18F-FDG PET/CT两病变放射组学和传统模型对经典霍奇金淋巴瘤的预测能力:一项回顾性验证的比较研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari, David Morland, Roberto Gatta, Luca Boldrini, Marco De Summa, Silvia Chiesa, Annarosa Cuccaro, Elena Maiolo, Stefan Hohaus, Salvatore Annunziata
{"title":"18F-FDG PET/CT两病变放射组学和传统模型对经典霍奇金淋巴瘤的预测能力:一项回顾性验证的比较研究。","authors":"Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari, David Morland, Roberto Gatta, Luca Boldrini, Marco De Summa, Silvia Chiesa, Annarosa Cuccaro, Elena Maiolo, Stefan Hohaus, Salvatore Annunziata","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06190-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a previous preliminary study, radiomic features from the largest and the hottest lesion in baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (bPET/CT) of classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) predicted early response-to-treatment and prognosis. Aim of this large retrospectively-validated study is to evaluate the predictive role of two-lesions radiomics in comparison with other clinical and conventional PET/CT models. cHL patients with bPET/CT between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included and randomized into training-validation sets. Target lesions were: Lesion_A, with largest axial diameter (D<sub>max</sub>); Lesion_B, with highest SUV<sub>max</sub>. Total-metabolic-tumor-volume (TMTV) was calculated and 212 radiomic features were extracted. PET/CT features were harmonized using ComBat across two scanners. Outcomes were progression-free-survival (PFS) and Deauville Score at interim PET/CT (DS). For each outcome, three predictive models and their combinations were trained and validated: - radiomic model \"R\"; - conventional PET/CT model \"P\"; - clinical model \"C\". 197 patients were included (training = 118; validation = 79): 38/197 (19%) patients had adverse events and 42/193 (22%) had DS ≥ 4. In the training phase, only one radiomic feature was selected for PFS prediction in model \"R\" (Lesion_B F_cm.corr, C-index 66.9%). Best \"C\" model combined stage and IPS (C-index 74.8%), while optimal \"P\" model combined TMTV and D<sub>max</sub> (C-index 63.3%). After internal validation, \"C\", \"C + R\", \"R + P\" and \"C + R + P\" significantly predicted PFS. The best validated model was \"C + R\" (C-index 66.3%). No model was validated for DS prediction. In this large retrospectively-validated study, a combination of baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and other conventional models showed an added prognostic power in patients with cHL. As single models, conventional clinical parameters maintain their prognostic power, while radiomics or conventional PET/CT alone seem to be sub-optimal to predict survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive power of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and conventional models in classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a comparative retrospectively-validated study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari, David Morland, Roberto Gatta, Luca Boldrini, Marco De Summa, Silvia Chiesa, Annarosa Cuccaro, Elena Maiolo, Stefan Hohaus, Salvatore Annunziata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06190-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In a previous preliminary study, radiomic features from the largest and the hottest lesion in baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (bPET/CT) of classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) predicted early response-to-treatment and prognosis. Aim of this large retrospectively-validated study is to evaluate the predictive role of two-lesions radiomics in comparison with other clinical and conventional PET/CT models. cHL patients with bPET/CT between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included and randomized into training-validation sets. Target lesions were: Lesion_A, with largest axial diameter (D<sub>max</sub>); Lesion_B, with highest SUV<sub>max</sub>. Total-metabolic-tumor-volume (TMTV) was calculated and 212 radiomic features were extracted. PET/CT features were harmonized using ComBat across two scanners. Outcomes were progression-free-survival (PFS) and Deauville Score at interim PET/CT (DS). For each outcome, three predictive models and their combinations were trained and validated: - radiomic model \\\"R\\\"; - conventional PET/CT model \\\"P\\\"; - clinical model \\\"C\\\". 