{"title":"结合Landsat 5 TM和无人机图像,在有限的地面流速和水位观测下估算河流流量","authors":"Maomao Li, Changsen Zhao, Qi Huang, Tianli Pan, Hervé Yesou, Françoise Nerry, Zhao-Liang Li","doi":"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"River discharge plays an indispensable role in maintaining the stability of the hydrosphere system and eco-environment. Previous methods that utilize satellite imagery to estimate discharge over poorly gauged basins are generally tailored for large rivers and heavily reliant on ground-based measurements. Consequently, uncertainties often escalate when these methods are applied to medium-sized rivers. Based on Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images, this study proposed a framework for estimating the discharge of large and medium rivers with limited ground observations. It comprises (1) a modified C/M method, which considers the spatial heterogeneity of rivers using single-site observation data, and (2) a newly developed method for estimating river bathymetry with zero discharge measurements (RIBA-zero). Results show that, utilizing the modified <em>C</em>/<em>M</em> method, rivers wider than three times the satellite resolution (i.e., 90 m) exhibit a relative root mean square error (rRMSE) of 0.23 in the velocity estimation. Narrower rivers display a slight increase in the rRMSE (0.41), which is still within an encouraging range. For both types of river widths, the accuracy of flow velocity estimation is higher during high-flow periods compared with the low-flow counterparts. In terms of the flow area estimation, the RIBA-zero method is much more suited for parabola-shaped cross-sections (rRMSE = 0.22) and flood seasons (rRMSE = 0.35). Additionally, when replacing 30-m Landsat 5 TM with 10 m-resolution Sentinel-2 imageries, the approaches make a significant improvement in velocity estimation for rivers narrower than 90 m across all periods, exhibiting great potential to estimate discharge in medium rivers with finer resolution satellite imageries. The framework requires a few ground observations for discharge estimates with the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) reaching ∼0.9, thereby greatly facilitating hydrology-related studies with profound implications for sustainable water resources management worldwide.","PeriodicalId":417,"journal":{"name":"Remote Sensing of Environment","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining Landsat 5 TM and UAV images to estimate river discharge with limited ground-based flow velocity and water level observations\",\"authors\":\"Maomao Li, Changsen Zhao, Qi Huang, Tianli Pan, Hervé Yesou, Françoise Nerry, Zhao-Liang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rse.2025.114610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"River discharge plays an indispensable role in maintaining the stability of the hydrosphere system and eco-environment. Previous methods that utilize satellite imagery to estimate discharge over poorly gauged basins are generally tailored for large rivers and heavily reliant on ground-based measurements. Consequently, uncertainties often escalate when these methods are applied to medium-sized rivers. Based on Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images, this study proposed a framework for estimating the discharge of large and medium rivers with limited ground observations. It comprises (1) a modified C/M method, which considers the spatial heterogeneity of rivers using single-site observation data, and (2) a newly developed method for estimating river bathymetry with zero discharge measurements (RIBA-zero). Results show that, utilizing the modified <em>C</em>/<em>M</em> method, rivers wider than three times the satellite resolution (i.e., 90 m) exhibit a relative root mean square error (rRMSE) of 0.23 in the velocity estimation. Narrower rivers display a slight increase in the rRMSE (0.41), which is still within an encouraging range. For both types of river widths, the accuracy of flow velocity estimation is higher during high-flow periods compared with the low-flow counterparts. In terms of the flow area estimation, the RIBA-zero method is much more suited for parabola-shaped cross-sections (rRMSE = 0.22) and flood seasons (rRMSE = 0.35). Additionally, when replacing 30-m Landsat 5 TM with 10 m-resolution Sentinel-2 imageries, the approaches make a significant improvement in velocity estimation for rivers narrower than 90 m across all periods, exhibiting great potential to estimate discharge in medium rivers with finer resolution satellite imageries. The framework requires a few ground observations for discharge estimates with the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) reaching ∼0.9, thereby greatly facilitating hydrology-related studies with profound implications for sustainable water resources management worldwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Remote Sensing of Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114610\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Remote Sensing of Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114610","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combining Landsat 5 TM and UAV images to estimate river discharge with limited ground-based flow velocity and water level observations
River discharge plays an indispensable role in maintaining the stability of the hydrosphere system and eco-environment. Previous methods that utilize satellite imagery to estimate discharge over poorly gauged basins are generally tailored for large rivers and heavily reliant on ground-based measurements. Consequently, uncertainties often escalate when these methods are applied to medium-sized rivers. Based on Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images, this study proposed a framework for estimating the discharge of large and medium rivers with limited ground observations. It comprises (1) a modified C/M method, which considers the spatial heterogeneity of rivers using single-site observation data, and (2) a newly developed method for estimating river bathymetry with zero discharge measurements (RIBA-zero). Results show that, utilizing the modified C/M method, rivers wider than three times the satellite resolution (i.e., 90 m) exhibit a relative root mean square error (rRMSE) of 0.23 in the velocity estimation. Narrower rivers display a slight increase in the rRMSE (0.41), which is still within an encouraging range. For both types of river widths, the accuracy of flow velocity estimation is higher during high-flow periods compared with the low-flow counterparts. In terms of the flow area estimation, the RIBA-zero method is much more suited for parabola-shaped cross-sections (rRMSE = 0.22) and flood seasons (rRMSE = 0.35). Additionally, when replacing 30-m Landsat 5 TM with 10 m-resolution Sentinel-2 imageries, the approaches make a significant improvement in velocity estimation for rivers narrower than 90 m across all periods, exhibiting great potential to estimate discharge in medium rivers with finer resolution satellite imageries. The framework requires a few ground observations for discharge estimates with the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) reaching ∼0.9, thereby greatly facilitating hydrology-related studies with profound implications for sustainable water resources management worldwide.
期刊介绍:
Remote Sensing of Environment (RSE) serves the Earth observation community by disseminating results on the theory, science, applications, and technology that contribute to advancing the field of remote sensing. With a thoroughly interdisciplinary approach, RSE encompasses terrestrial, oceanic, and atmospheric sensing.
The journal emphasizes biophysical and quantitative approaches to remote sensing at local to global scales, covering a diverse range of applications and techniques.
RSE serves as a vital platform for the exchange of knowledge and advancements in the dynamic field of remote sensing.