更正“semaglutide 2.4 mg对超重或肥胖成人身体功能、体重和健康相关生活质量的影响:step1 -4试验中患者报告的结果”。

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
{"title":"更正“semaglutide 2.4 mg对超重或肥胖成人身体功能、体重和健康相关生活质量的影响:step1 -4试验中患者报告的结果”。","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/dom.16205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n <span>Rubino, D</span>, <span>Bjorner, JB</span>, <span>Rathor, N</span>, <span>Sharma, AM</span>, <span>Huth, Smith L</span>, <span>Wharton, S</span>, <span>Wadden, T</span>, <span>Zeuthen, N</span>, <span>Kolotkin, RL</span>. <span>Diabetes</span>, <i>Obesity and Metabolism</i> <span>2024</span>; <span>26</span>(<span>7</span>): <span>2945</span>–<span>2955</span>. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15620\n </p><p>In the abstract, the p-value for the difference in achievement of the MWPC threshold for SF-36v2 Physical Functioning was reported as <i>p</i> = 0.00001; the correct value is <i>p</i> = 0.0005 (as shown in Figure 2).</p><p>In Table 1, the SD of the age of participants in STEP 4 was reported as 11.9; the correct value is 11.7. The waist circumference of participants in STEP 1 was reported as 114 cm; the correct value is 114.7 cm. The number and proportion of participants in STEP 1 with prediabetes were reported as 855 and 43.6%; the correct values are 856 and 43.7%.</p><p>In section 3.2.2, the proportion of participants receiving placebo in STEP 1 who reached the ≥4.5 point MWPC threshold was reported as 13.0%; the correct value is 12.9%. The ETD for STEP 4 was reported as 5.0; the correct value is 4.9.</p><p>In section 3.2.3, the Figure S6 p-values were summarized as <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; the correct summary is <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p><p>In Figure 1B, some error bars did not align with the 95% CIs shown in the column on the right. In Figure 1A and 1B, there were some minor rounding errors in a small number of the data points in the columns.</p><p>In Figure 2B, the upper 95% CIs for the STEP 1 and STEP 2 SF-36v2 ETDs were reported as 20.9 and 21.3; the correct values are 20.8 and 21.2.</p><p>In Table S4, the ETD for proportion of participants achieving MWPC for Psychosocial score for STEP 2 was reported as 5.4; the correct value is 5.3. The upper 95% CI for Physical score for STEP 2 was reported as 11.2; the correct value is 11.3.</p><p>In Figure S6B, the number participants in STEP 2 with &lt;5% weight loss was reported as 582; the correct value is 542.</p><p>In Figure S7B, the upper 95% CI for the STEP 1 full trial population ETD was reported as 20.9; the correct value is 20.8. The proportion of participants in STEP 2 with poor PF at baseline in the semaglutide group achieving MWPC was reported as 53.6%; the correct value is 53.5%. The proportions of participants in the full trial population achieving this threshold were reported as 18.0% for the semaglutide group and 6.6% for the placebo group; the correct values are 41.0% and 27.3%. The upper 95% CI for the corresponding ETD was reported as 21.3; the correct value is 21.2. The p-value for this ETD was reported as <i>p</i> = 0.0061; the correct value is <i>p</i> = 0.0005.</p><p>In Figure S9B, the baseline value for ‘Unable to stand comfortably’ was reported as 2.11; the correct value is 2.06. The baseline value for ‘Unable to walk far/quickly’ was reported as 2.57; the correct value is 2.37.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p><p>The online version of the article has been corrected, and the supporting information file has been corrected and resupplied.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 3","pages":"1631"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dom.16205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correction to “Effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on physical functioning and weight- and health-related quality of life in adults with overweight or obesity: Patient-reported outcomes from the STEP 1–4 trials”\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>\\n <span>Rubino, D</span>, <span>Bjorner, JB</span>, <span>Rathor, N</span>, <span>Sharma, AM</span>, <span>Huth, Smith L</span>, <span>Wharton, S</span>, <span>Wadden, T</span>, <span>Zeuthen, N</span>, <span>Kolotkin, RL</span>. <span>Diabetes</span>, <i>Obesity and Metabolism</i> <span>2024</span>; <span>26</span>(<span>7</span>): <span>2945</span>–<span>2955</span>. