盆腔和髋臼手术围术期输血中术中细胞抢救的疗效:一项匹配队列分析。

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Gireesh B Reddy, Neil V Mohile, Jessica D Leuchter, Rajan R Murgai, Joseph S Geller, Akhil Sharma, Ramakanth R Yakkanti, James C Shaw
{"title":"盆腔和髋臼手术围术期输血中术中细胞抢救的疗效:一项匹配队列分析。","authors":"Gireesh B Reddy, Neil V Mohile, Jessica D Leuchter, Rajan R Murgai, Joseph S Geller, Akhil Sharma, Ramakanth R Yakkanti, James C Shaw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic fractures often result in traumatic and intraoperative blood loss. Cell salvage (CS) is a tool where autologous blood lost during surgery is collected and recycled with anticoagulation, centrifugation to separate red blood cells, and washing to be reinfused back to the patient. The purpose of this study was to investigate our experience with CS in pelvic and acetabular surgery and its relationship to perioperative transfusion requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, adult patients who underwent pelvic ring or acetabular open reduction internal fixation between 01/2014-11/2021 at a tertiary care level-one trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Peri-operative outcomes including pre-/post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit, estimated blood loss, use of CS, and perioperative blood transfusions were collected. Pooled two-sample t-tests were used to compare parametric populations while Fischer's exact test or Pearson's Chi squared test were used for nonparametric data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>402 patients were included (85 in the CS group and 317 in the non-CS group). Patients had a higher proportion of acetabular fractures. The use of CS was associated with longer operative time (366 mins vs. 269 mins, p<0.0001), EBL (911 mL vs. 473 mL, p<0.0001), and allogenic transfusion of RBC units intraoperatively (1.75 u vs. 1.28 u, p=0.0442) and postoperatively (1.38 u vs. 0.66 u, p<0.0012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CS was associated with higher total and postoperative allogenic units transfused. Future prospective randomized trials would help to further delineate the risks and benefits of CS utilization in surgical treatment of these fractures. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 2","pages":"149-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Intraoperative Cell Salvage on Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Pelvic and Acetabular Surgery: A Matched Cohort Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gireesh B Reddy, Neil V Mohile, Jessica D Leuchter, Rajan R Murgai, Joseph S Geller, Akhil Sharma, Ramakanth R Yakkanti, James C Shaw\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic fractures often result in traumatic and intraoperative blood loss. Cell salvage (CS) is a tool where autologous blood lost during surgery is collected and recycled with anticoagulation, centrifugation to separate red blood cells, and washing to be reinfused back to the patient. The purpose of this study was to investigate our experience with CS in pelvic and acetabular surgery and its relationship to perioperative transfusion requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After institutional review board approval, adult patients who underwent pelvic ring or acetabular open reduction internal fixation between 01/2014-11/2021 at a tertiary care level-one trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Peri-operative outcomes including pre-/post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit, estimated blood loss, use of CS, and perioperative blood transfusions were collected. Pooled two-sample t-tests were used to compare parametric populations while Fischer's exact test or Pearson's Chi squared test were used for nonparametric data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>402 patients were included (85 in the CS group and 317 in the non-CS group). Patients had a higher proportion of acetabular fractures. The use of CS was associated with longer operative time (366 mins vs. 269 mins, p<0.0001), EBL (911 mL vs. 473 mL, p<0.0001), and allogenic transfusion of RBC units intraoperatively (1.75 u vs. 1.28 u, p=0.0442) and postoperatively (1.38 u vs. 0.66 u, p<0.0012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of CS was associated with higher total and postoperative allogenic units transfused. Future prospective randomized trials would help to further delineate the risks and benefits of CS utilization in surgical treatment of these fractures. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"149-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726483/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Iowa orthopaedic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨盆骨折常导致外伤性和术中失血。细胞回收(CS)是一种收集手术过程中丢失的自体血液并经抗凝、离心分离红细胞和洗涤后再输回患者体内的工具。本研究的目的是探讨我们在骨盆和髋臼手术中CS的经验及其与围手术期输血需求的关系。方法:经机构审查委员会批准,回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2021年11月在三级护理一级创伤中心接受骨盆环或髋臼切开复位内固定的成人患者。收集围手术期结果,包括术前/术后血红蛋白和红细胞压积、估计失血量、CS的使用和围手术期输血。对参数总体采用合并双样本t检验,对非参数数据采用Fischer精确检验或Pearson卡方检验。结果:共纳入402例患者(CS组85例,非CS组317例)。患者髋臼骨折的比例较高。CS的使用与较长的手术时间相关(366分钟vs 269分钟)。结论:CS的使用与较高的总输血和术后同种异体输血单位相关。未来的前瞻性随机试验将有助于进一步描述手术治疗这些骨折时使用CS的风险和益处。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Intraoperative Cell Salvage on Perioperative Blood Transfusion in Pelvic and Acetabular Surgery: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Background: Pelvic fractures often result in traumatic and intraoperative blood loss. Cell salvage (CS) is a tool where autologous blood lost during surgery is collected and recycled with anticoagulation, centrifugation to separate red blood cells, and washing to be reinfused back to the patient. The purpose of this study was to investigate our experience with CS in pelvic and acetabular surgery and its relationship to perioperative transfusion requirements.

Methods: After institutional review board approval, adult patients who underwent pelvic ring or acetabular open reduction internal fixation between 01/2014-11/2021 at a tertiary care level-one trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Peri-operative outcomes including pre-/post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit, estimated blood loss, use of CS, and perioperative blood transfusions were collected. Pooled two-sample t-tests were used to compare parametric populations while Fischer's exact test or Pearson's Chi squared test were used for nonparametric data.

Results: 402 patients were included (85 in the CS group and 317 in the non-CS group). Patients had a higher proportion of acetabular fractures. The use of CS was associated with longer operative time (366 mins vs. 269 mins, p<0.0001), EBL (911 mL vs. 473 mL, p<0.0001), and allogenic transfusion of RBC units intraoperatively (1.75 u vs. 1.28 u, p=0.0442) and postoperatively (1.38 u vs. 0.66 u, p<0.0012).

Conclusion: The use of CS was associated with higher total and postoperative allogenic units transfused. Future prospective randomized trials would help to further delineate the risks and benefits of CS utilization in surgical treatment of these fractures. Level of Evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信