Saba S. Paracha, Shani A. Williams, Alizeh Shamshad, Elijah M. Persad-Paisley, Michael E. Migliori
{"title":"代表性商数以检验眼科住院医师申请人和毕业生的多样性","authors":"Saba S. Paracha, Shani A. Williams, Alizeh Shamshad, Elijah M. Persad-Paisley, Michael E. Migliori","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceA diverse ophthalmic workforce is key to equitable care, and identifying areas of underrepresentation is important in tackling vision care disparities.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diversity of applicants and matriculants in ophthalmology residency programs relative to medical school graduates and analyze the intersection of race and gender within this pathway.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from 2022 to 2024 used representation quotients (RQs) using reports from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology and San Francisco Match, along with demographic data from the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2008 to 2021. RQs measure equity by dividing a racial, ethnic, or gender group’s proportion in a specific population by its proportion in a larger reference population. Individuals who graduated from US medical schools from 2008 to 2021 or who applied to or matriculated into US ophthalmology residency programs from 2015 to 2021 and from 2008 to 2021, respectively, were eligible for inclusion.ExposureApplying to or matriculating into ophthalmology residency.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was median RQs and trends among racial, ethnic, and gender groups for ophthalmology applicants (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>) and matriculants (RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>), with RQ differences evaluated using Mann-Whitney <jats:italic>U</jats:italic> tests.ResultsAmong total applicants (n = 5304) and matriculants (n = 6139), 36% and 42% of applicants and matriculants, respectively, were female (applicants: 28% Asian, 4% Black, 7% Hispanic, and 47% White; matriculants: 31% Asian, 3% Black, 5% Hispanic, and 57% White). Self-identified Black individuals had the lowest median (IQR) RQs (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 0.604 [0.437-0.771]; RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 0.469 [0.341-0.597]). Regression analysis revealed increased representation for male applicants (slope, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.015-0.057; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .007) and matriculants (slope, 0.009; 95% CI, 0.002-0.016; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02), but decreased representation for female applicants (slope, –0.031; 95% CI, –0.010 to –0.102; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01) and matriculants (slope, –0.009; 95% CI, –0.016 to –0.002; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02). Black (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 0.604 vs RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 0.469; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .047) and Hispanic (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 1.46 vs RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 1.04; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .03) groups experienced a decrease between applicant and matriculants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional retrospective study found persistent underrepresentation of Black and female individuals in ophthalmology residency programs, with increases in Black and Hispanic applicants failing to translate into higher matriculation rates. Barriers that female or Black medical students face when applying or matriculating into ophthalmology residency may contribute to their underrepresentation in the field.","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation Quotients to Examine Diversity in Ophthalmology Residency Applicants and Matriculants\",\"authors\":\"Saba S. Paracha, Shani A. Williams, Alizeh Shamshad, Elijah M. Persad-Paisley, Michael E. Migliori\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ImportanceA diverse ophthalmic workforce is key to equitable care, and identifying areas of underrepresentation is important in tackling vision care disparities.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diversity of applicants and matriculants in ophthalmology residency programs relative to medical school graduates and analyze the intersection of race and gender within this pathway.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from 2022 to 2024 used representation quotients (RQs) using reports from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology and San Francisco Match, along with demographic data from the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2008 to 2021. RQs measure equity by dividing a racial, ethnic, or gender group’s proportion in a specific population by its proportion in a larger reference population. Individuals who graduated from US medical schools from 2008 to 2021 or who applied to or matriculated into US ophthalmology residency programs from 2015 to 2021 and from 2008 to 2021, respectively, were eligible for inclusion.ExposureApplying to or matriculating into ophthalmology residency.