初级保健医生对2型糖尿病患者治疗负担的反应:中国定性视频分析

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kai Lin, Mi Yao, Lesley Andrew, Runqi Lin, Rouyan Li, Yilin Chen, Xinxin Ji, Jacques Oosthuizen, Moira Sim, Yongsong Chen
{"title":"初级保健医生对2型糖尿病患者治疗负担的反应:中国定性视频分析","authors":"Kai Lin, Mi Yao, Lesley Andrew, Runqi Lin, Rouyan Li, Yilin Chen, Xinxin Ji, Jacques Oosthuizen, Moira Sim, Yongsong Chen","doi":"10.1370/afm.240171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the approaches general practitioners (GPs) use to respond to the treatment burden faced by people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 29 videos of GP-patient consultations in an academic general practice clinic in China. Thematic analysis and a framework matrix approach were used to identify patterns in GPs' responses to the identified issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median length of the 29 video-recorded consultations was 23 minutes 54 seconds. We identified 77 segments focusing on discussions about treatment burden. In 37.7% of these segments, the GP elicited and responded to discussions about treatment burden, whereas in 23.4%, the patient initiated the discussion and the GP responded to it, leaving 39.0% in which the patient initiated the discussion but the GP did not respond. In thematic analysis, medication was the component of treatment burden most frequently identified by both patients and GPs, followed by personal resources, medical information, and administrative burden. General practitioners used 12 response approaches to address patients' treatment burden. The most frequently used included active listening and nonverbal skills, shared decision making, and confidence and self-efficacy support, which were broadly applied across various issues. In contrast, GPs typically reserved health record management, motivational interviewing, and awareness of the patient's background for specific issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In clinical encounters, GPs used a wide variety of approaches to respond to different aspects of the treatment burden of type 2 diabetes. Our findings emphasize the need to improve GPs' response strategies through increased responsiveness and more rapid surfacing of issues during visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"52-59"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Care Physicians' Responses to Treatment Burden in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Video Analysis in China.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Lin, Mi Yao, Lesley Andrew, Runqi Lin, Rouyan Li, Yilin Chen, Xinxin Ji, Jacques Oosthuizen, Moira Sim, Yongsong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.240171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the approaches general practitioners (GPs) use to respond to the treatment burden faced by people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 29 videos of GP-patient consultations in an academic general practice clinic in China. Thematic analysis and a framework matrix approach were used to identify patterns in GPs' responses to the identified issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median length of the 29 video-recorded consultations was 23 minutes 54 seconds. We identified 77 segments focusing on discussions about treatment burden. In 37.7% of these segments, the GP elicited and responded to discussions about treatment burden, whereas in 23.4%, the patient initiated the discussion and the GP responded to it, leaving 39.0% in which the patient initiated the discussion but the GP did not respond. In thematic analysis, medication was the component of treatment burden most frequently identified by both patients and GPs, followed by personal resources, medical information, and administrative burden. General practitioners used 12 response approaches to address patients' treatment burden. The most frequently used included active listening and nonverbal skills, shared decision making, and confidence and self-efficacy support, which were broadly applied across various issues. In contrast, GPs typically reserved health record management, motivational interviewing, and awareness of the patient's background for specific issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In clinical encounters, GPs used a wide variety of approaches to respond to different aspects of the treatment burden of type 2 diabetes. Our findings emphasize the need to improve GPs' response strategies through increased responsiveness and more rapid surfacing of issues during visits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"52-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11772023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240171\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.240171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨全科医生(GPs)如何应对 2 型糖尿病患者所面临的治疗负担:我们回顾性分析了中国一家学术性全科诊所的 29 个全科医生与患者的会诊视频。方法:我们回顾性分析了中国一家学术性全科诊所的 29 个全科医生与患者的会诊视频,并采用主题分析和框架矩阵法来确定全科医生对所发现问题的回应模式:结果:29 个会诊视频的中位长度为 23 分 54 秒。我们确定了 77 个讨论治疗负担的片段。在这些片段中,37.7%的片段由全科医生引出并回应了有关治疗负担的讨论,而在23.4%的片段中,患者主动提出讨论,全科医生作出回应,剩下39.0%的片段中,患者主动提出讨论,全科医生未作出回应。在专题分析中,药物是患者和全科医生最常提到的治疗负担的组成部分,其次是个人资源、医疗信息和行政负担。全科医生使用了 12 种应对方法来解决患者的治疗负担。最常用的方法包括积极倾听和非语言技巧、共同决策、信心和自我效能支持,这些方法广泛应用于各种问题。相比之下,全科医生通常将健康记录管理、动机访谈和对患者背景的了解保留在特定问题上:结论:在临床接触中,全科医生采用了多种方法来应对 2 型糖尿病治疗负担的不同方面。我们的研究结果表明,全科医生有必要通过提高反应能力和在就诊过程中更迅速地发现问题来改进应对策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Care Physicians' Responses to Treatment Burden in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Video Analysis in China.

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the approaches general practitioners (GPs) use to respond to the treatment burden faced by people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 29 videos of GP-patient consultations in an academic general practice clinic in China. Thematic analysis and a framework matrix approach were used to identify patterns in GPs' responses to the identified issues.

Results: The median length of the 29 video-recorded consultations was 23 minutes 54 seconds. We identified 77 segments focusing on discussions about treatment burden. In 37.7% of these segments, the GP elicited and responded to discussions about treatment burden, whereas in 23.4%, the patient initiated the discussion and the GP responded to it, leaving 39.0% in which the patient initiated the discussion but the GP did not respond. In thematic analysis, medication was the component of treatment burden most frequently identified by both patients and GPs, followed by personal resources, medical information, and administrative burden. General practitioners used 12 response approaches to address patients' treatment burden. The most frequently used included active listening and nonverbal skills, shared decision making, and confidence and self-efficacy support, which were broadly applied across various issues. In contrast, GPs typically reserved health record management, motivational interviewing, and awareness of the patient's background for specific issues.

Conclusions: In clinical encounters, GPs used a wide variety of approaches to respond to different aspects of the treatment burden of type 2 diabetes. Our findings emphasize the need to improve GPs' response strategies through increased responsiveness and more rapid surfacing of issues during visits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信