Gabby Atlas, Chloe Hanna, Tiong Yang Tan, Elena Tucker, Katie Ayers, Andrew Sinclair, Michele A O'Connell
{"title":"性别发展差异儿童和青少年的护理挑战。","authors":"Gabby Atlas, Chloe Hanna, Tiong Yang Tan, Elena Tucker, Katie Ayers, Andrew Sinclair, Michele A O'Connell","doi":"10.1111/cen.15180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ideal model of care for individuals with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) continues to evolve, with multiple models proposed. This study aimed to explore current care models for individuals with DSD in Australia and New Zealand (NZ) and to identify clinician perceptions of gaps and barriers in current practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire, conducted via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with DSD in Australia and NZ were contacted through multimodal recruitment approaches. Themes included demographics of respondents, preferred terminology, composition of the DSD multidisciplinary team (MDT) and availability of a database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine eligible participants from centers in all states and territories of Australia and NZ commenced the survey with 63 complete responses. Almost One-third (31%) of participants are not currently part of a DSD MDT meeting at their center. While three quarters (76%) of respondents identified changes to DSD care over the past 5 years, three quarters (75%) also identified barriers to current care provision. Only 20% of respondents reported psychology being a current part of their MDT and 70% identified psychology as a desired but missing part of their team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Responses to the survey identify gaps and barriers to DSD care across Australia and NZ, particularly a lack of psychosocial supports. Current models fall short of international recommendations and services need to explore the reasons for these gaps further.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in Care Provision for Children and Adolescents With Differences of Sex Development.\",\"authors\":\"Gabby Atlas, Chloe Hanna, Tiong Yang Tan, Elena Tucker, Katie Ayers, Andrew Sinclair, Michele A O'Connell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cen.15180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ideal model of care for individuals with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) continues to evolve, with multiple models proposed. This study aimed to explore current care models for individuals with DSD in Australia and New Zealand (NZ) and to identify clinician perceptions of gaps and barriers in current practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire, conducted via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with DSD in Australia and NZ were contacted through multimodal recruitment approaches. Themes included demographics of respondents, preferred terminology, composition of the DSD multidisciplinary team (MDT) and availability of a database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine eligible participants from centers in all states and territories of Australia and NZ commenced the survey with 63 complete responses. Almost One-third (31%) of participants are not currently part of a DSD MDT meeting at their center. While three quarters (76%) of respondents identified changes to DSD care over the past 5 years, three quarters (75%) also identified barriers to current care provision. Only 20% of respondents reported psychology being a current part of their MDT and 70% identified psychology as a desired but missing part of their team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Responses to the survey identify gaps and barriers to DSD care across Australia and NZ, particularly a lack of psychosocial supports. Current models fall short of international recommendations and services need to explore the reasons for these gaps further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15180\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenges in Care Provision for Children and Adolescents With Differences of Sex Development.
Objectives: The ideal model of care for individuals with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) continues to evolve, with multiple models proposed. This study aimed to explore current care models for individuals with DSD in Australia and New Zealand (NZ) and to identify clinician perceptions of gaps and barriers in current practice.
Methods: Cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire, conducted via Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) software. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and management of individuals with DSD in Australia and NZ were contacted through multimodal recruitment approaches. Themes included demographics of respondents, preferred terminology, composition of the DSD multidisciplinary team (MDT) and availability of a database.
Results: Seventy-nine eligible participants from centers in all states and territories of Australia and NZ commenced the survey with 63 complete responses. Almost One-third (31%) of participants are not currently part of a DSD MDT meeting at their center. While three quarters (76%) of respondents identified changes to DSD care over the past 5 years, three quarters (75%) also identified barriers to current care provision. Only 20% of respondents reported psychology being a current part of their MDT and 70% identified psychology as a desired but missing part of their team.
Conclusions: Responses to the survey identify gaps and barriers to DSD care across Australia and NZ, particularly a lack of psychosocial supports. Current models fall short of international recommendations and services need to explore the reasons for these gaps further.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.