁(可能有认知改变;n = 115),轻度认知障碍(MCI;N = 107)或痴呆症(N = 239)。分类准确性与最终临床诊断在医疗记录中的高度一致(69%;Cohen’s Kappa = 0.38;结论:认知筛查项目作为一种评估老年人认知能力下降的有效方法,被初级保健提供者广泛接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness and utilization of a cognitive screening program for primary geriatric care.

Background: Effective detection of cognitive impairment in the primary care setting is limited by lack of time and specialized expertise to conduct detailed objective cognitive testing and few well-validated cognitive screening instruments that can be administered and evaluated quickly without expert supervision. We therefore developed a model cognitive screening program to provide relatively brief, objective assessment of a geriatric patient's memory and other cognitive abilities in cases where the primary care physician suspects but is unsure of the presence of a deficit.

Methods: Referred patients were tested during a 40-min session by a psychometrist or trained nurse in the clinic on a brief battery of neuropsychological tests that assessed multiple cognitive domains. Short questionnaires covering subjective cognitive complaints, symptoms of depression, and medical history were also administered. Results were conveyed to a dementia specialist who reviewed them and returned their judgement of the validity of the cognitive complaint to the primary care provider. Retrospective medical records review was carried out for a random (stratified) half of the sample to determine how screening results were utilized. Screening tests were repeated after two years in a subset of 69 patients.

Results: The 638 patients screened (mean age = 75.9 years; mean education = 14.9 years; 58% women) were classified by screening as having normal cognition (n = 177), depression (with possible cognitive changes; n = 115), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n = 107), or dementia (n = 239). Classification accuracy was shown by high agreement with the eventual clinical diagnosis in the medical record (69%; Cohen's Kappa = .38; p < .001; 77% if MCI and dementia were collapsed; Cohen's Kappa = .58; p < .001) and longitudinal decline in cognitive test scores only in those initially classified as having MCI or dementia. Medical records documented discussion of screening results with the patient in 69% of cases (80% if MCI or dementia was detected) and often referral to a specialist (62%), new brain imaging (54%), or change in medication (58%) when screening indicated potential cognitive impairment.

Conclusion: The cognitive screening program was well accepted by primary care providers as an efficient and effective way to evaluate concerns about cognitive decline in older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信