第三代青光眼超声乳化小梁微搭桥植入术。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zachary Vest, Nadia Alinaghizadeh, Connor Prendergast
{"title":"第三代青光眼超声乳化小梁微搭桥植入术。","authors":"Zachary Vest, Nadia Alinaghizadeh, Connor Prendergast","doi":"10.1007/s40123-024-01087-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective, consecutive, real-world case series assessed the efficacy and safety of third-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation (iStent infinite) with phacoemulsification in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with implantation of iStent infinite (containing three stents) by a single U.S. glaucoma surgeon. Outcomes through 12 months included mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications; proportions of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, ≤ 15 mmHg, or ≤ 12 mmHg; proportions of eyes on 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 topical glaucoma medications; adverse events; and secondary glaucoma procedures. Data are presented for the observed cohort of all available eyes at each time point and the consistent cohort of eyes with data at 12 months postoperative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 eyes with mild (66.1%) or moderate (33.9%) POAG underwent iStent infinite implantation between February 2023 and June 2024. In eyes with 12-month follow-up data (n = 32), mean IOP reduced from 18.1 ± 3.3 mmHg preoperatively to 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg at 12 months (23.8% reduction, p < 0.001), while mean number of medications reduced from 1.38 ± 0.91 to 1.06 ± 1.13 medications (23.2% reduction, p = 0.023). The proportions of eyes achieving IOP ≤ 18/15/12 mmHg increased from 53.1%/21.9%/3.1% preoperatively to 87.5%/75.0%/43.8% at 12 months, respectively (all p < 0.01). Adverse events were largely mild and transient; three eyes (< 3%) had secondary laser or micro-invasive glaucoma interventions due to IOP and/or medications above goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iStent infinite implantation with cataract surgery resulted in clinically and statistically significant IOP and medication reductions through 12 months postoperative, with favorable safety. This cohort constitutes one of the first and largest published datasets for this device in combination with cataract surgery in real-world usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":19623,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Implantation with Phacoemulsification for Glaucoma.\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Vest, Nadia Alinaghizadeh, Connor Prendergast\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40123-024-01087-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This retrospective, consecutive, real-world case series assessed the efficacy and safety of third-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation (iStent infinite) with phacoemulsification in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with implantation of iStent infinite (containing three stents) by a single U.S. glaucoma surgeon. Outcomes through 12 months included mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications; proportions of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, ≤ 15 mmHg, or ≤ 12 mmHg; proportions of eyes on 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 topical glaucoma medications; adverse events; and secondary glaucoma procedures. Data are presented for the observed cohort of all available eyes at each time point and the consistent cohort of eyes with data at 12 months postoperative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 121 eyes with mild (66.1%) or moderate (33.9%) POAG underwent iStent infinite implantation between February 2023 and June 2024. In eyes with 12-month follow-up data (n = 32), mean IOP reduced from 18.1 ± 3.3 mmHg preoperatively to 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg at 12 months (23.8% reduction, p < 0.001), while mean number of medications reduced from 1.38 ± 0.91 to 1.06 ± 1.13 medications (23.2% reduction, p = 0.023). The proportions of eyes achieving IOP ≤ 18/15/12 mmHg increased from 53.1%/21.9%/3.1% preoperatively to 87.5%/75.0%/43.8% at 12 months, respectively (all p < 0.01). Adverse events were largely mild and transient; three eyes (< 3%) had secondary laser or micro-invasive glaucoma interventions due to IOP and/or medications above goal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>iStent infinite implantation with cataract surgery resulted in clinically and statistically significant IOP and medication reductions through 12 months postoperative, with favorable safety. This cohort constitutes one of the first and largest published datasets for this device in combination with cataract surgery in real-world usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01087-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-024-01087-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:这项回顾性、连续性、真实世界病例系列研究评估了第三代小梁微旁路支架植入术(iStent infinite)与超声乳化术在轻度至中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者中的疗效和安全性:方法:患者在接受超声乳化术的同时,由一名美国青光眼外科医生为其植入 iStent infinite(包含三个支架)。12个月后的结果包括平均眼压(IOP)和用药情况;眼压≤18 mmHg、≤15 mmHg或≤12 mmHg的眼睛比例;使用0、1、2或≥3种局部青光眼药物的眼睛比例;不良事件;以及继发性青光眼手术。结果显示了每个时间点所有可用眼的观察组群数据和术后 12 个月的一致组群数据:2023年2月至2024年6月期间,共有121只患有轻度(66.1%)或中度(33.9%)POAG的眼睛接受了iStent infinite植入术。在有 12 个月随访数据的眼球中(n = 32),平均眼压从术前的 18.1 ± 3.3 mmHg 降至 12 个月时的 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg(降低 23.8%,p 结论:iStent 无限极植入术与白内障手术相结合,在临床和统计学上显著降低了眼压,术后 12 个月的用药量减少,安全性良好。该队列是该设备结合白内障手术实际应用的首批、也是最大的已发表数据集之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third-Generation Trabecular Micro-Bypass Implantation with Phacoemulsification for Glaucoma.

Introduction: This retrospective, consecutive, real-world case series assessed the efficacy and safety of third-generation trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation (iStent infinite) with phacoemulsification in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with implantation of iStent infinite (containing three stents) by a single U.S. glaucoma surgeon. Outcomes through 12 months included mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications; proportions of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, ≤ 15 mmHg, or ≤ 12 mmHg; proportions of eyes on 0, 1, 2, or ≥ 3 topical glaucoma medications; adverse events; and secondary glaucoma procedures. Data are presented for the observed cohort of all available eyes at each time point and the consistent cohort of eyes with data at 12 months postoperative.

