吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影在直肠癌患者低位前切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
J Charbonneau, É Papillon-Dion, R Brière, N Singbo, A Legault-Dupuis, S Drolet, F Rouleau-Fournier, P Bouchard, A Bouchard, C Thibault, F Letarte
{"title":"吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影在直肠癌患者低位前切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"J Charbonneau, É Papillon-Dion, R Brière, N Singbo, A Legault-Dupuis, S Drolet, F Rouleau-Fournier, P Bouchard, A Bouchard, C Thibault, F Letarte","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03075-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate bowel perfusion is among risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Perfusion can be assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG) during colon resections. Possible benefits from its systematic use in high-risk patients with rectal cancer remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical modifications induced by ICG assessment during rectal cancer surgery and associated anastomotic leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective before and after cohort study was conducted in a single Canadian high-volume colorectal surgery center. Eligible patients were undergoing a low anterior resection for rectal cancer below 15 cm from the anal margin. Stapled and handsewn coloanal anastomoses were included. The experimental group was recruited prospectively, undergoing surgery using fluorescence angiography with ICG. The control group was built retrospectively from consecutive patients who had been operated on without ICG, prior to its implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each cohort included 113 patients. The use of ICG led to modifications from initial surgical plan in 10.6% of patients, with no occurrence of anastomotic leaks in this specific group. When comparing leak rates, using ICG seemed to be protective, but this could not be statistically proven, overall (13.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.07), nor for handsewn coloanal anastomoses (11.8% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.67). A lack of power could explain such non-significant results, especially with low overall anastomotic leak rates recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICG influenced ultimate proximal resection margin in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. It might be associated with reduced leak rates although not formally proven with this data. This technology is safe and easy to apply in high-volume colorectal centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study.\",\"authors\":\"J Charbonneau, É Papillon-Dion, R Brière, N Singbo, A Legault-Dupuis, S Drolet, F Rouleau-Fournier, P Bouchard, A Bouchard, C Thibault, F Letarte\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-024-03075-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate bowel perfusion is among risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Perfusion can be assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG) during colon resections. Possible benefits from its systematic use in high-risk patients with rectal cancer remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical modifications induced by ICG assessment during rectal cancer surgery and associated anastomotic leaks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective before and after cohort study was conducted in a single Canadian high-volume colorectal surgery center. Eligible patients were undergoing a low anterior resection for rectal cancer below 15 cm from the anal margin. Stapled and handsewn coloanal anastomoses were included. The experimental group was recruited prospectively, undergoing surgery using fluorescence angiography with ICG. The control group was built retrospectively from consecutive patients who had been operated on without ICG, prior to its implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each cohort included 113 patients. The use of ICG led to modifications from initial surgical plan in 10.6% of patients, with no occurrence of anastomotic leaks in this specific group. When comparing leak rates, using ICG seemed to be protective, but this could not be statistically proven, overall (13.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.07), nor for handsewn coloanal anastomoses (11.8% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.67). A lack of power could explain such non-significant results, especially with low overall anastomotic leak rates recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ICG influenced ultimate proximal resection margin in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. It might be associated with reduced leak rates although not formally proven with this data. This technology is safe and easy to apply in high-volume colorectal centers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03075-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03075-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠灌注不足是导致结直肠吻合口瘘的危险因素之一。在结肠切除术期间,灌注可以用吲哚菁绿荧光血管造影(ICG)来评估。在高危直肠癌患者中系统使用其可能带来的益处仍不一致。本研究旨在评估ICG评估在直肠癌手术中引起的手术改变和相关的吻合口瘘。方法:这项前瞻性的前后队列研究在加拿大一个大容量结直肠手术中心进行。符合条件的患者在距肛缘15厘米以下的直肠癌行低位前切除术。吻合术包括吻合术和手缝吻合术。实验组前瞻性招募,采用ICG荧光血管造影进行手术。对照组是在实施ICG之前连续未行ICG手术的患者中回顾性建立的。结果:每个队列包括113例患者。使用ICG导致10.6%的患者改变了最初的手术计划,在这一特定组中没有发生吻合口瘘。在比较泄漏率时,使用ICG似乎具有保护作用,但总体而言(13.3%对6.2%,p = 0.07),手工缝合的结肠肛管吻合术(11.8%对5.9%,p = 0.67)也没有统计学证明。缺乏动力可以解释这种不显著的结果,特别是记录的整体吻合口漏率很低。结论:ICG对临床相关病例的最终近端切除缘有影响。它可能与降低泄漏率有关,尽管没有正式的数据证明。该技术安全且易于应用于大容量结直肠中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study.

Background: Inadequate bowel perfusion is among risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Perfusion can be assessed with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG) during colon resections. Possible benefits from its systematic use in high-risk patients with rectal cancer remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical modifications induced by ICG assessment during rectal cancer surgery and associated anastomotic leaks.

Methods: This prospective before and after cohort study was conducted in a single Canadian high-volume colorectal surgery center. Eligible patients were undergoing a low anterior resection for rectal cancer below 15 cm from the anal margin. Stapled and handsewn coloanal anastomoses were included. The experimental group was recruited prospectively, undergoing surgery using fluorescence angiography with ICG. The control group was built retrospectively from consecutive patients who had been operated on without ICG, prior to its implementation.

Results: Each cohort included 113 patients. The use of ICG led to modifications from initial surgical plan in 10.6% of patients, with no occurrence of anastomotic leaks in this specific group. When comparing leak rates, using ICG seemed to be protective, but this could not be statistically proven, overall (13.3% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.07), nor for handsewn coloanal anastomoses (11.8% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.67). A lack of power could explain such non-significant results, especially with low overall anastomotic leak rates recorded.

Conclusion: ICG influenced ultimate proximal resection margin in a clinically relevant proportion of cases. It might be associated with reduced leak rates although not formally proven with this data. This technology is safe and easy to apply in high-volume colorectal centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信