对肥大小关节的现有治疗方法及其局限性的综述-对文献的系统回顾。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Noel Hawkins, Allison García, Fernando López-Candelas, David Salinas Aguirre, Onerys Sierra Trujillo, López Daniela Llerenas King, Lucia Elizabeth Álvarez-Palazuelos, Andrea Virginia Ruiz-Ramírez
{"title":"对肥大小关节的现有治疗方法及其局限性的综述-对文献的系统回顾。","authors":"Noel Hawkins, Allison García, Fernando López-Candelas, David Salinas Aguirre, Onerys Sierra Trujillo, López Daniela Llerenas King, Lucia Elizabeth Álvarez-Palazuelos, Andrea Virginia Ruiz-Ramírez","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians worldwide face the challenging task of improving patient satisfaction by reducing pain in injured patients. Currently, available therapeutic approaches provide only short-term relief of symptoms without addressing long-term satisfaction. This has led to exploring regenerative treatment options that can deliver better outcomes. One such promising option is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, which are gaining popularity as an alternative to standard steroid injections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the therapeutic effects of PRP injections in adult patients with stress or traumatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic literature review yielded 60,301 articles, books, and websites verified and removed from the final project. The final studies used in the report comprised randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports on injecting biologics into the epidural space, facet joints, or sacroiliac joints. In total, 15 reviews and 13 studies were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Wu et al study, 46 participants were randomly divided into group A (0.5 mL PRP injection) and group B (1.5 mL methylprednisolone injection). Although group B initially showed a notable pain reduction at one week, it diminished over 6 months, with group A consistently improving, reaching an 80.96% success rate and higher patient satisfaction. In the study by Singla et al comparing PRP (group P) and corticosteroid (group S) in 40 participants, PRP demonstrated a markedly greater reduction in VAS Scale at 6 weeks and 3 months, with a 90% effectiveness compared with 75% for steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections offer greater pain alleviation, disability reduction, and overall patient satisfaction improvements due to their effect on the immune response to promote the growth and proliferation of damaged tissue. It has also been shown to offer a safer alternative that carries fewer risks than that of transforaminal steroid injections due to promising clinical trials and scientific investigation outcomes. Several of the steroid injection studies proved to have mixed results and efficacy because patients reporting having similar pain relief with placebo groups that used saline injections. Further studies will be needed to evaluate PRP's long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for practical patient use in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of Available Treatments and Their Limitations for Hypertrophic Facet Joints-A Systematic Review of the Literature.\",\"authors\":\"Noel Hawkins, Allison García, Fernando López-Candelas, David Salinas Aguirre, Onerys Sierra Trujillo, López Daniela Llerenas King, Lucia Elizabeth Álvarez-Palazuelos, Andrea Virginia Ruiz-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physicians worldwide face the challenging task of improving patient satisfaction by reducing pain in injured patients. Currently, available therapeutic approaches provide only short-term relief of symptoms without addressing long-term satisfaction. This has led to exploring regenerative treatment options that can deliver better outcomes. One such promising option is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, which are gaining popularity as an alternative to standard steroid injections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examines the therapeutic effects of PRP injections in adult patients with stress or traumatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic literature review yielded 60,301 articles, books, and websites verified and removed from the final project. The final studies used in the report comprised randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports on injecting biologics into the epidural space, facet joints, or sacroiliac joints. In total, 15 reviews and 13 studies were included in this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Wu et al study, 46 participants were randomly divided into group A (0.5 mL PRP injection) and group B (1.5 mL methylprednisolone injection). Although group B initially showed a notable pain reduction at one week, it diminished over 6 months, with group A consistently improving, reaching an 80.96% success rate and higher patient satisfaction. In the study by Singla et al comparing PRP (group P) and corticosteroid (group S) in 40 participants, PRP demonstrated a markedly greater reduction in VAS Scale at 6 weeks and 3 months, with a 90% effectiveness compared with 75% for steroids.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PRP injections offer greater pain alleviation, disability reduction, and overall patient satisfaction improvements due to their effect on the immune response to promote the growth and proliferation of damaged tissue. It has also been shown to offer a safer alternative that carries fewer risks than that of transforaminal steroid injections due to promising clinical trials and scientific investigation outcomes. Several of the steroid injection studies proved to have mixed results and efficacy because patients reporting having similar pain relief with placebo groups that used saline injections. Further studies will be needed to evaluate PRP's long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for practical patient use in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11703435/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界各地的医生都面临着通过减少受伤患者的疼痛来提高患者满意度的挑战性任务。目前,可用的治疗方法只能提供短期的症状缓解,而不能解决长期的满意度。这促使人们探索能够带来更好结果的再生治疗方案。富血小板血浆(PRP)注射是一种很有前景的选择,它作为标准类固醇注射的替代方案越来越受欢迎。目的:探讨PRP注射治疗成人应激性或创伤性损伤的疗效。方法:系统的文献综述得到60,301篇经过验证并从最终项目中删除的文章、书籍和网站。报告中使用的最终研究包括随机试验、观察性研究和将生物制剂注射到硬膜外间隙、小关节或骶髂关节的病例报告。本综述共纳入15篇综述和13项研究。结果:Wu等将46名受试者随机分为A组(注射0.5 mL PRP)和B组(注射1.5 mL甲基强的松龙)。虽然B组最初在一周内疼痛明显减轻,但6个月后疼痛减轻,a组持续改善,成功率达到80.96%,患者满意度更高。在Singla等人对40名参与者进行的PRP (P组)和皮质类固醇(S组)比较研究中,PRP在6周和3个月时显著降低了VAS评分,有效率为90%,而类固醇的有效率为75%。结论:PRP注射能更好地缓解疼痛,减少残疾,提高患者的整体满意度,这是由于其对免疫反应的作用,促进受损组织的生长和增殖。由于有希望的临床试验和科学研究结果,它也被证明是一种比经椎间孔类固醇注射更安全的选择,风险更小。一些类固醇注射研究证明结果和疗效好坏参半,因为患者报告的疼痛缓解与使用生理盐水注射的安慰剂组相似。需要进一步的研究来评估PRP的长期疗效和成本效益,以便将来实际患者使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overview of Available Treatments and Their Limitations for Hypertrophic Facet Joints-A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Background: Physicians worldwide face the challenging task of improving patient satisfaction by reducing pain in injured patients. Currently, available therapeutic approaches provide only short-term relief of symptoms without addressing long-term satisfaction. This has led to exploring regenerative treatment options that can deliver better outcomes. One such promising option is platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections, which are gaining popularity as an alternative to standard steroid injections.

