(再)想象城邦:观众参与作为后戏剧话语

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
William W. Lewis
{"title":"(再)想象城邦:观众参与作为后戏剧话语","authors":"William W. Lewis","doi":"10.1017/s0040557424000243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How much is enough? The relevance of this question comes from individual expectations regarding value. What is value and how does it manifest through our daily interactions? There is a qualitative difference between the concept of <span>value</span> and individual and collective <span>values</span>. Is there such a thing as a common good when it comes to either? Values are a social construct formed through a process of analysis, dialogue, and assessment within any given community. Though each individual's value system has varying degrees of difference, an agreed-upon system of values is created within and through communication, communion, and coalition. In contemporary societies, it seems the importance of unified community values has diminished in favor of the individual due to the rise of late capitalism, consumer culture, mediatization, political polarization, and the various signposts of neoliberalism. Postdramatic scholar Hans-Thies Lehmann states, “It is a fundamental fact of today's Western societies that all human experiences (life, eroticism, happiness, recognition) are tied to <span>commodities</span> or more precisely their consumption and possession (and not to a discourse).” Lehmann's assertion leads me to ask some striking questions relating to the theatrical practices that guide this essay. Namely, how have large-scale social systems of the contemporary era increasingly divested from community values, instead opting for smaller and smaller factions of identification? Without belief in a larger community good, what use is democracy?</p>","PeriodicalId":42777,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE SURVEY","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)Imagining the Polis: Audience Participation as Postdramatic Discourse\",\"authors\":\"William W. Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0040557424000243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>How much is enough? The relevance of this question comes from individual expectations regarding value. What is value and how does it manifest through our daily interactions? There is a qualitative difference between the concept of <span>value</span> and individual and collective <span>values</span>. Is there such a thing as a common good when it comes to either? Values are a social construct formed through a process of analysis, dialogue, and assessment within any given community. Though each individual's value system has varying degrees of difference, an agreed-upon system of values is created within and through communication, communion, and coalition. In contemporary societies, it seems the importance of unified community values has diminished in favor of the individual due to the rise of late capitalism, consumer culture, mediatization, political polarization, and the various signposts of neoliberalism. Postdramatic scholar Hans-Thies Lehmann states, “It is a fundamental fact of today's Western societies that all human experiences (life, eroticism, happiness, recognition) are tied to <span>commodities</span> or more precisely their consumption and possession (and not to a discourse).” Lehmann's assertion leads me to ask some striking questions relating to the theatrical practices that guide this essay. Namely, how have large-scale social systems of the contemporary era increasingly divested from community values, instead opting for smaller and smaller factions of identification? Without belief in a larger community good, what use is democracy?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE SURVEY\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE SURVEY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0040557424000243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE SURVEY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0040557424000243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多少才够?这个问题的相关性来自于个人对价值的期望。什么是价值,它是如何通过我们的日常互动体现出来的?价值观念与个人和集体价值有着质的区别。当涉及到这两者时,是否存在所谓的共同利益?价值观是一种社会建构,是在任何特定群体中通过分析、对话和评估过程形成的。虽然每个人的价值体系都有不同程度的差异,但一个共识的价值体系是在沟通、交流和联合中形成的。在当代社会中,由于晚期资本主义、消费文化、媒介化、政治两极分化和新自由主义的各种标志的兴起,统一的社区价值观的重要性似乎已经减弱,而有利于个人。后戏剧学者汉斯-蒂斯·莱曼(Hans-Thies Lehmann)指出:“当今西方社会的一个基本事实是,所有人类体验(生活、色情、幸福、认可)都与商品有关,或者更准确地说,与商品的消费和占有有关(而不是与话语有关)。”莱曼的断言让我提出了一些引人注目的问题,这些问题与指导本文的戏剧实践有关。也就是说,当代的大规模社会体系是如何逐渐脱离社区价值,转而选择越来越小的认同派别的?没有对更大的社区利益的信念,民主有什么用?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
(Re)Imagining the Polis: Audience Participation as Postdramatic Discourse

How much is enough? The relevance of this question comes from individual expectations regarding value. What is value and how does it manifest through our daily interactions? There is a qualitative difference between the concept of value and individual and collective values. Is there such a thing as a common good when it comes to either? Values are a social construct formed through a process of analysis, dialogue, and assessment within any given community. Though each individual's value system has varying degrees of difference, an agreed-upon system of values is created within and through communication, communion, and coalition. In contemporary societies, it seems the importance of unified community values has diminished in favor of the individual due to the rise of late capitalism, consumer culture, mediatization, political polarization, and the various signposts of neoliberalism. Postdramatic scholar Hans-Thies Lehmann states, “It is a fundamental fact of today's Western societies that all human experiences (life, eroticism, happiness, recognition) are tied to commodities or more precisely their consumption and possession (and not to a discourse).” Lehmann's assertion leads me to ask some striking questions relating to the theatrical practices that guide this essay. Namely, how have large-scale social systems of the contemporary era increasingly divested from community values, instead opting for smaller and smaller factions of identification? Without belief in a larger community good, what use is democracy?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEATRE SURVEY
THEATRE SURVEY THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信