一项为期 28 周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验 (OA-10),旨在评估在中度至重度症状性骨关节炎患者的目标膝关节中单次注射 lorecivivint 的疗效和安全性。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Yusuf Yazici, Jeyanesh R S Tambiah, Christopher J Swearingen, Victor A Lopez, Sarah Kennedy, Mark S Fineman, Ismail Simsek, Emily Solomon, Timothy E Mcalindon
{"title":"一项为期 28 周的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 3 期试验 (OA-10),旨在评估在中度至重度症状性骨关节炎患者的目标膝关节中单次注射 lorecivivint 的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Yusuf Yazici, Jeyanesh R S Tambiah, Christopher J Swearingen, Victor A Lopez, Sarah Kennedy, Mark S Fineman, Ismail Simsek, Emily Solomon, Timothy E Mcalindon","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gskbin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an intra-articular (IA) CLK/DYRK inhibitor, lorecivivint (LOR), for the treatment of moderate to severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single IA injection of LOR. Patients with ACR-defined knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 2-3, and pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4 and ≤8 in the target knee were randomised (1:1) to receive LOR 0.07 mg or vehicle placebo (PBO) on Day 1. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Pain NRS at Week 12 between LOR and PBO. Additional outcomes included the change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function, WOMAC Pain, Patient Global Assessment and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>498 patients were randomised, and 51.9% had KL Grade 3 severity. In the full analysis set (FAS), LOR failed to meet the primary endpoint when compared to PBO. No significant treatment differences were noted in other efficacy endpoints. A post-hoc analysis demonstrated a positive treatment effect of LOR relative to PBO in the KL Grade 2 subgroup; the difference in weekly Pain NRS between LOR and PBO groups showed nominal statistical significance at Week 4 (p<0.05). Incidences, seriousness, and severity of adverse events were similar across the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOR was well tolerated despite not meeting the primary endpoint. Efficacy signals were identified in patients with less severe structural knee OA disease, suggesting earlier intervention may be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OA-10) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single injection of lorecivivint in the target knee joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Yazici, Jeyanesh R S Tambiah, Christopher J Swearingen, Victor A Lopez, Sarah Kennedy, Mark S Fineman, Ismail Simsek, Emily Solomon, Timothy E Mcalindon\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gskbin\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of an intra-articular (IA) CLK/DYRK inhibitor, lorecivivint (LOR), for the treatment of moderate to severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single IA injection of LOR. Patients with ACR-defined knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 2-3, and pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4 and ≤8 in the target knee were randomised (1:1) to receive LOR 0.07 mg or vehicle placebo (PBO) on Day 1. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Pain NRS at Week 12 between LOR and PBO. Additional outcomes included the change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function, WOMAC Pain, Patient Global Assessment and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>498 patients were randomised, and 51.9% had KL Grade 3 severity. In the full analysis set (FAS), LOR failed to meet the primary endpoint when compared to PBO. No significant treatment differences were noted in other efficacy endpoints. A post-hoc analysis demonstrated a positive treatment effect of LOR relative to PBO in the KL Grade 2 subgroup; the difference in weekly Pain NRS between LOR and PBO groups showed nominal statistical significance at Week 4 (p<0.05). Incidences, seriousness, and severity of adverse events were similar across the treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LOR was well tolerated despite not meeting the primary endpoint. Efficacy signals were identified in patients with less severe structural knee OA disease, suggesting earlier intervention may be more effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gskbin\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gskbin","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估关节内(IA) CLK/DYRK抑制剂lorecvivint (LOR)治疗中重度症状性膝骨关节炎(OA)的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项为期28周,多中心,双盲,安慰剂对照的3期研究,评估单次IA注射LOR的有效性和安全性。acr定义的膝关节OA, kellgreen - lawrence (KL)分级为2-3,目标膝关节疼痛数值评定量表(NRS)≥4和≤8的患者被随机分配(1:1),在第1天接受0.07 mg LOR或对照安慰剂(PBO)。主要终点是第12周LOR和PBO之间疼痛NRS的基线变化。其他结果包括西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)功能、WOMAC疼痛、患者总体评估和安全性的基线变化。结果:498例患者被随机分组,51.9%的患者有KL 3级严重程度。在完整分析集(FAS)中,与PBO相比,LOR未能达到主要终点。在其他疗效终点上没有发现显著的治疗差异。事后分析表明,在KL 2级亚组中,LOR相对于PBO具有积极的治疗效果;在第4周时,LOR组和PBO组之间的周疼痛NRS差异具有统计学意义(结论:尽管未达到主要终点,但LOR耐受性良好。在不太严重的结构性膝关节炎患者中发现了疗效信号,表明早期干预可能更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OA-10) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single injection of lorecivivint in the target knee joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis patients.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of an intra-articular (IA) CLK/DYRK inhibitor, lorecivivint (LOR), for the treatment of moderate to severe symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: This was a Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of a single IA injection of LOR. Patients with ACR-defined knee OA, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grades 2-3, and pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4 and ≤8 in the target knee were randomised (1:1) to receive LOR 0.07 mg or vehicle placebo (PBO) on Day 1. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Pain NRS at Week 12 between LOR and PBO. Additional outcomes included the change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Function, WOMAC Pain, Patient Global Assessment and safety.

Results: 498 patients were randomised, and 51.9% had KL Grade 3 severity. In the full analysis set (FAS), LOR failed to meet the primary endpoint when compared to PBO. No significant treatment differences were noted in other efficacy endpoints. A post-hoc analysis demonstrated a positive treatment effect of LOR relative to PBO in the KL Grade 2 subgroup; the difference in weekly Pain NRS between LOR and PBO groups showed nominal statistical significance at Week 4 (p<0.05). Incidences, seriousness, and severity of adverse events were similar across the treatment groups.

Conclusions: LOR was well tolerated despite not meeting the primary endpoint. Efficacy signals were identified in patients with less severe structural knee OA disease, suggesting earlier intervention may be more effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信