利来替尼对斑秃患者眉毛和睫毛评估影响的人群暴露反应分析。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Yuchen Wang, Yeamin Huh, Alexandre Lejeune
{"title":"利来替尼对斑秃患者眉毛和睫毛评估影响的人群暴露反应分析。","authors":"Yuchen Wang,&nbsp;Yeamin Huh,&nbsp;Alexandre Lejeune","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ritlecitinib is an orally bioavailable, small molecule that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a once-daily oral treatment option for people 12 years of age and older with severe alopecia areata. This article assessed the exposure–response (ER) relationship of eyebrow and eyelash assessment (EBA/ELA) scores on ritlecitinib and compared them to the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (primary endpoint) ER relationship on ritlecitinib. EBA and ELA both are numeric rating scales (NRS) with four levels (0 the most severe, 3 the normal). Longitudinal ER modeling with ordinal regression was conducted to describe ritlecitinib efficacy regarding the hair regrowth in eyebrows and eyelashes separately. The average concentration in the time interval between two adjacent EBA/ELA records was used as the exposure metric. The developed models described the longitudinal EBA/ELA profile and the responder rates adequately. The ER models and the model-based simulations implied that the tested doses in the phase IIb/III clinical trial are in the ascending region, but the magnitude of loading dose effect on earlier efficacy is different across the efficacy endpoints of EBA, ELA, and SALT scores (which could be explained by the estimated <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>E</mi>\n <msub>\n <mi>C</mi>\n <mn>50</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n </semantics></math> [concentration at half maximum effect]). The established longitudinal ER relationships supported the selection of 50 mg dose for overall Alopecia areata (AA) patients with impaired eyebrow and eyelash hairs. The presented analysis using the ordinal regression model can be utilized in any ER analysis where PD response is an ordinal categorical variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":"14 2","pages":"389-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Population exposure–response analysis of the effect of ritlecitinib on eyebrow assessment and eyelash assessment in patients with alopecia areata\",\"authors\":\"Yuchen Wang,&nbsp;Yeamin Huh,&nbsp;Alexandre Lejeune\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.13283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Ritlecitinib is an orally bioavailable, small molecule that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a once-daily oral treatment option for people 12 years of age and older with severe alopecia areata. This article assessed the exposure–response (ER) relationship of eyebrow and eyelash assessment (EBA/ELA) scores on ritlecitinib and compared them to the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (primary endpoint) ER relationship on ritlecitinib. EBA and ELA both are numeric rating scales (NRS) with four levels (0 the most severe, 3 the normal). Longitudinal ER modeling with ordinal regression was conducted to describe ritlecitinib efficacy regarding the hair regrowth in eyebrows and eyelashes separately. The average concentration in the time interval between two adjacent EBA/ELA records was used as the exposure metric. The developed models described the longitudinal EBA/ELA profile and the responder rates adequately. The ER models and the model-based simulations implied that the tested doses in the phase IIb/III clinical trial are in the ascending region, but the magnitude of loading dose effect on earlier efficacy is different across the efficacy endpoints of EBA, ELA, and SALT scores (which could be explained by the estimated <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>E</mi>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>C</mi>\\n <mn>50</mn>\\n </msub>\\n </mrow>\\n </semantics></math> [concentration at half maximum effect]). The established longitudinal ER relationships supported the selection of 50 mg dose for overall Alopecia areata (AA) patients with impaired eyebrow and eyelash hairs. The presented analysis using the ordinal regression model can be utilized in any ER analysis where PD response is an ordinal categorical variable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"389-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp4.13283\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp4.13283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Ritlecitinib是一种口服生物可利用的小分子药物,已被美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准为12岁及以上严重斑秃患者的每日一次口服治疗选择。本文评估了利来替尼治疗后眉毛和睫毛评估(EBA/ELA)评分的暴露-反应(ER)关系,并将其与利来替尼治疗后脱发严重程度评估工具(SALT)评分(主要终点)的暴露-反应(ER)关系进行比较。EBA和ELA都是数字评定量表(NRS),分为四个级别(0为最严重,3为正常)。采用纵向ER模型和有序回归分别描述利来替尼对眉毛和睫毛毛发再生的疗效。两个相邻的EBA/ELA记录之间的时间间隔内的平均浓度作为暴露度量。开发的模型充分描述了纵向EBA/ELA剖面和响应率。ER模型和基于模型的模拟表明,IIb/III期临床试验的测试剂量处于上升区域,但在EBA、ELA和SALT评分的疗效终点上,负荷剂量对早期疗效的影响程度不同(这可以用估计的E C 50 $$ E{C}_{50} $$[最大效果一半时的浓度]来解释)。已建立的纵向ER关系支持选择50 mg剂量治疗眉、睫毛受损的全发性斑秃(AA)患者。使用有序回归模型的分析可以用于任何ER分析,其中PD响应是一个有序分类变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Population exposure–response analysis of the effect of ritlecitinib on eyebrow assessment and eyelash assessment in patients with alopecia areata

Population exposure–response analysis of the effect of ritlecitinib on eyebrow assessment and eyelash assessment in patients with alopecia areata

Ritlecitinib is an orally bioavailable, small molecule that has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a once-daily oral treatment option for people 12 years of age and older with severe alopecia areata. This article assessed the exposure–response (ER) relationship of eyebrow and eyelash assessment (EBA/ELA) scores on ritlecitinib and compared them to the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (primary endpoint) ER relationship on ritlecitinib. EBA and ELA both are numeric rating scales (NRS) with four levels (0 the most severe, 3 the normal). Longitudinal ER modeling with ordinal regression was conducted to describe ritlecitinib efficacy regarding the hair regrowth in eyebrows and eyelashes separately. The average concentration in the time interval between two adjacent EBA/ELA records was used as the exposure metric. The developed models described the longitudinal EBA/ELA profile and the responder rates adequately. The ER models and the model-based simulations implied that the tested doses in the phase IIb/III clinical trial are in the ascending region, but the magnitude of loading dose effect on earlier efficacy is different across the efficacy endpoints of EBA, ELA, and SALT scores (which could be explained by the estimated E C 50 [concentration at half maximum effect]). The established longitudinal ER relationships supported the selection of 50 mg dose for overall Alopecia areata (AA) patients with impaired eyebrow and eyelash hairs. The presented analysis using the ordinal regression model can be utilized in any ER analysis where PD response is an ordinal categorical variable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信