EMPOWER PKD:多囊肾病研究的患者、护理者和研究者优先事项。

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000695
Reem A Mustafa, Hassan Kawtharany, Mohamad A Kalot, Crystal Y Lumpkins, Kim S Kimminau, Cathy Creed, Kevin Fowler, Ronald D Perrone, Allison Jaure, Yeoungjee Cho, David Baron, Alan S L Yu
{"title":"EMPOWER PKD:多囊肾病研究的患者、护理者和研究者优先事项。","authors":"Reem A Mustafa, Hassan Kawtharany, Mohamad A Kalot, Crystal Y Lumpkins, Kim S Kimminau, Cathy Creed, Kevin Fowler, Ronald D Perrone, Allison Jaure, Yeoungjee Cho, David Baron, Alan S L Yu","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient involvement in research can help to ensure that the evidence generated aligns with their needs and priorities. In the Establishing Meaningful Patient-Centered Outcomes With Relevance for Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease (EMPOWER PKD) project we aimed to identify patient-important outcomes and discuss the impact of PKD on patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine focus groups were held with adult patients with PKD, caregivers, and clinical or research experts in PKD. We used a nominal, multi-vote technique to rank patient-important outcomes to be prioritized by future PKD research. We conducted a thematic analysis of verbatim transcriptions to identify themes regarding the impact of PKD on their daily lives. Other focus group topics included insurability and patient engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients and/or caregivers and eight clinicians and/or researchers participated in the focus groups. Nine focus groups yielded 35 outcomes important to patients which were grouped into six categories, ranked in order of importance: kidney health, comorbidities, lifestyle, psychological impact, family and awareness, and mortality. Regarding the impact of PKD on the patient's daily lives, we identified 5 themes, listed in order of importance: psychological impact, effect on daily living, issues affecting decision-making, healthcare-related issues, and PKD-specific testing dilemmas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of stakeholder engagement in patients with PKD revealed important priorities and values that should be considered for future research and when caring for patients with PKD. Future research should focus on kidney health and managing comorbidities in patients with PKD. This will help to bridge the knowledge gap and develop meaningful comparative effectiveness research (CER) in PKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMPOWER PKD: Patient, Caregiver, and Researcher Priorities for Research in Polycystic Kidney Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Reem A Mustafa, Hassan Kawtharany, Mohamad A Kalot, Crystal Y Lumpkins, Kim S Kimminau, Cathy Creed, Kevin Fowler, Ronald D Perrone, Allison Jaure, Yeoungjee Cho, David Baron, Alan S L Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient involvement in research can help to ensure that the evidence generated aligns with their needs and priorities. In the Establishing Meaningful Patient-Centered Outcomes With Relevance for Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease (EMPOWER PKD) project we aimed to identify patient-important outcomes and discuss the impact of PKD on patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine focus groups were held with adult patients with PKD, caregivers, and clinical or research experts in PKD. We used a nominal, multi-vote technique to rank patient-important outcomes to be prioritized by future PKD research. We conducted a thematic analysis of verbatim transcriptions to identify themes regarding the impact of PKD on their daily lives. Other focus group topics included insurability and patient engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients and/or caregivers and eight clinicians and/or researchers participated in the focus groups. Nine focus groups yielded 35 outcomes important to patients which were grouped into six categories, ranked in order of importance: kidney health, comorbidities, lifestyle, psychological impact, family and awareness, and mortality. Regarding the impact of PKD on the patient's daily lives, we identified 5 themes, listed in order of importance: psychological impact, effect on daily living, issues affecting decision-making, healthcare-related issues, and PKD-specific testing dilemmas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study of stakeholder engagement in patients with PKD revealed important priorities and values that should be considered for future research and when caring for patients with PKD. Future research should focus on kidney health and managing comorbidities in patients with PKD. This will help to bridge the knowledge gap and develop meaningful comparative effectiveness research (CER) in PKD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患者参与研究可以帮助确保产生的证据符合他们的需求和优先事项。在建立与多囊肾病患者相关的有意义的以患者为中心的结局(EMPOWER PKD)项目中,我们旨在确定患者重要的结局,并讨论PKD对患者的影响。方法:对成年PKD患者、护理人员和PKD临床或研究专家进行9个焦点小组的研究。我们使用了一种名义上的多投票技术来对未来PKD研究中优先考虑的患者重要结果进行排序。我们对逐字转录进行了专题分析,以确定有关PKD对他们日常生活影响的主题。其他焦点小组的主题包括保险和患者参与。结果:90名患者和/或护理人员和8名临床医生和/或研究人员参加了焦点小组。9个焦点小组得出35个对患者重要的结果,这些结果按重要性顺序分为6类:肾脏健康、合并症、生活方式、心理影响、家庭和意识以及死亡率。关于PKD对患者日常生活的影响,我们确定了5个主题,按重要性排序:心理影响、对日常生活的影响、影响决策的问题、医疗保健相关问题以及PKD特异性检测困境。结论:这项关于PKD患者利益相关者参与的研究揭示了未来研究和护理PKD患者时应考虑的重要优先事项和价值。未来的研究应侧重于PKD患者的肾脏健康和合并症的管理。这将有助于弥合知识差距,并在PKD中开展有意义的比较有效性研究(CER)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EMPOWER PKD: Patient, Caregiver, and Researcher Priorities for Research in Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Background: Patient involvement in research can help to ensure that the evidence generated aligns with their needs and priorities. In the Establishing Meaningful Patient-Centered Outcomes With Relevance for Patients with Polycystic Kidney Disease (EMPOWER PKD) project we aimed to identify patient-important outcomes and discuss the impact of PKD on patients.

Methods: Nine focus groups were held with adult patients with PKD, caregivers, and clinical or research experts in PKD. We used a nominal, multi-vote technique to rank patient-important outcomes to be prioritized by future PKD research. We conducted a thematic analysis of verbatim transcriptions to identify themes regarding the impact of PKD on their daily lives. Other focus group topics included insurability and patient engagement.

Results: Ninety patients and/or caregivers and eight clinicians and/or researchers participated in the focus groups. Nine focus groups yielded 35 outcomes important to patients which were grouped into six categories, ranked in order of importance: kidney health, comorbidities, lifestyle, psychological impact, family and awareness, and mortality. Regarding the impact of PKD on the patient's daily lives, we identified 5 themes, listed in order of importance: psychological impact, effect on daily living, issues affecting decision-making, healthcare-related issues, and PKD-specific testing dilemmas.

Conclusions: This study of stakeholder engagement in patients with PKD revealed important priorities and values that should be considered for future research and when caring for patients with PKD. Future research should focus on kidney health and managing comorbidities in patients with PKD. This will help to bridge the knowledge gap and develop meaningful comparative effectiveness research (CER) in PKD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信