Objectives: This study examines the therapeutic effects of PRP injections in adult patients with stress or traumatic injuries.

Methods: The systematic literature review yielded 60,301 articles, books, and websites verified and removed from the final project. The final studies used in the report comprised randomized trials, observational studies, and case reports on injecting biologics into the epidural space, facet joints, or sacroiliac joints. In total, 15 reviews and 13 studies were included in this review.

Results: In the Wu et al study, 46 participants were randomly divided into group A (0.5 mL PRP injection) and group B (1.5 mL methylprednisolone injection). Although group B initially showed a notable pain reduction at one week, it diminished over 6 months, with group A consistently improving, reaching an 80.96% success rate and higher patient satisfaction. In the study by Singla et al comparing PRP (group P) and corticosteroid (group S) in 40 participants, PRP demonstrated a markedly greater reduction in VAS Scale at 6 weeks and 3 months, with a 90% effectiveness compared with 75% for steroids.

Conclusion: PRP injections offer greater pain alleviation, disability reduction, and overall patient satisfaction improvements due to their effect on the immune response to promote the growth and proliferation of damaged tissue. It has also been shown to offer a safer alternative that carries fewer risks than that of transforaminal steroid injections due to promising clinical trials and scientific investigation outcomes. Several of the steroid injection studies proved to have mixed results and efficacy because patients reporting having similar pain relief with placebo groups that used saline injections. Further studies will be needed to evaluate PRP's long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness for practical patient use in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
282
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信