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was median RQs and trends among racial, ethnic, and gender groups for ophthalmology applicants (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>) and matriculants (RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>), with RQ differences evaluated using Mann-Whitney <jats:italic>U</jats:italic> tests.ResultsAmong total applicants (n = 5304) and matriculants (n = 6139), 36% and 42% of applicants and matriculants, respectively, were female (applicants: 28% Asian, 4% Black, 7% Hispanic, and 47% White; matriculants: 31% Asian, 3% Black, 5% Hispanic, and 57% White). Self-identified Black individuals had the lowest median (IQR) RQs (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 0.604 [0.437-0.771]; RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 0.469 [0.341-0.597]). Regression analysis revealed increased representation for male applicants (slope, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.015-0.057; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .007) and matriculants (slope, 0.009; 95% CI, 0.002-0.016; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02), but decreased representation for female applicants (slope, –0.031; 95% CI, –0.010 to –0.102; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .01) and matriculants (slope, –0.009; 95% CI, –0.016 to –0.002; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .02). Black (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 0.604 vs RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 0.469; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .047) and Hispanic (RQ<jats:sub>app</jats:sub>, 1.46 vs RQ<jats:sub>mat</jats:sub>, 1.04; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = .03) groups experienced a decrease between applicant and matriculants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional retrospective study found persistent underrepresentation of Black and female individuals in ophthalmology residency programs, with increases in Black and Hispanic applicants failing to translate into higher matriculation rates. Barriers that female or Black medical students face when applying or matriculating into ophthalmology residency may contribute to their underrepresentation in the field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5863\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.5863","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
重要性多元化的眼科人才队伍是实现公平医疗的关键,而确定代表性不足的领域对于解决视力保健差异问题非常重要。目的评估眼科住院医师培训项目的申请人和预科生相对于医学院毕业生的多样性,并分析这一途径中种族和性别的交叉情况。设计、设置和参与者这项回顾性横断面研究于 2022 年至 2024 年进行,使用了大学眼科教授协会(Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology)和旧金山匹配协会(San Francisco Match)的报告,以及美国医学院协会(Association of American Medical Colleges)2008 年至 2021 年的人口统计数据。RQs 通过将种族、民族或性别群体在特定人群中的比例除以其在更大参考人群中的比例来衡量公平性。2008年至2021年期间毕业于美国医学院的学生,或2015年至2021年期间和2008年至2021年期间分别申请或进入美国眼科住院医师培训项目的学生均符合纳入条件。主要结果和衡量标准主要结果是眼科申请者(RQapp)和预科生(RQmat)的RQ中位数以及种族、民族和性别群体之间的趋势,RQ差异采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行评估。结果在所有申请者(n = 5304)和预科生(n = 6139)中,分别有 36% 和 42% 的申请者和预科生为女性(申请者:28% 亚洲人、4% 黑人、7% 西班牙人和 47% 白人;预科生:31% 亚洲人、3% 黑人、7% 西班牙人和 47% 白人):亚裔占 31%,黑人占 3%,西班牙裔占 5%,白人占 57%)。自我认同的黑人的 RQ 中位数(IQR)最低(RQapp,0.604 [0.437-0.771];RQmat,0.469 [0.341-0.597])。回归分析表明,男性申请者(斜率为 0.036;95% CI 为 0.015-0.057;P = .007)和预科生(斜率为 0.009;95% CI 为 0.002-0.016;P = .02)的代表性有所增加,但女性申请者(斜率为-0.031;95% CI 为-0.010--0.102;P = .01)和预科生(斜率为-0.009;95% CI 为-0.016--0.002;P = .02)的代表性有所下降。黑人(RQapp, 0.604 vs RQmat, 0.469; P = .047)和西班牙裔(RQapp, 1.46 vs RQmat, 1.04; P = .03)群体在申请者和注册者之间的比率有所下降。女性或黑人医学生在申请或进入眼科住院医师培训项目时所面临的障碍可能会导致她们在该领域的代表性不足。
Representation Quotients to Examine Diversity in Ophthalmology Residency Applicants and Matriculants
ImportanceA diverse ophthalmic workforce is key to equitable care, and identifying areas of underrepresentation is important in tackling vision care disparities.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diversity of applicants and matriculants in ophthalmology residency programs relative to medical school graduates and analyze the intersection of race and gender within this pathway.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cross-sectional study conducted from 2022 to 2024 used representation quotients (RQs) using reports from the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology and San Francisco Match, along with demographic data from the Association of American Medical Colleges from 2008 to 2021. RQs measure equity by dividing a racial, ethnic, or gender group’s proportion in a specific population by its proportion in a larger reference population. Individuals who graduated from US medical schools from 2008 to 2021 or who applied to or matriculated into US ophthalmology residency programs from 2015 to 2021 and from 2008 to 2021, respectively, were eligible for inclusion.ExposureApplying to or matriculating into ophthalmology residency.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was median RQs and trends among racial, ethnic, and gender groups for ophthalmology applicants (RQapp) and matriculants (RQmat), with RQ differences evaluated using Mann-Whitney U tests.ResultsAmong total applicants (n = 5304) and matriculants (n = 6139), 36% and 42% of applicants and matriculants, respectively, were female (applicants: 28% Asian, 4% Black, 7% Hispanic, and 47% White; matriculants: 31% Asian, 3% Black, 5% Hispanic, and 57% White). Self-identified Black individuals had the lowest median (IQR) RQs (RQapp, 0.604 [0.437-0.771]; RQmat, 0.469 [0.341-0.597]). Regression analysis revealed increased representation for male applicants (slope, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.015-0.057; P = .007) and matriculants (slope, 0.009; 95% CI, 0.002-0.016; P = .02), but decreased representation for female applicants (slope, –0.031; 95% CI, –0.010 to –0.102; P = .01) and matriculants (slope, –0.009; 95% CI, –0.016 to –0.002; P = .02). Black (RQapp, 0.604 vs RQmat, 0.469; P = .047) and Hispanic (RQapp, 1.46 vs RQmat, 1.04; P = .03) groups experienced a decrease between applicant and matriculants.Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional retrospective study found persistent underrepresentation of Black and female individuals in ophthalmology residency programs, with increases in Black and Hispanic applicants failing to translate into higher matriculation rates. Barriers that female or Black medical students face when applying or matriculating into ophthalmology residency may contribute to their underrepresentation in the field.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.