煤层气:从文献计量学的角度回顾过去到未来的研究方向

IF 5.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Romeo M. Flores , Tim Moore
{"title":"煤层气:从文献计量学的角度回顾过去到未来的研究方向","authors":"Romeo M. Flores ,&nbsp;Tim Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.coal.2024.104683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This bibliometric review used coalbed gas articles published in the International Journal of Coal Geology (IJCG) from 1986 to 2022 catalogued in the Scopus database to compare similar articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database from 1999 to 2016. Comparison focused between highly cited articles (top 1 % versus &gt;100 citations in the WoS and Scopus databases, respectively) from the 2007–2016 period. Analysis of articles in the WoS database reveals research fronts center on modeling fractal pores related to gas adsorption and gas exploration in China's basins (Luo et al., 2017). In contrast, this study of research fronts of articles in the Scopus-IJCG database range from laboratory methods and models of coal reservoir properties; enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide storage; to experiments on microbes, methanogenesis, isotope geochemistry, and biochemical nutrients for biogenic gas generation. Thus, a key difference in coalbed-gas research fronts between the databases is disciplinary breadth for Scopus and discipline specific for WoS.</div><div>Caveats in interpreting analysis of citation numbers about research fronts include high rate of self-citation (“clubbing/inwardness”); researchers maintaining “continuous stream of publications for long periods”; growth of highly cited research of narrow fields with large datasets used to publish for prolonged periods; mass publications (“salami slicing”) to increase citation counts; researchers publishing in high-profile journals indexed by WoS for professional advancement; and experimental methods and review papers more cited than original papers. Also, the fall of gas prices from 2008 to 2014 facilitated rapid decrease in coalbed gas production and caused significant drop in the number of articles published in the IJCG from the United States and Europe. Conversely, the number of coalbed-gas articles from 2008 to 2022 increased 7–52 % for China and 25–33 % for Australia. Finally, analysis of IJCG articles reveals international research collaboration (IRC) grew up to 70 % by 2011 and became more diversified in research topics by 2022. Thus, IRC is the future pathway that brings together researchers to advance new knowledge of coalbed gas such as deep coalbed gas reservoirs to support Just Energy Transition as countries changeover to energy mix that moves away from coal to attain net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13864,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Geology","volume":"298 ","pages":"Article 104683"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coalbed gas: A review of research directions from the past to the future as facilitated by bibliometrics\",\"authors\":\"Romeo M. Flores ,&nbsp;Tim Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.coal.2024.104683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This bibliometric review used coalbed gas articles published in the International Journal of Coal Geology (IJCG) from 1986 to 2022 catalogued in the Scopus database to compare similar articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database from 1999 to 2016. Comparison focused between highly cited articles (top 1 % versus &gt;100 citations in the WoS and Scopus databases, respectively) from the 2007–2016 period. Analysis of articles in the WoS database reveals research fronts center on modeling fractal pores related to gas adsorption and gas exploration in China's basins (Luo et al., 2017). In contrast, this study of research fronts of articles in the Scopus-IJCG database range from laboratory methods and models of coal reservoir properties; enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide storage; to experiments on microbes, methanogenesis, isotope geochemistry, and biochemical nutrients for biogenic gas generation. Thus, a key difference in coalbed-gas research fronts between the databases is disciplinary breadth for Scopus and discipline specific for WoS.