小儿骨肉瘤活检道切除术:单独切除安全吗?

IF 1.4 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Michael D Eckhoff, Daryn R Strub, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Matthew E Wells, Thomas J Scharschmidt
{"title":"小儿骨肉瘤活检道切除术:单独切除安全吗?","authors":"Michael D Eckhoff, Daryn R Strub, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Matthew E Wells, Thomas J Scharschmidt","doi":"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biopsy is an essential part of proper diagnostic workup in pediatric bone sarcomas impacting surgical planning, chemotherapeutic treatments, and prognostic determination. Two main biopsy techniques are currently used: closed biopsy (core needle or fine needle aspiration) and open biopsy. Historical oncologic teaching is for resection of the biopsy tract with the tumor specimen due to the theoretical risk for biopsy tract tumor contamination; however, this can restrict surgical planning and increase morbidity. This study evaluates oncologic outcomes at this institution, comparing open versus closed biopsy, and biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a single institution of all patients treated for bone sarcomas from 2006 through December 2021. Patient and tumor characteristics, biopsy technique, biopsy resection method, and oncologic outcomes were collected. Subgroup statistical analysis was performed comparing closed biopsy and open biopsy techniques, and biopsy tract resection with the main tumor or separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 48 (65.8%) open biopsies and 25 closed biopsies [23 (31.5%) core needle biopsies and 2 (2.7%) fine needle aspirations]. Biopsy tract resection was performed with the main tumor in 36 (49.3%), separate in 37 (50.7%). There were no statistical differences in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy methodology analysis and biopsy tract removal methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the safety of both approaches for obtaining diagnostic tissues with low rates of biopsy tract seeding in both methods. In addition, it demonstrates that there is no difference in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor. Definitive surgical plan should not vary based on biopsy technique and biopsy tract management, but rather patient, tumor, institutional, and surgeon factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective chart review. The study was started after the patients were diagnosed and treated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16945,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Bone Sarcoma Biopsy Tract Excision: Is it Safe to Resect Separately?\",\"authors\":\"Michael D Eckhoff, Daryn R Strub, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Matthew E Wells, Thomas J Scharschmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPO.0000000000002889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Biopsy is an essential part of proper diagnostic workup in pediatric bone sarcomas impacting surgical planning, chemotherapeutic treatments, and prognostic determination. Two main biopsy techniques are currently used: closed biopsy (core needle or fine needle aspiration) and open biopsy. Historical oncologic teaching is for resection of the biopsy tract with the tumor specimen due to the theoretical risk for biopsy tract tumor contamination; however, this can restrict surgical planning and increase morbidity. This study evaluates oncologic outcomes at this institution, comparing open versus closed biopsy, and biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of a single institution of all patients treated for bone sarcomas from 2006 through December 2021. Patient and tumor characteristics, biopsy technique, biopsy resection method, and oncologic outcomes were collected. Subgroup statistical analysis was performed comparing closed biopsy and open biopsy techniques, and biopsy tract resection with the main tumor or separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 48 (65.8%) open biopsies and 25 closed biopsies [23 (31.5%) core needle biopsies and 2 (2.7%) fine needle aspirations]. Biopsy tract resection was performed with the main tumor in 36 (49.3%), separate in 37 (50.7%). There were no statistical differences in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy methodology analysis and biopsy tract removal methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the safety of both approaches for obtaining diagnostic tissues with low rates of biopsy tract seeding in both methods. In addition, it demonstrates that there is no difference in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor. Definitive surgical plan should not vary based on biopsy technique and biopsy tract management, but rather patient, tumor, institutional, and surgeon factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III-retrospective chart review. The study was started after the patients were diagnosed and treated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002889\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002889","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:活组织检查是儿童骨肉瘤正确诊断的重要组成部分,影响手术计划、化疗治疗和预后决定。目前主要采用两种活检技术:闭式活检(芯针或细针穿刺)和开放式活检。历史肿瘤学教学是由于理论上存在活检道肿瘤污染的风险,对肿瘤标本进行活检道切除;然而,这可能会限制手术计划并增加发病率。本研究评估了该机构的肿瘤预后,比较了开放式和封闭式活检,活检道切除术与主要肿瘤切除术或分开。方法:对2006年至2021年12月接受骨肉瘤治疗的所有患者的单一机构进行回顾性分析。收集患者及肿瘤特征、活检技术、活检切除方法及肿瘤预后。比较闭合活检和开放活检技术,活检道切除与主要肿瘤或单独切除进行亚组统计分析。结果:73例患者符合纳入标准,其中开放式活检48例(65.8%),闭合性活检25例(核心针活检23例(31.5%),细针穿刺2例(2.7%))。主要肿瘤36例(49.3%),单独肿瘤37例(50.7%)行活检道切除术。在局部复发、无病生存、转移进展或总生存方面,活检方法学分析和活检道切除方法没有统计学差异。结论:本研究证明了两种方法获得诊断组织的安全性,两种方法的活检道播种率都很低。此外,该研究还表明,在局部复发、无病生存、转移进展或总生存方面,活检道切除与主要肿瘤切除或与主要肿瘤分离并无差异。最终的手术计划不应根据活检技术和活检道管理而变化,而应根据患者、肿瘤、机构和外科医生的因素而变化。证据等级:iii级——回顾性图表回顾。这项研究是在患者得到诊断和治疗后开始的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Bone Sarcoma Biopsy Tract Excision: Is it Safe to Resect Separately?

Background: Biopsy is an essential part of proper diagnostic workup in pediatric bone sarcomas impacting surgical planning, chemotherapeutic treatments, and prognostic determination. Two main biopsy techniques are currently used: closed biopsy (core needle or fine needle aspiration) and open biopsy. Historical oncologic teaching is for resection of the biopsy tract with the tumor specimen due to the theoretical risk for biopsy tract tumor contamination; however, this can restrict surgical planning and increase morbidity. This study evaluates oncologic outcomes at this institution, comparing open versus closed biopsy, and biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor resection.

Methods: Retrospective review of a single institution of all patients treated for bone sarcomas from 2006 through December 2021. Patient and tumor characteristics, biopsy technique, biopsy resection method, and oncologic outcomes were collected. Subgroup statistical analysis was performed comparing closed biopsy and open biopsy techniques, and biopsy tract resection with the main tumor or separately.

Results: A total of 73 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 48 (65.8%) open biopsies and 25 closed biopsies [23 (31.5%) core needle biopsies and 2 (2.7%) fine needle aspirations]. Biopsy tract resection was performed with the main tumor in 36 (49.3%), separate in 37 (50.7%). There were no statistical differences in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy methodology analysis and biopsy tract removal methods.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the safety of both approaches for obtaining diagnostic tissues with low rates of biopsy tract seeding in both methods. In addition, it demonstrates that there is no difference in local recurrence, disease-free survival, metastatic progression, or overall survival between biopsy tract resection with or separate from the main tumor. Definitive surgical plan should not vary based on biopsy technique and biopsy tract management, but rather patient, tumor, institutional, and surgeon factors.

Level of evidence: Level III-retrospective chart review. The study was started after the patients were diagnosed and treated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
17.60%
发文量
512
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics is a leading journal that focuses specifically on traumatic injuries to give you hands-on on coverage of a fast-growing field. You''ll get articles that cover everything from the nature of injury to the effects of new drug therapies; everything from recommendations for more effective surgical approaches to the latest laboratory findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信