印度、南非和格鲁吉亚检测结核病耐药性的下一代定向测序 (tNGS) 的成本效益:模型分析。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003
Suvesh Shrestha, Angelina Addae, Cecily Miller, Nazir Ismail, Alice Zwerling
{"title":"印度、南非和格鲁吉亚检测结核病耐药性的下一代定向测序 (tNGS) 的成本效益:模型分析。","authors":"Suvesh Shrestha, Angelina Addae, Cecily Miller, Nazir Ismail, Alice Zwerling","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is promising alternative to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB). This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of tNGS for the diagnosis of DR-TB across 3 settings: India, South Africa and Georgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To inform WHO guideline development group (GDG) on tNGS we developed a stochastic decision analysis model and assessed cost-effectiveness of tNGS for DST among rifampicin resistance individuals. We also assessed tNGS as initial test for TB drug resistance in bacteriologically confirmed TB. Diagnostic accuracy and cost data were sourced from a systematic review conducted for GDG, covering studies published until September 2022. The primary outcome was incremental cost (2021 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>tNGS when compared with in-country DST, tNGS proved cost-effective in South Africa (ICER: $15,619/DALY averted, WTP: $21,165) but not in Georgia (ICER: $18,375/DALY averted, WTP: $15,069). In India, tNGS dominated in-country DST practice, providing greater health impact at lower cost. When comparing tNGS with universal pDST, tNGS was dominated by pDST in all three countries. In Georgia, using tNGS as initial test for TB drug-resistance compared to Xpert MTB/Rif followed by pDST appeared cost-effective. Scenario with 50% reduction in tNGS test kit costs made tNGS cost-effective across all three countries, while a high Bedaquiline resistance prevalence (30%) led to a worsening cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>tNGS may be cost-effective in India, South Africa and Georgia when comprehensive DST is not routinely performed. Thus, existing DST practice and healthcare infrastructure should be considered before implementation and scale-up of tNGS.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization (2022/1249364-0).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"103003"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732181/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for detection of tuberculosis drug resistance in India, South Africa and Georgia: a modeling analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Suvesh Shrestha, Angelina Addae, Cecily Miller, Nazir Ismail, Alice Zwerling\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is promising alternative to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB). This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of tNGS for the diagnosis of DR-TB across 3 settings: India, South Africa and Georgia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To inform WHO guideline development group (GDG) on tNGS we developed a stochastic decision analysis model and assessed cost-effectiveness of tNGS for DST among rifampicin resistance individuals. We also assessed tNGS as initial test for TB drug resistance in bacteriologically confirmed TB. Diagnostic accuracy and cost data were sourced from a systematic review conducted for GDG, covering studies published until September 2022. The primary outcome was incremental cost (2021 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>tNGS when compared with in-country DST, tNGS proved cost-effective in South Africa (ICER: $15,619/DALY averted, WTP: $21,165) but not in Georgia (ICER: $18,375/DALY averted, WTP: $15,069). In India, tNGS dominated in-country DST practice, providing greater health impact at lower cost. When comparing tNGS with universal pDST, tNGS was dominated by pDST in all three countries. In Georgia, using tNGS as initial test for TB drug-resistance compared to Xpert MTB/Rif followed by pDST appeared cost-effective. Scenario with 50% reduction in tNGS test kit costs made tNGS cost-effective across all three countries, while a high Bedaquiline resistance prevalence (30%) led to a worsening cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>tNGS may be cost-effective in India, South Africa and Georgia when comprehensive DST is not routinely performed. Thus, existing DST practice and healthcare infrastructure should be considered before implementation and scale-up of tNGS.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization (2022/1249364-0).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"103003\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732181/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新一代靶向测序(Targeted generation sequencing, tNGS)有望替代表型药敏试验(phenotypydrug - susceptibility testing, pDST)检测耐药结核病(DRTB)。本研究探讨了在印度、南非和格鲁吉亚这三个国家使用tNGS诊断耐药结核病的潜在成本效益。方法:为了向世卫组织指南制定小组(GDG)通报tNGS,我们开发了一个随机决策分析模型,并评估了在利福平耐药个体中tNGS治疗DST的成本效益。我们还评估了tNGS作为细菌学证实的结核病耐药的初始试验。诊断准确性和成本数据来自为GDG进行的系统评价,涵盖截至2022年9月发表的研究。主要结局是每个避免的残疾调整生命年(DALY)的增量成本(2021美元)。研究结果:与国内DST相比,tNGS在南非被证明具有成本效益(ICER: 15,619美元/避免DALY, WTP: 21,165美元),但在格鲁吉亚则不然(ICER: 18,375美元/避免DALY, WTP: 15,069美元)。在印度,tNGS在国内DST实践中占主导地位,以较低的成本提供更大的健康影响。当将tNGS与通用pDST进行比较时,三个国家的tNGS都以pDST为主。在格鲁吉亚,与Xpert MTB/Rif之后采用pDST相比,使用tNGS作为结核病耐药的初步检测方法似乎具有成本效益。tNGS检测试剂盒成本降低50%的情景使tNGS在所有三个国家具有成本效益,而高贝达喹啉耐药性流行率(30%)导致成本效益恶化。解释:在印度、南非和格鲁吉亚,当不常规进行全面DST时,tNGS可能具有成本效益。因此,在实施和扩大tNGS之前,应该考虑现有的DST实践和医疗保健基础设施。资助:世界卫生组织全球结核病规划(2022/1249364-0)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-effectiveness of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) for detection of tuberculosis drug resistance in India, South Africa and Georgia: a modeling analysis.

Background: Targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) is promising alternative to phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) for detecting drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB). This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of tNGS for the diagnosis of DR-TB across 3 settings: India, South Africa and Georgia.

Methods: To inform WHO guideline development group (GDG) on tNGS we developed a stochastic decision analysis model and assessed cost-effectiveness of tNGS for DST among rifampicin resistance individuals. We also assessed tNGS as initial test for TB drug resistance in bacteriologically confirmed TB. Diagnostic accuracy and cost data were sourced from a systematic review conducted for GDG, covering studies published until September 2022. The primary outcome was incremental cost (2021 US$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted.

Findings: tNGS when compared with in-country DST, tNGS proved cost-effective in South Africa (ICER: $15,619/DALY averted, WTP: $21,165) but not in Georgia (ICER: $18,375/DALY averted, WTP: $15,069). In India, tNGS dominated in-country DST practice, providing greater health impact at lower cost. When comparing tNGS with universal pDST, tNGS was dominated by pDST in all three countries. In Georgia, using tNGS as initial test for TB drug-resistance compared to Xpert MTB/Rif followed by pDST appeared cost-effective. Scenario with 50% reduction in tNGS test kit costs made tNGS cost-effective across all three countries, while a high Bedaquiline resistance prevalence (30%) led to a worsening cost-effectiveness.

Interpretation: tNGS may be cost-effective in India, South Africa and Georgia when comprehensive DST is not routinely performed. Thus, existing DST practice and healthcare infrastructure should be considered before implementation and scale-up of tNGS.

Funding: Global Tuberculosis Program, World Health Organization (2022/1249364-0).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信