Results: A total of 121 eyes with mild (66.1%) or moderate (33.9%) POAG underwent iStent infinite implantation between February 2023 and June 2024. In eyes with 12-month follow-up data (n = 32), mean IOP reduced from 18.1 ± 3.3 mmHg preoperatively to 13.8 ± 3.4 mmHg at 12 months (23.8% reduction, p < 0.001), while mean number of medications reduced from 1.38 ± 0.91 to 1.06 ± 1.13 medications (23.2% reduction, p = 0.023). The proportions of eyes achieving IOP ≤ 18/15/12 mmHg increased from 53.1%/21.9%/3.1% preoperatively to 87.5%/75.0%/43.8% at 12 months, respectively (all p < 0.01). Adverse events were largely mild and transient; three eyes (< 3%) had secondary laser or micro-invasive glaucoma interventions due to IOP and/or medications above goal.

Conclusions: iStent infinite implantation with cataract surgery resulted in clinically and statistically significant IOP and medication reductions through 12 months postoperative, with favorable safety. This cohort constitutes one of the first and largest published datasets for this device in combination with cataract surgery in real-world usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Ophthalmology and Therapy OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims and Scope Ophthalmology and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed (single-blind), and rapid publication journal. The scope of the journal is broad and will consider all scientifically sound research from preclinical, clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the use of ophthalmological therapies, devices, and surgical techniques. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports/series, trial protocols and short communications such as commentaries and editorials. Ophthalmology and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of quality research, which may be considered of insufficient interest by other journals. Rapid Publication The journal’s publication timelines aim for a rapid peer review of 2 weeks. If an article is accepted it will be published 3–4 weeks from acceptance. The rapid timelines are achieved through the combination of a dedicated in-house editorial team, who manage article workflow, and an extensive Editorial and Advisory Board who assist with peer review. This allows the journal to support the rapid dissemination of research, whilst still providing robust peer review. Combined with the journal’s open access model this allows for the rapid, efficient communication of the latest research and reviews, fostering the advancement of ophthalmic therapies. Open Access All articles published by Ophthalmology and Therapy are open access. Personal Service The journal’s dedicated in-house editorial team offer a personal “concierge service” meaning authors will always have an editorial contact able to update them on the status of their manuscript. The editorial team check all manuscripts to ensure that articles conform to the most recent COPE, GPP and ICMJE publishing guidelines. This supports the publication of ethically sound and transparent research. Digital Features and Plain Language Summaries Ophthalmology and Therapy offers a range of additional features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by key summary points, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand the scientific content and overall implications of the article. The journal also provides the option to include various types of digital features including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations. All additional features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. If you consider that your paper would benefit from the inclusion of a digital feature, please let us know. Our editorial team are able to create high-quality slide decks and infographics in-house, and video abstracts through our partner Research Square, and would be happy to assist in any way we can. For further information about digital features, please contact the journal editor (see ‘Contact the Journal’ for email address), and see the ‘Guidelines for digital features and plain language summaries’ document under ‘Submission guidelines’. For examples of digital features please visit our showcase page https://springerhealthcare.com/expertise/publishing-digital-features/ Publication Fees Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be required to pay the mandatory Rapid Service Fee of €5250/$6000/£4300. The journal will consider fee discounts and waivers for developing countries and this is decided on a case by case basis. Peer Review Process Upon submission, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team to ensure they fit within the aims and scope of the journal and are also checked for plagiarism. All suitable submissions are then subject to a comprehensive single-blind peer review. Reviewers are selected based on their relevant expertise and publication history in the subject area. The journal has an extensive pool of editorial and advisory board members who have been selected to assist with peer review based on the afore-mentioned criteria. At least two extensive reviews are required to make the editorial decision, with the exception of some article types such as Commentaries, Editorials, and Letters which are generally reviewed by one member of the Editorial Board. Where reviewer recommendations are conflicted, the editorial board will be contacted for further advice and a presiding decision. Manuscripts are then either accepted, rejected or authors are required to make major or minor revisions (both reviewer comments and editorial comments may need to be addressed). Once a revised manuscript is re-submitted, it is assessed along with the responses to reviewer comments and if it has been adequately revised it will be accepted for publication. Accepted manuscripts are then copyedited and typeset by the production team before online publication. Appeals against decisions following peer review are considered on a case-by-case basis and should be sent to the journal editor. Preprints We encourage posting of preprints of primary research manuscripts on preprint servers, authors’ or institutional websites, and open communications between researchers whether on community preprint servers or preprint commenting platforms. Posting of preprints is not considered prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration in our journals. Authors should disclose details of preprint posting during the submission process or at any other point during consideration in one of our journals. Once the manuscript is published, it is the author’s responsibility to ensure that the preprint record is updated with a publication reference, including the DOI and a URL link to the published version of the article on the journal website. Please follow the link for further information on preprint sharing: https://www.springer.com/gp/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-helpdesk/submission/1302#c16721550 Copyright Ophthalmology and Therapy''s content is published open access under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, which allows users to read, copy, distribute, and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited. The author assigns the exclusive right to any commercial use of the article to Springer. For more information about the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial License, click here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0. Contact For more information about the journal, including pre-submission enquiries, please contact christopher.vautrinot@springer.com.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信