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15620\\n </p><p>In the abstract, the p-value for the difference in achievement of the MWPC threshold for SF-36v2 Physical Functioning was reported as <i>p</i> = 0.00001; the correct value is <i>p</i> = 0.0005 (as shown in Figure 2).</p><p>In Table 1, the SD of the age of participants in STEP 4 was reported as 11.9; the correct value is 11.7. The waist circumference of participants in STEP 1 was reported as 114 cm; the correct value is 114.7 cm. The number and proportion of participants in STEP 1 with prediabetes were reported as 855 and 43.6%; the correct values are 856 and 43.7%.</p><p>In section 3.2.2, the proportion of participants receiving placebo in STEP 1 who reached the ≥4.5 point MWPC threshold was reported as 13.0%; the correct value is 12.9%. The ETD for STEP 4 was reported as 5.0; the correct value is 4.9.</p><p>In section 3.2.3, the Figure S6 p-values were summarized as <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; the correct summary is <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01.</p><p>In Figure 1B, some error bars did not align with the 95% CIs shown in the column on the right. In Figure 1A and 1B, there were some minor rounding errors in a small number of the data points in the columns.</p><p>In Figure 2B, the upper 95% CIs for the STEP 1 and STEP 2 SF-36v2 ETDs were reported as 20.9 and 21.3; the correct values are 20.8 and 21.2.</p><p>In Table S4, the ETD for proportion of participants achieving MWPC for Psychosocial score for STEP 2 was reported as 5.4; the correct value is 5.3. The upper 95% CI for Physical score for STEP 2 was reported as 11.2; the correct value is 11.3.</p><p>In Figure S6B, the number participants in STEP 2 with &lt;5% weight loss was reported as 582; the correct value is 542.</p><p>In Figure S7B, the upper 95% CI for the STEP 1 full trial population ETD was reported as 20.9; the correct value is 20.8. The proportion of participants in STEP 2 with poor PF at baseline in the semaglutide group achieving MWPC was reported as 53.6%; the correct value is 53.5%. The proportions of participants in the full trial population achieving this threshold were reported as 18.0% for the semaglutide group and 6.6% for the placebo group; the correct values are 41.0% and 27.3%. The upper 95% CI for the corresponding ETD was reported as 21.3; the correct value is 21.2. The p-value for this ETD was reported as <i>p</i> = 0.0061; the correct value is <i>p</i> = 0.0005.</p><p>In Figure S9B, the baseline value for ‘Unable to stand comfortably’ was reported as 2.11; the correct value is 2.06. The baseline value for ‘Unable to walk far/quickly’ was reported as 2.57; the correct value is 2.37.</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p><p>The online version of the article has been corrected, and the supporting information file has been corrected and resupplied.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"1631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dom.16205\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16205\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16205","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Rubino, D, Bjorner, JB, Rathor, N, Sharma, AM, Huth, Smith L, Wharton, S, Wadden, T, Zeuthen, N, Kolotkin, RL。糖尿病、肥胖和代谢2024;26(7): 2945 - 2955。DOI: 10.1111 / dom.15620摘要,SF-36v2生理功能MWPC阈值实现差异的p值报告为p = 0.00001;正确值为p = 0.0005(如图2所示)。在表1中,STEP 4参与者的年龄SD报告为11.9;正确的值是11.7。STEP 1中参与者的腰围报告为114厘米;正确的数值是114.7厘米。STEP 1中糖尿病前期患者的人数和比例分别为855人和43.6%;正确的值是856和43.7%。在第3.2.2节中,step1中接受安慰剂的受试者达到≥4.5点MWPC阈值的比例报道为13.0%;正确的值是12.9%。step4的ETD报告为5.0;正确的值是4.9。在第3.2.3节中,图S6的p值总结为p <; 0.001;正确的总结是p <; 0.01。在图1B中,一些误差条与右列中显示的95% ci不一致。在图1A和1B中,列中的少数数据点存在一些小的舍入误差。在图2B中,step1和step2 SF-36v2 ETDs的95% ci值分别为20.9和21.3;正确的值是20.8和21.2。在表S4中,step2社会心理评分达到MWPC的参与者比例的ETD报告为5.4;正确的值是5.3。step2 Physical score的95% CI上限为11.2;正确的值是11.3。在图S6B中,STEP 2中体重减轻5%的参与者报告为582人;正确的值是542。在图S7B中,STEP 1全试验人群ETD的95% CI上限为20.9;正确的值是20.8。在第2步中,基线时PF较差的西马鲁肽组达到MWPC的比例为53.6%;正确的值是53.5%。据报道,在整个试验人群中,达到该阈值的参与者比例在西马鲁肽组为18.0%,在安慰剂组为6.6%;正确值分别为41.0%和27.3%。相应ETD的95% CI上限为21.3;正确的值是21.2。该ETD的p值报告为p = 0.0061;正确的值是p = 0.0005。在图S9B中,“无法舒适站立”的基线值报告为2.11;正确的值是2.06。“不能走远/走快”的基线值为2.57;正确的值是2.37。我们为这些错误道歉。文章的网络版已更正,支持信息文件已更正并重新提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correction to “Effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on physical functioning and weight- and health-related quality of life in adults with overweight or obesity: Patient-reported outcomes from the STEP 1–4 trials”

