基于开发的基于阻尼弹簧的活板门模型的桩基沉降路堤土拱行为数值研究

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jie Zhou, Ling Zhang, Wenzhe Peng, Zeyu Xu, Shuai Zhou, Gaoqiao Wu
{"title":"基于开发的基于阻尼弹簧的活板门模型的桩基沉降路堤土拱行为数值研究","authors":"Jie Zhou, Ling Zhang, Wenzhe Peng, Zeyu Xu, Shuai Zhou, Gaoqiao Wu","doi":"10.1002/nag.3940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil arching is one of the main mechanisms for load transfer in pile‐supported embankments, and the soil arching evolution patterns varied significantly depending on fill heights, pile spacings, pile stiffness, and soil stiffness. However, research on the effect of pile settlement on soil arching is relatively scarce, and most studies still use the traditional trapdoor test with a fixed arch foot to examine the soil arching. Therefore, this study establishes numerical models of a damping spring‐based trapdoor that considers pile settlement, and through 52 sets of spring‐based trapdoor tests and 1 set of reference tests, it systematically investigates the effects of various factors such as pile–soil stiffness ratio, fill height, and pile spacing on the soil arching under pile settlement conditions. The research results show that reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will reduce differential settlement between piles and soil, but it will exacerbate overall settlement. The stiffness ratio has a significant impact on soil arching: appropriately reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will help to recover fill deformation and suppress the formation of passive soil arch; increasing the stiffness ratio will enhance the stability of the soil arching. In addition, when the soft soil stiffness <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>s</jats:sub> is low, pile settlement helps to enhance the soil arching, and the enhancement effect becomes more significant with an increase in fill height <jats:italic>H</jats:italic> and pile spacing <jats:italic>S</jats:italic>/<jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. When <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>s</jats:sub> is high, pile settlement weakens the soil arching, which intensifies with an increase in fill height but weakens with an increase in <jats:italic>S</jats:italic>/<jats:italic>a</jats:italic>.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Study on Soil‐Arching Behavior in Pile‐Supported Embankments With Pile Settlement by Developed Damping Spring‐Based Trapdoor Model\",\"authors\":\"Jie Zhou, Ling Zhang, Wenzhe Peng, Zeyu Xu, Shuai Zhou, Gaoqiao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nag.3940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil arching is one of the main mechanisms for load transfer in pile‐supported embankments, and the soil arching evolution patterns varied significantly depending on fill heights, pile spacings, pile stiffness, and soil stiffness. However, research on the effect of pile settlement on soil arching is relatively scarce, and most studies still use the traditional trapdoor test with a fixed arch foot to examine the soil arching. Therefore, this study establishes numerical models of a damping spring‐based trapdoor that considers pile settlement, and through 52 sets of spring‐based trapdoor tests and 1 set of reference tests, it systematically investigates the effects of various factors such as pile–soil stiffness ratio, fill height, and pile spacing on the soil arching under pile settlement conditions. The research results show that reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will reduce differential settlement between piles and soil, but it will exacerbate overall settlement. The stiffness ratio has a significant impact on soil arching: appropriately reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will help to recover fill deformation and suppress the formation of passive soil arch; increasing the stiffness ratio will enhance the stability of the soil arching. In addition, when the soft soil stiffness <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>s</jats:sub> is low, pile settlement helps to enhance the soil arching, and the enhancement effect becomes more significant with an increase in fill height <jats:italic>H</jats:italic> and pile spacing <jats:italic>S</jats:italic>/<jats:italic>a</jats:italic>. When <jats:italic>k</jats:italic><jats:sub>s</jats:sub> is high, pile settlement weakens the soil arching, which intensifies with an increase in fill height but weakens with an increase in <jats:italic>S</jats:italic>/<jats:italic>a</jats:italic>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3940\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土拱是桩基路堤荷载传递的主要机制之一,土拱的演变模式因填土高度、桩间距、桩刚度和土刚度的不同而变化很大。然而,关于桩基沉降对土体起拱影响的研究相对较少,大多数研究仍采用固定拱脚的传统活门试验来检验土体起拱情况。因此,本研究建立了考虑桩基沉降的阻尼弹簧式活门数值模型,通过 52 组弹簧式活门试验和 1 组参考试验,系统研究了桩土刚度比、填土高度、桩间距等多种因素对桩基沉降条件下土体起拱的影响。研究结果表明,降低桩土刚度比可以减少桩土之间的差异沉降,但会加剧整体沉降。刚度比对土拱的影响很大:适当减小桩土刚度比有助于恢复填土变形,抑制被动土拱的形成;增大刚度比会增强土拱的稳定性。此外,当软土刚度 ks 较低时,桩基沉降有助于增强土拱度,并且随着填土高度 H 和桩间距 S/a 的增大,增强效果更加显著。当 ks 较高时,桩沉降会减弱土拱度,随着填土高度的增加,土拱度会增强,但随着 S/a 的增加,土拱度会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Study on Soil‐Arching Behavior in Pile‐Supported Embankments With Pile Settlement by Developed Damping Spring‐Based Trapdoor Model
Soil arching is one of the main mechanisms for load transfer in pile‐supported embankments, and the soil arching evolution patterns varied significantly depending on fill heights, pile spacings, pile stiffness, and soil stiffness. However, research on the effect of pile settlement on soil arching is relatively scarce, and most studies still use the traditional trapdoor test with a fixed arch foot to examine the soil arching. Therefore, this study establishes numerical models of a damping spring‐based trapdoor that considers pile settlement, and through 52 sets of spring‐based trapdoor tests and 1 set of reference tests, it systematically investigates the effects of various factors such as pile–soil stiffness ratio, fill height, and pile spacing on the soil arching under pile settlement conditions. The research results show that reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will reduce differential settlement between piles and soil, but it will exacerbate overall settlement. The stiffness ratio has a significant impact on soil arching: appropriately reducing the pile–soil stiffness ratio will help to recover fill deformation and suppress the formation of passive soil arch; increasing the stiffness ratio will enhance the stability of the soil arching. In addition, when the soft soil stiffness ks is low, pile settlement helps to enhance the soil arching, and the enhancement effect becomes more significant with an increase in fill height H and pile spacing S/a. When ks is high, pile settlement weakens the soil arching, which intensifies with an increase in fill height but weakens with an increase in S/a.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信