Susanna S van Wyk, Ntombifuthi Blose, Lester Kapanda-Phiri, Mareli Claassens, Taryn Young
{"title":"社区范围肺结核筛查的有效性:一项系统评价。","authors":"Susanna S van Wyk, Ntombifuthi Blose, Lester Kapanda-Phiri, Mareli Claassens, Taryn Young","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of community-wide screening for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in high-burden areas by analysing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The review focused on interventions offering TB screening to entire communities, comparing them to standard care or alternative approaches. The main outcome assessed was microbiologically confirmed TB diagnoses, including rates and prevalence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and trial registries up to 27 May 2024, without language restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate. Results were not pooled. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO: CRD42023453356. We included six cluster-RCTs after screening 2460 titles/abstracts and 86 full-text articles. The evidence for symptom screening was very uncertain. We found that sputum smear microscopy screening may result in little to no difference in the prevalence of culture-confirmed TB (n = 962,655, RR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.86-1.38, 1 RCT, low certainty evidence). Community-wide nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) screening probably reduces the prevalence of NAAT-positive TB (n = 105,108, RR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78, 1 RCT, moderate certainty evidence). Community-wide screening for pulmonary TB may reduce TB prevalence if done annually with an accurate screening test and high coverage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"103010"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731502/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of community-wide screening for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Susanna S van Wyk, Ntombifuthi Blose, Lester Kapanda-Phiri, Mareli Claassens, Taryn Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of community-wide screening for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in high-burden areas by analysing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The review focused on interventions offering TB screening to entire communities, comparing them to standard care or alternative approaches. The main outcome assessed was microbiologically confirmed TB diagnoses, including rates and prevalence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and trial registries up to 27 May 2024, without language restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate. Results were not pooled. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO: CRD42023453356. We included six cluster-RCTs after screening 2460 titles/abstracts and 86 full-text articles. The evidence for symptom screening was very uncertain. We found that sputum smear microscopy screening may result in little to no difference in the prevalence of culture-confirmed TB (n = 962,655, RR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.86-1.38, 1 RCT, low certainty evidence). Community-wide nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) screening probably reduces the prevalence of NAAT-positive TB (n = 105,108, RR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78, 1 RCT, moderate certainty evidence). Community-wide screening for pulmonary TB may reduce TB prevalence if done annually with an accurate screening test and high coverage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"103010\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11731502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103010\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本系统综述通过分析随机对照试验(RCTs),评估了在高负担地区开展社区范围肺结核筛查的有效性。该综述侧重于为整个社区提供结核病筛查的干预措施,并将其与标准治疗或替代方法进行比较。评估的主要结果是微生物学证实的结核病诊断,包括发病率和患病率。我们检索了截至2024年5月27日的MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、WHO Global Index Medicus、Web of Science和试验注册库,没有语言限制。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估一式两份。结果没有汇总。使用GRADE评估证据的确定性。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42023453356。在筛选了2460篇标题/摘要和86篇全文文章后,我们纳入了6个集群随机对照试验。症状筛查的证据非常不确定。我们发现,痰涂片镜检可能导致培养确诊结核病的患病率几乎没有差异(n = 962,655, RR 1.09;95% CI: 0.86-1.38, 1项随机对照试验,低确定性证据)。社区范围内核酸扩增试验(NAAT)筛查可能降低NAAT阳性结核病的患病率(n = 105,108, RR 0.56;95% CI: 0.40-0.78, 1项随机对照试验,中等确定性证据)。如果每年进行一次准确的筛查试验和高覆盖率的社区范围肺结核筛查,可能会降低结核病患病率。
The effectiveness of community-wide screening for pulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review.
This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of community-wide screening for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in high-burden areas by analysing randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The review focused on interventions offering TB screening to entire communities, comparing them to standard care or alternative approaches. The main outcome assessed was microbiologically confirmed TB diagnoses, including rates and prevalence. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO Global Index Medicus, Web of Science, and trial registries up to 27 May 2024, without language restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate. Results were not pooled. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. PROSPERO: CRD42023453356. We included six cluster-RCTs after screening 2460 titles/abstracts and 86 full-text articles. The evidence for symptom screening was very uncertain. We found that sputum smear microscopy screening may result in little to no difference in the prevalence of culture-confirmed TB (n = 962,655, RR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.86-1.38, 1 RCT, low certainty evidence). Community-wide nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) screening probably reduces the prevalence of NAAT-positive TB (n = 105,108, RR 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78, 1 RCT, moderate certainty evidence). Community-wide screening for pulmonary TB may reduce TB prevalence if done annually with an accurate screening test and high coverage.
期刊介绍:
eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.