Steele McCulley, Jace Lapierre, Irving Delgado-Arellanes, Joseph Rund, Courtney Seffker, Qiang An, Robert W Westermann
{"title":"术中关节内吗啡对髋关节镜术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗的影响。","authors":"Steele McCulley, Jace Lapierre, Irving Delgado-Arellanes, Joseph Rund, Courtney Seffker, Qiang An, Robert W Westermann","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of intraoperative intra-articular morphine has been suggested to lower postoperative pain scores and opioid use. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular morphine with 0.75% ropivacaine when compared to the use of ropivacaine alone. Our study's purpose was to determine the efficacy of intra-articular morphine on pain control, opioid consumption, and discharge times in the immediate post-operative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 100 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between 2021 to 2023. 50 patients who received 5 mg of intra-articular morphine injections intraoperatively were identified, and 50 who did not. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy without repair, revision surgery, or combined hip arthroscopy and femoral osteotomy or periacetabular osteotomy were excluded. Demographics including age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI, and tobacco use were recorded. Procedural factors included total operative time, traction time, and time to discharge. Pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the initial Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and final VAS score prior to discharge were recorded. Total acute opioid use was recorded using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during post-operation to discharge. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square statistics on continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistically significant level was set as p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between demographics, operative time, traction time, or discharge time. The median age of patients in the non-morphine group was 29 (48% M, 52% F) and 24.5 (34% M, 66% F) in the morphine group. Differences between the morphine and non-morphine group in postoperative VAS scores were insignificant, with the mean initial PACU VAS scores (4.6 ± 3.0 vs 5.5 ± 3.0) and mean final PACU VAS scores (3.5 ± 1.9 vs 3.7 ± 1.4) respectively. Postoperative MME consumption difference was also insignificant (17.1 ± 7.4 vs 17.9 ± 7.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative intra-articular morphine injection with ropivacaine does not provide a significant reduction in acute postoperative pain scores or opioid use when compared to ropivacaine use alone. Further investigation into the efficacy of intra-articular morphine is warranted. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 2","pages":"112-116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726484/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Intraoperative Intra-Articular Morphine on Post-Operative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Hip Arthroscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Steele McCulley, Jace Lapierre, Irving Delgado-Arellanes, Joseph Rund, Courtney Seffker, Qiang An, Robert W Westermann\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of intraoperative intra-articular morphine has been suggested to lower postoperative pain scores and opioid use. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular morphine with 0.75% ropivacaine when compared to the use of ropivacaine alone. Our study's purpose was to determine the efficacy of intra-articular morphine on pain control, opioid consumption, and discharge times in the immediate post-operative period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 100 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between 2021 to 2023. 50 patients who received 5 mg of intra-articular morphine injections intraoperatively were identified, and 50 who did not. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy without repair, revision surgery, or combined hip arthroscopy and femoral osteotomy or periacetabular osteotomy were excluded. Demographics including age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI, and tobacco use were recorded. Procedural factors included total operative time, traction time, and time to discharge. Pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the initial Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and final VAS score prior to discharge were recorded. Total acute opioid use was recorded using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during post-operation to discharge. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square statistics on continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistically significant level was set as p<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between demographics, operative time, traction time, or discharge time. The median age of patients in the non-morphine group was 29 (48% M, 52% F) and 24.5 (34% M, 66% F) in the morphine group. Differences between the morphine and non-morphine group in postoperative VAS scores were insignificant, with the mean initial PACU VAS scores (4.6 ± 3.0 vs 5.5 ± 3.0) and mean final PACU VAS scores (3.5 ± 1.9 vs 3.7 ± 1.4) respectively. Postoperative MME consumption difference was also insignificant (17.1 ± 7.4 vs 17.9 ± 7.3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative intra-articular morphine injection with ropivacaine does not provide a significant reduction in acute postoperative pain scores or opioid use when compared to ropivacaine use alone. Further investigation into the efficacy of intra-articular morphine is warranted. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"112-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726484/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术中使用关节内吗啡被认为可以降低术后疼痛评分和阿片类药物的使用。我们试图评价0.75%罗哌卡因关节内吗啡与单独使用罗哌卡因的有效性。本研究的目的是确定关节内吗啡对术后疼痛控制、阿片类药物消耗和出院时间的疗效。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2021年至2023年期间接受髋关节镜修复股髋臼撞击(FAI)的100例患者的图表。术中接受5mg关节内吗啡注射的患者50例,未接受5mg关节内吗啡注射的患者50例。不进行修复、翻修手术或联合髋关节镜和股骨截骨术或髋臼周围截骨术的患者被排除在外。人口统计数据包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、体重指数和烟草使用记录。程序因素包括总手术时间、牵引时间和出院时间。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛评分,并记录麻醉后护理单元(PACU)初始评分和出院前最终VAS评分。术后至出院期间,使用吗啡毫克当量(MME)记录急性阿片类药物使用总量。我们对连续变量和分类变量分别采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方统计。结果:人口统计学、手术时间、牵引时间、出院时间之间无统计学差异。非吗啡组患者中位年龄为29岁(48% M, 52% F),吗啡组患者中位年龄为24.5岁(34% M, 66% F)。吗啡组与非吗啡组术后VAS评分差异无统计学意义,PACU VAS初始平均评分(4.6±3.0 vs 5.5±3.0),PACU VAS最终平均评分(3.5±1.9 vs 3.7±1.4)。术后MME消耗差异也不显著(17.1±7.4 vs 17.9±7.3)。结论:与单独使用罗哌卡因相比,术中关节内注射吗啡与罗哌卡因并不能显著降低急性术后疼痛评分或阿片类药物的使用。进一步研究关节内吗啡的疗效是有必要的。证据水平:III。
Efficacy of Intraoperative Intra-Articular Morphine on Post-Operative Pain and Opioid Consumption Following Hip Arthroscopy.
Background: The use of intraoperative intra-articular morphine has been suggested to lower postoperative pain scores and opioid use. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular morphine with 0.75% ropivacaine when compared to the use of ropivacaine alone. Our study's purpose was to determine the efficacy of intra-articular morphine on pain control, opioid consumption, and discharge times in the immediate post-operative period.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 100 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with repair for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) between 2021 to 2023. 50 patients who received 5 mg of intra-articular morphine injections intraoperatively were identified, and 50 who did not. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy without repair, revision surgery, or combined hip arthroscopy and femoral osteotomy or periacetabular osteotomy were excluded. Demographics including age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI, and tobacco use were recorded. Procedural factors included total operative time, traction time, and time to discharge. Pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the initial Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and final VAS score prior to discharge were recorded. Total acute opioid use was recorded using morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during post-operation to discharge. We used the Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square statistics on continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistically significant level was set as p<0.05.
Results: No significant differences were found between demographics, operative time, traction time, or discharge time. The median age of patients in the non-morphine group was 29 (48% M, 52% F) and 24.5 (34% M, 66% F) in the morphine group. Differences between the morphine and non-morphine group in postoperative VAS scores were insignificant, with the mean initial PACU VAS scores (4.6 ± 3.0 vs 5.5 ± 3.0) and mean final PACU VAS scores (3.5 ± 1.9 vs 3.7 ± 1.4) respectively. Postoperative MME consumption difference was also insignificant (17.1 ± 7.4 vs 17.9 ± 7.3).
Conclusion: Intraoperative intra-articular morphine injection with ropivacaine does not provide a significant reduction in acute postoperative pain scores or opioid use when compared to ropivacaine use alone. Further investigation into the efficacy of intra-articular morphine is warranted. Level of Evidence: III.