心源性休克和终末期心力衰竭血液动力学监测的先进标志物:一个小型综述。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Konstantinos Sideris, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Lina Brinker, Iosif Taleb, Sotiria Liori, Aliya Hutman-Zahler, Nicholas Hendren, Eric Hall, Stavros G Drakos, Josef Stehlik, James C Fang, Mark H Drazner, Spencer Carter
{"title":"心源性休克和终末期心力衰竭血液动力学监测的先进标志物:一个小型综述。","authors":"Konstantinos Sideris, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Lina Brinker, Iosif Taleb, Sotiria Liori, Aliya Hutman-Zahler, Nicholas Hendren, Eric Hall, Stavros G Drakos, Josef Stehlik, James C Fang, Mark H Drazner, Spencer Carter","doi":"10.1007/s10741-025-10483-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Right heart catheterization (RHC) provides critical hemodynamic insights by measuring atrial, ventricular, and pulmonary artery pressures, as well as cardiac output (CO). Although the use of RHC has decreased, its application has been linked to improved outcomes. Advanced hemodynamic markers such as cardiac power output (CPO), aortic pulsatility index (API), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RAP/PCWP) and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) have been introduced to enhance risk stratification in cardiogenic shock (CS) and end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. CPO has emerged as a potent prognostic tool, with values below 0.6 Watts significantly associated with mortality. Similarly, API and PAPi have demonstrated strong predictive power for adverse outcomes, including death and the need for advanced HF therapies. RAP/PCWP ratio is shown to be a valuable a prognostic tool for RV dysfunction, mortality, and adverse outcomes. Despite mixed evidence on the prognostic utility of RVSWI, its physiologic relevance in assessing right ventricular function remains important. A novel clinical observation, involving patients with an RAP numerically greater than pulmonary artery saturation, was associated with a 71% 30-day mortality rate, underscoring the potential prognostic value of this finding. This review aims to summarize key advanced hemodynamic markers and their role in improving risk stratification and guiding treatment in CS and end-stage HF. The integration of these markers into clinical practice holds the potential to enhance personalized care and improve outcomes for patients with CS and advanced HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12950,"journal":{"name":"Heart Failure Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Markers for Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock and End-Stage Heart Failure: A Mini Review.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Sideris, Christos P Kyriakopoulos, Lina Brinker, Iosif Taleb, Sotiria Liori, Aliya Hutman-Zahler, Nicholas Hendren, Eric Hall, Stavros G Drakos, Josef Stehlik, James C Fang, Mark H Drazner, Spencer Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10741-025-10483-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Right heart catheterization (RHC) provides critical hemodynamic insights by measuring atrial, ventricular, and pulmonary artery pressures, as well as cardiac output (CO). Although the use of RHC has decreased, its application has been linked to improved outcomes. Advanced hemodynamic markers such as cardiac power output (CPO), aortic pulsatility index (API), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RAP/PCWP) and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) have been introduced to enhance risk stratification in cardiogenic shock (CS) and end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. CPO has emerged as a potent prognostic tool, with values below 0.6 Watts significantly associated with mortality. Similarly, API and PAPi have demonstrated strong predictive power for adverse outcomes, including death and the need for advanced HF therapies. RAP/PCWP ratio is shown to be a valuable a prognostic tool for RV dysfunction, mortality, and adverse outcomes. Despite mixed evidence on the prognostic utility of RVSWI, its physiologic relevance in assessing right ventricular function remains important. A novel clinical observation, involving patients with an RAP numerically greater than pulmonary artery saturation, was associated with a 71% 30-day mortality rate, underscoring the potential prognostic value of this finding. This review aims to summarize key advanced hemodynamic markers and their role in improving risk stratification and guiding treatment in CS and end-stage HF. The integration of these markers into clinical practice holds the potential to enhance personalized care and improve outcomes for patients with CS and advanced HF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart Failure Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10483-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Failure Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-025-10483-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

右心导管(RHC)通过测量心房、心室和肺动脉压力以及心输出量(CO)提供关键的血流动力学信息。虽然RHC的使用减少了,但其应用与改善的预后有关。先进的血流动力学指标,如心功率输出量(CPO)、主动脉脉搏指数(API)、肺动脉脉搏指数(PAPi)、右心房压与肺毛细血管楔压比(RAP/PCWP)和右心室卒中工作指数(RVSWI)已被引入,以加强心源性休克(CS)和终末期心力衰竭(HF)患者的风险分层。CPO已成为一种有效的预后工具,其值低于0.6瓦特与死亡率显著相关。同样,API和PAPi对不良结局(包括死亡和对高级心衰治疗的需求)具有很强的预测能力。RAP/PCWP比值被证明是判断右心室功能障碍、死亡率和不良后果的一个有价值的预后工具。尽管RVSWI的预后应用证据不一,但其在评估右心室功能方面的生理学相关性仍然很重要。一项新的临床观察,涉及RAP数值大于肺动脉饱和度的患者,与71%的30天死亡率相关,强调了这一发现的潜在预后价值。本文旨在总结关键的先进血流动力学指标及其在改善CS和终末期HF的风险分层和指导治疗中的作用。将这些标志物整合到临床实践中,有可能增强CS和晚期心衰患者的个性化护理和改善预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Markers for Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock and End-Stage Heart Failure: A Mini Review.

Right heart catheterization (RHC) provides critical hemodynamic insights by measuring atrial, ventricular, and pulmonary artery pressures, as well as cardiac output (CO). Although the use of RHC has decreased, its application has been linked to improved outcomes. Advanced hemodynamic markers such as cardiac power output (CPO), aortic pulsatility index (API), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), right atrial pressure to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio (RAP/PCWP) and right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) have been introduced to enhance risk stratification in cardiogenic shock (CS) and end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. CPO has emerged as a potent prognostic tool, with values below 0.6 Watts significantly associated with mortality. Similarly, API and PAPi have demonstrated strong predictive power for adverse outcomes, including death and the need for advanced HF therapies. RAP/PCWP ratio is shown to be a valuable a prognostic tool for RV dysfunction, mortality, and adverse outcomes. Despite mixed evidence on the prognostic utility of RVSWI, its physiologic relevance in assessing right ventricular function remains important. A novel clinical observation, involving patients with an RAP numerically greater than pulmonary artery saturation, was associated with a 71% 30-day mortality rate, underscoring the potential prognostic value of this finding. This review aims to summarize key advanced hemodynamic markers and their role in improving risk stratification and guiding treatment in CS and end-stage HF. The integration of these markers into clinical practice holds the potential to enhance personalized care and improve outcomes for patients with CS and advanced HF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart Failure Reviews
Heart Failure Reviews 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart Failure Reviews is an international journal which develops links between basic scientists and clinical investigators, creating a unique, interdisciplinary dialogue focused on heart failure, its pathogenesis and treatment. The journal accordingly publishes papers in both basic and clinical research fields. Topics covered include clinical and surgical approaches to therapy, basic pharmacology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pathology, and electrophysiology. The reviews are comprehensive, expanding the reader''s knowledge base and awareness of current research and new findings in this rapidly growing field of cardiovascular medicine. All reviews are thoroughly peer-reviewed before publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信