无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者通气气量、压力和通气率与通气机械功率的关系:探讨通气率降低的影响

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1111/anae.16537
Laura A. Buiteman-Kruizinga, David M. P. van Meenen, Ary Serpa Neto, Guido Mazzinari, Lieuwe D. J. Bos, Pim L. J. van der Heiden, Frederique Paulus, Marcus J. Schultz, for the NEBULAE, PReVENT, RELAx, investigators
{"title":"无急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者通气气量、压力和通气率与通气机械功率的关系:探讨通气率降低的影响","authors":"Laura A. Buiteman-Kruizinga,&nbsp;David M. P. van Meenen,&nbsp;Ary Serpa Neto,&nbsp;Guido Mazzinari,&nbsp;Lieuwe D. J. Bos,&nbsp;Pim L. J. van der Heiden,&nbsp;Frederique Paulus,&nbsp;Marcus J. Schultz,&nbsp;for the NEBULAE,&nbsp;PReVENT,&nbsp;RELAx,&nbsp;investigators","doi":"10.1111/anae.16537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power – volume, pressure or rate – increase mechanical power the most.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3–17.1 [3.7–50.1]) J.min<sup>-1</sup>. In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8–2.6), p &lt; 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2–0.3), p &lt; 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p &lt; 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11–0.19, p &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 5","pages":"533-542"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16537","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction\",\"authors\":\"Laura A. Buiteman-Kruizinga,&nbsp;David M. P. van Meenen,&nbsp;Ary Serpa Neto,&nbsp;Guido Mazzinari,&nbsp;Lieuwe D. J. Bos,&nbsp;Pim L. J. van der Heiden,&nbsp;Frederique Paulus,&nbsp;Marcus J. Schultz,&nbsp;for the NEBULAE,&nbsp;PReVENT,&nbsp;RELAx,&nbsp;investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/anae.16537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power – volume, pressure or rate – increase mechanical power the most.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3–17.1 [3.7–50.1]) J.min<sup>-1</sup>. In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8–2.6), p &lt; 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2–0.3), p &lt; 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p &lt; 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11–0.19, p &lt; 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"80 5\",\"pages\":\"533-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16537\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16537\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16537","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高机械功率与需要有创通气的危重病人的死亡率相关。机械动力的哪个组成部分——体积、压力或速率——最大程度地增加了机械动力,这仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction

Association of ventilation volumes, pressures and rates with the mechanical power of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: exploring the impact of rate reduction

Introduction

High mechanical power is associated with mortality in patients who are critically ill and require invasive ventilation. It remains uncertain which components of mechanical power – volume, pressure or rate – increase mechanical power the most.

Methods

We conducted a post hoc analysis of a database containing individual patient data from three randomised clinical trials of ventilation in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary endpoint was mechanical power. We used linear regression; double stratification to create subgroups of participants; and mediation analysis to assess the impact of changes in volumes, pressures and rates on mechanical power.

Results

A total of 1732 patients were included and analysed. The median (IQR [range]) mechanical power was 12.3 (9.3–17.1 [3.7–50.1]) J.min-1. In linear regression, respiratory rate (36%) and peak pressure (51%) explained most of the increase in mechanical power. Increasing quintiles of peak pressure stratified on constant levels of respiratory rate resulted in higher risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 2.2 (95%CI 1.8–2.6), p < 0.01), while decreasing quintiles of respiratory rate stratified on constant levels of peak pressure resulted in lower risks of high mechanical power (relative risk 0.2 (95%CI 0.2–0.3), p < 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that a reduction in respiratory rate, with the increase in tidal volume, partially mediates an effect of reduction in mechanical power (average causal mediation effect -0.10, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.09, p < 0.01), but still with a direct effect of tidal volume on mechanical power (average direct effect 0.15, 95%CI 0.11–0.19, p < 0.01).

Discussion

In this cohort of patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome, pressure and respiratory rate were the most important determinants of mechanical power. The respiratory rate may be the most attractive ventilator setting to adjust when targeting a lower mechanical power.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信