Rubino, D, Bjorner, JB, Rathor, N, Sharma, AM, Huth, Smith L, Wharton, S, Wadden, T, Zeuthen, N, Kolotkin, RL. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2024; 26(7): 29452955. DOI: 10.1111/dom.15620

In the abstract, the p-value for the difference in achievement of the MWPC threshold for SF-36v2 Physical Functioning was reported as p = 0.00001; the correct value is p = 0.0005 (as shown in Figure 2).

In Table 1, the SD of the age of participants in STEP 4 was reported as 11.9; the correct value is 11.7. The waist circumference of participants in STEP 1 was reported as 114 cm; the correct value is 114.7 cm. The number and proportion of participants in STEP 1 with prediabetes were reported as 855 and 43.6%; the correct values are 856 and 43.7%.

In section 3.2.2, the proportion of participants receiving placebo in STEP 1 who reached the ≥4.5 point MWPC threshold was reported as 13.0%; the correct value is 12.9%. The ETD for STEP 4 was reported as 5.0; the correct value is 4.9.

In section 3.2.3, the Figure S6 p-values were summarized as p < 0.001; the correct summary is p < 0.01.

In Figure 1B, some error bars did not align with the 95% CIs shown in the column on the right. In Figure 1A and 1B, there were some minor rounding errors in a small number of the data points in the columns.

In Figure 2B, the upper 95% CIs for the STEP 1 and STEP 2 SF-36v2 ETDs were reported as 20.9 and 21.3; the correct values are 20.8 and 21.2.

In Table S4, the ETD for proportion of participants achieving MWPC for Psychosocial score for STEP 2 was reported as 5.4; the correct value is 5.3. The upper 95% CI for Physical score for STEP 2 was reported as 11.2; the correct value is 11.3.

In Figure S6B, the number participants in STEP 2 with <5% weight loss was reported as 582; the correct value is 542.

In Figure S7B, the upper 95% CI for the STEP 1 full trial population ETD was reported as 20.9; the correct value is 20.8. The proportion of participants in STEP 2 with poor PF at baseline in the semaglutide group achieving MWPC was reported as 53.6%; the correct value is 53.5%. The proportions of participants in the full trial population achieving this threshold were reported as 18.0% for the semaglutide group and 6.6% for the placebo group; the correct values are 41.0% and 27.3%. The upper 95% CI for the corresponding ETD was reported as 21.3; the correct value is 21.2. The p-value for this ETD was reported as p = 0.0061; the correct value is p = 0.0005.

In Figure S9B, the baseline value for ‘Unable to stand comfortably’ was reported as 2.11; the correct value is 2.06. The baseline value for ‘Unable to walk far/quickly’ was reported as 2.57; the correct value is 2.37.

We apologize for these errors.

The online version of the article has been corrected, and the supporting information file has been corrected and resupplied.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信