关于瑞士公众对使用化学、数字和机械除草措施生产的食品的接受程度和可持续性看法的数据,以及信息来源对农业技术看法的影响。

IF 1 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Jeanine Ammann , Nadja El Benni , Sandie Masson , Rita Saleh
{"title":"关于瑞士公众对使用化学、数字和机械除草措施生产的食品的接受程度和可持续性看法的数据,以及信息来源对农业技术看法的影响。","authors":"Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni ,&nbsp;Sandie Masson ,&nbsp;Rita Saleh","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2024.111212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article describes data from an online survey conducted with the Swiss public from the two biggest language regions (German and French) in Switzerland. The survey was conducted in February 2023. Participants were recruited through a professional panel provider and quotas were used for age, gender and language region. The final sample contained 485 respondents. In the first part of the survey, respondents provided basic sociodemographic information. In the second part, their sustainability perceptions regarding four different weed management practices (full-surface spraying, hoeing machine, spot spraying and precise spraying) were investigated. Respondents were then randomly assigned to one of five experiment groups, in which information on a hoeing and a milking robot was presented, using 5 different information sources (male/female farmer, male/female scientist, no source). Technology perception was assessed using several questions and aspects (e.g. perception of economic, environmental and social sustainability). Finally, respondents answered questions assessing their attitudes towards the perception of farmers, food technology neophobia, chemophobia and the importance of naturalness. The survey can be used and adapted to different contents, aiming to investigate public perception of smart farming technologies and the influence of information sources on technology perception.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10973,"journal":{"name":"Data in Brief","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 111212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data on Swiss public's acceptance and sustainability perceptions of food produced with chemical, digital and mechanical weed control measures and the influence of information source on technology perception in agriculture\",\"authors\":\"Jeanine Ammann ,&nbsp;Nadja El Benni ,&nbsp;Sandie Masson ,&nbsp;Rita Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dib.2024.111212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article describes data from an online survey conducted with the Swiss public from the two biggest language regions (German and French) in Switzerland. The survey was conducted in February 2023. Participants were recruited through a professional panel provider and quotas were used for age, gender and language region. The final sample contained 485 respondents. In the first part of the survey, respondents provided basic sociodemographic information. In the second part, their sustainability perceptions regarding four different weed management practices (full-surface spraying, hoeing machine, spot spraying and precise spraying) were investigated. Respondents were then randomly assigned to one of five experiment groups, in which information on a hoeing and a milking robot was presented, using 5 different information sources (male/female farmer, male/female scientist, no source). Technology perception was assessed using several questions and aspects (e.g. perception of economic, environmental and social sustainability). Finally, respondents answered questions assessing their attitudes towards the perception of farmers, food technology neophobia, chemophobia and the importance of naturalness. The survey can be used and adapted to different contents, aiming to investigate public perception of smart farming technologies and the influence of information sources on technology perception.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Data in Brief\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Data in Brief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340924011740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data in Brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340924011740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文描述了一项对瑞士两个最大的语言区(德语和法语)的瑞士公众进行的在线调查的数据。该调查于2023年2月进行。参与者通过专业小组提供者招募,并根据年龄、性别和语言区域使用配额。最终样本包含485名受访者。在调查的第一部分,受访者提供了基本的社会人口统计信息。在第二部分,他们对四种不同的杂草管理方法(全表面喷洒、锄机喷洒、现场喷洒和精确喷洒)的可持续性看法进行了调查。然后将受访者随机分配到五个实验组中的一个,其中使用5个不同的信息源(男性/女性农民,男性/女性科学家,无来源)提供锄地和挤奶机器人的信息。利用若干问题和方面(例如对经济、环境和社会可持续性的看法)评估技术感知。最后,受访者回答了一些问题,评估他们对农民、食品技术新恐惧症、化学恐惧症和自然重要性的看法。该调查可以根据不同的内容进行使用和调整,旨在调查公众对智慧农业技术的认知以及信息来源对技术认知的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data on Swiss public's acceptance and sustainability perceptions of food produced with chemical, digital and mechanical weed control measures and the influence of information source on technology perception in agriculture
This article describes data from an online survey conducted with the Swiss public from the two biggest language regions (German and French) in Switzerland. The survey was conducted in February 2023. Participants were recruited through a professional panel provider and quotas were used for age, gender and language region. The final sample contained 485 respondents. In the first part of the survey, respondents provided basic sociodemographic information. In the second part, their sustainability perceptions regarding four different weed management practices (full-surface spraying, hoeing machine, spot spraying and precise spraying) were investigated. Respondents were then randomly assigned to one of five experiment groups, in which information on a hoeing and a milking robot was presented, using 5 different information sources (male/female farmer, male/female scientist, no source). Technology perception was assessed using several questions and aspects (e.g. perception of economic, environmental and social sustainability). Finally, respondents answered questions assessing their attitudes towards the perception of farmers, food technology neophobia, chemophobia and the importance of naturalness. The survey can be used and adapted to different contents, aiming to investigate public perception of smart farming technologies and the influence of information sources on technology perception.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Data in Brief
Data in Brief MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
996
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Data in Brief provides a way for researchers to easily share and reuse each other''s datasets by publishing data articles that: -Thoroughly describe your data, facilitating reproducibility. -Make your data, which is often buried in supplementary material, easier to find. -Increase traffic towards associated research articles and data, leading to more citations. -Open up doors for new collaborations. Because you never know what data will be useful to someone else, Data in Brief welcomes submissions that describe data from all research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信