基于混合可信度学习的数据驱动电力系统动态安全评估可信度研究

IF 7.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Qiaoqiao Li;Yan Xu;Chao Ren;Rui Zhang
{"title":"基于混合可信度学习的数据驱动电力系统动态安全评估可信度研究","authors":"Qiaoqiao Li;Yan Xu;Chao Ren;Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TPWRS.2025.3532124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter proposed a hybrid credibility learning method for data-driven Dynamic Security Assessment (DSA), aiming to enhance the trustworthiness of DSA results under out-of-distribution changing system conditions. The proposed method integrates multiple credibility criteria as learning inputs, combining model consistency—reflected through the output distribution of ensemble learners—with novel indicators of data disparities, namely the Degree of Outlier (DOO) and One-sample Maximum Mean Discrepancy (O-MMD). Moreover, the credibility model benefits from training on a specifically designed out-of-distribution dataset which is further reinforced through misclassified DSA instances. This letter also provides a comprehensive comparison of existing credible DSA methods via the proposed trustworthiness evaluation index. Simulation results on the benchmark testing system show that the proposed method can achieve the best trade-off between DSA accuracy and credibility under various extreme system conditions.","PeriodicalId":13373,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","volume":"40 3","pages":"2791-2794"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Trustworthiness of Data-Driven Power System Dynamic Security Assessment via Hybrid Credibility Learning\",\"authors\":\"Qiaoqiao Li;Yan Xu;Chao Ren;Rui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPWRS.2025.3532124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This letter proposed a hybrid credibility learning method for data-driven Dynamic Security Assessment (DSA), aiming to enhance the trustworthiness of DSA results under out-of-distribution changing system conditions. The proposed method integrates multiple credibility criteria as learning inputs, combining model consistency—reflected through the output distribution of ensemble learners—with novel indicators of data disparities, namely the Degree of Outlier (DOO) and One-sample Maximum Mean Discrepancy (O-MMD). Moreover, the credibility model benefits from training on a specifically designed out-of-distribution dataset which is further reinforced through misclassified DSA instances. This letter also provides a comprehensive comparison of existing credible DSA methods via the proposed trustworthiness evaluation index. Simulation results on the benchmark testing system show that the proposed method can achieve the best trade-off between DSA accuracy and credibility under various extreme system conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"2791-2794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10848137/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10848137/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种数据驱动动态安全评估(DSA)的混合可信度学习方法,旨在提高DSA结果在分布外变化系统条件下的可信度。该方法将多个可信度标准作为学习输入,将模型一致性(通过集成学习器的输出分布反映)与新颖的数据差异指标(即离群度(DOO)和单样本最大平均差异(O-MMD))相结合。此外,可信度模型受益于在特定设计的分布外数据集上的训练,该数据集通过错误分类的DSA实例进一步增强。这封信还提供了一个全面的比较现有可信的DSA方法通过提出的可信度评估指数。在基准测试系统上的仿真结果表明,该方法可以在各种极端系统条件下实现DSA精度和可信度的最佳权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Trustworthiness of Data-Driven Power System Dynamic Security Assessment via Hybrid Credibility Learning
This letter proposed a hybrid credibility learning method for data-driven Dynamic Security Assessment (DSA), aiming to enhance the trustworthiness of DSA results under out-of-distribution changing system conditions. The proposed method integrates multiple credibility criteria as learning inputs, combining model consistency—reflected through the output distribution of ensemble learners—with novel indicators of data disparities, namely the Degree of Outlier (DOO) and One-sample Maximum Mean Discrepancy (O-MMD). Moreover, the credibility model benefits from training on a specifically designed out-of-distribution dataset which is further reinforced through misclassified DSA instances. This letter also provides a comprehensive comparison of existing credible DSA methods via the proposed trustworthiness evaluation index. Simulation results on the benchmark testing system show that the proposed method can achieve the best trade-off between DSA accuracy and credibility under various extreme system conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
7.60%
发文量
696
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The scope of IEEE Transactions on Power Systems covers the education, analysis, operation, planning, and economics of electric generation, transmission, and distribution systems for general industrial, commercial, public, and domestic consumption, including the interaction with multi-energy carriers. The focus of this transactions is the power system from a systems viewpoint instead of components of the system. It has five (5) key areas within its scope with several technical topics within each area. These areas are: (1) Power Engineering Education, (2) Power System Analysis, Computing, and Economics, (3) Power System Dynamic Performance, (4) Power System Operations, and (5) Power System Planning and Implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信