</div><div>Caveats in interpreting analysis of citation numbers about research fronts include high rate of self-citation (“clubbing/inwardness”); researchers maintaining “continuous stream of publications for long periods”; growth of highly cited research of narrow fields with large datasets used to publish for prolonged periods; mass publications (“salami slicing”) to increase citation counts; researchers publishing in high-profile journals indexed by WoS for professional advancement; and experimental methods and review papers more cited than original papers. Also, the fall of gas prices from 2008 to 2014 facilitated rapid decrease in coalbed gas production and caused significant drop in the number of articles published in the IJCG from the United States and Europe. Conversely, the number of coalbed-gas articles from 2008 to 2022 increased 7–52 % for China and 25–33 % for Australia. Finally, analysis of IJCG articles reveals international research collaboration (IRC) grew up to 70 % by 2011 and became more diversified in research topics by 2022. Thus, IRC is the future pathway that brings together researchers to advance new knowledge of coalbed gas such as deep coalbed gas reservoirs to support Just Energy Transition as countries changeover to energy mix that moves away from coal to attain net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Coal Geology\",\"volume\":\"298 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104683\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Coal Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516224002404\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Geology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166516224002404","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项文献计量学综述使用了Scopus数据库中1986年至2022年发表在《国际煤炭地质杂志》(IJCG)上的煤层气文章,比较了1999年至2016年在Web of Science (WoS)数据库中检索的类似文章。比较集中于2007-2016年期间高被引文章(分别是WoS和Scopus数据库中引用次数前1%和引用次数前100)。通过对WoS数据库文章的分析发现,中国盆地天然气吸附与勘探相关的分形孔隙建模是研究前沿(Luo et al., 2017)。相比之下,本次研究的Scopus-IJCG数据库中文章的研究前沿包括煤储层物性的实验室方法和模型;提高煤层气采收率和二氧化碳储量;微生物实验、产甲烷实验、同位素地球化学实验、生气生化营养实验。因此,两个数据库在煤层气研究前沿的关键区别在于Scopus的学科广度和WoS的学科特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Coalbed gas: A review of research directions from the past to the future as facilitated by bibliometrics

Coalbed gas: A review of research directions from the past to the future as facilitated by bibliometrics
This bibliometric review used coalbed gas articles published in the International Journal of Coal Geology (IJCG) from 1986 to 2022 catalogued in the Scopus database to compare similar articles indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database from 1999 to 2016. Comparison focused between highly cited articles (top 1 % versus >100 citations in the WoS and Scopus databases, respectively) from the 2007–2016 period. Analysis of articles in the WoS database reveals research fronts center on modeling fractal pores related to gas adsorption and gas exploration in China's basins (Luo et al., 2017). In contrast, this study of research fronts of articles in the Scopus-IJCG database range from laboratory methods and models of coal reservoir properties; enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide storage; to experiments on microbes, methanogenesis, isotope geochemistry, and biochemical nutrients for biogenic gas generation. Thus, a key difference in coalbed-gas research fronts between the databases is disciplinary breadth for Scopus and discipline specific for WoS.
Caveats in interpreting analysis of citation numbers about research fronts include high rate of self-citation (“clubbing/inwardness”); researchers maintaining “continuous stream of publications for long periods”; growth of highly cited research of narrow fields with large datasets used to publish for prolonged periods; mass publications (“salami slicing”) to increase citation counts; researchers publishing in high-profile journals indexed by WoS for professional advancement; and experimental methods and review papers more cited than original papers. Also, the fall of gas prices from 2008 to 2014 facilitated rapid decrease in coalbed gas production and caused significant drop in the number of articles published in the IJCG from the United States and Europe. Conversely, the number of coalbed-gas articles from 2008 to 2022 increased 7–52 % for China and 25–33 % for Australia. Finally, analysis of IJCG articles reveals international research collaboration (IRC) grew up to 70 % by 2011 and became more diversified in research topics by 2022. Thus, IRC is the future pathway that brings together researchers to advance new knowledge of coalbed gas such as deep coalbed gas reservoirs to support Just Energy Transition as countries changeover to energy mix that moves away from coal to attain net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Coal Geology
International Journal of Coal Geology 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
145
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Geology deals with fundamental and applied aspects of the geology and petrology of coal, oil/gas source rocks and shale gas resources. The journal aims to advance the exploration, exploitation and utilization of these resources, and to stimulate environmental awareness as well as advancement of engineering for effective resource management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信