197 patients were included (training = 118; validation = 79): 38/197 (19%) patients had adverse events and 42/193 (22%) had DS ≥ 4. In the training phase, only one radiomic feature was selected for PFS prediction in model \\\"R\\\" (Lesion_B F_cm.corr, C-index 66.9%). Best \\\"C\\\" model combined stage and IPS (C-index 74.8%), while optimal \\\"P\\\" model combined TMTV and D<sub>max</sub> (C-index 63.3%). After internal validation, \\\"C\\\", \\\"C + R\\\", \\\"R + P\\\" and \\\"C + R + P\\\" significantly predicted PFS. The best validated model was \\\"C + R\\\" (C-index 66.3%). No model was validated for DS prediction. In this large retrospectively-validated study, a combination of baseline <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and other conventional models showed an added prognostic power in patients with cHL. As single models, conventional clinical parameters maintain their prognostic power, while radiomics or conventional PET/CT alone seem to be sub-optimal to predict survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06190-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06190-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在之前的一项初步研究中,经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)基线18F-FDG PET/CT (bPET/CT)最大和最热病灶的放射学特征预测了早期治疗反应和预后。这项大型回顾性验证研究的目的是评估两病变放射组学与其他临床和传统PET/CT模型的预测作用。回顾性纳入2010年至2020年间接受bPET/CT检查的cHL患者,并随机分为训练验证组。目标病变为:Lesion_A,轴向直径最大(Dmax);Lesion_B, SUVmax最高。计算总代谢-肿瘤体积(TMTV),提取212个放射学特征。PET/CT特征在两个扫描仪上使用ComBat进行协调。结果为无进展生存期(PFS)和中期PET/CT的多维尔评分(DS)。针对每种结果,对三种预测模型及其组合进行训练和验证:放射学模型“R”;-常规PET/CT模型“P”;-临床“C”型。纳入197例患者(培训= 118;验证= 79):38/197(19%)例患者出现不良事件,42/193(22%)例患者DS≥4。在训练阶段,只选择一个放射学特征用于模型“R”的PFS预测(Lesion_B F_cm)。C-index为66.9%)。最佳的“C”模型结合了阶段和IPS (C指数为74.8%),而最优的“P”模型结合了TMTV和Dmax (C指数为63.3%)。经内部验证,“C”、“C + R”、“R + P”和“C + R + P”显著预测PFS。验证的最佳模型为“C + R”(C指数66.3%)。没有模型被验证为DS预测。在这项回顾性验证的大型研究中,基线18F-FDG PET/CT两病变放射组学和其他常规模型的结合显示了cHL患者的预后能力。作为单一模型,常规临床参数保持其预后能力,而放射组学或常规PET/CT单独预测生存似乎不是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The predictive power of 18F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and conventional models in classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: a comparative retrospectively-validated study.

In a previous preliminary study, radiomic features from the largest and the hottest lesion in baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT (bPET/CT) of classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma (cHL) predicted early response-to-treatment and prognosis. Aim of this large retrospectively-validated study is to evaluate the predictive role of two-lesions radiomics in comparison with other clinical and conventional PET/CT models. cHL patients with bPET/CT between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included and randomized into training-validation sets. Target lesions were: Lesion_A, with largest axial diameter (Dmax); Lesion_B, with highest SUVmax. Total-metabolic-tumor-volume (TMTV) was calculated and 212 radiomic features were extracted. PET/CT features were harmonized using ComBat across two scanners. Outcomes were progression-free-survival (PFS) and Deauville Score at interim PET/CT (DS). For each outcome, three predictive models and their combinations were trained and validated: - radiomic model "R"; - conventional PET/CT model "P"; - clinical model "C". 197 patients were included (training = 118; validation = 79): 38/197 (19%) patients had adverse events and 42/193 (22%) had DS ≥ 4. In the training phase, only one radiomic feature was selected for PFS prediction in model "R" (Lesion_B F_cm.corr, C-index 66.9%). Best "C" model combined stage and IPS (C-index 74.8%), while optimal "P" model combined TMTV and Dmax (C-index 63.3%). After internal validation, "C", "C + R", "R + P" and "C + R + P" significantly predicted PFS. The best validated model was "C + R" (C-index 66.3%). No model was validated for DS prediction. In this large retrospectively-validated study, a combination of baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT two-lesions radiomics and other conventional models showed an added prognostic power in patients with cHL. As single models, conventional clinical parameters maintain their prognostic power, while radiomics or conventional PET/CT alone seem to be sub-optimal to predict survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信