盆底康复对结直肠癌治疗后下前切除术综合征的影响。

Shelby Jones, Alison Edie, Emily Troop, Joshua S Hill, Julie A Thompson
{"title":"盆底康复对结直肠癌治疗后下前切除术综合征的影响。","authors":"Shelby Jones, Alison Edie, Emily Troop, Joshua S Hill, Julie A Thompson","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low anterior resection (LAR) is the preferred surgical treatment of rectosigmoid or rectal cancers. However, it is often associated with bowel dysfunction, which is termed low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Daily bowel dysfunction symptoms have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) can improve pelvic floor function and QOL among patients with LARS. This quality improvement (QI) project seeks to assess the prevalence of LARS and develop and incorporate PFR for the treatment and prevention of LARS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 20 patients met project inclusion. Thirteen patients participated. Individuals were categorized by diagnostic risk: low risk, high risk, and established. The intervention included 1-hour PFR sessions with the physical therapist (PT) and 5 minutes of daily self-led pelvic floor muscle exercises. Outcomes questionnaires included the LARS Score and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) Scale. Data were collected both pre- and post-colorectal cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of LARS was 76.9%, which was significantly higher than the retrospective cohort comparison rate of 21.8% (<i>p</i> < .001). The prevalence of major LARS was 89%, 83%, and 50% at the initial, second, and third sessions, respectively, representing a 44% relative decrease. Embarrassment was significantly affected among individuals with major LARS, although ongoing PFR facilitated improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFR is a valuable adjunct therapy for LARS, with continued sessions decreasing the overall prevalence among the cohort. Major LARS negatively impacts QOL measures early on in treatment but improves with continued PFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715399/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Colorectal Cancer Treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Shelby Jones, Alison Edie, Emily Troop, Joshua S Hill, Julie A Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Low anterior resection (LAR) is the preferred surgical treatment of rectosigmoid or rectal cancers. However, it is often associated with bowel dysfunction, which is termed low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Daily bowel dysfunction symptoms have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) can improve pelvic floor function and QOL among patients with LARS. This quality improvement (QI) project seeks to assess the prevalence of LARS and develop and incorporate PFR for the treatment and prevention of LARS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 20 patients met project inclusion. Thirteen patients participated. Individuals were categorized by diagnostic risk: low risk, high risk, and established. The intervention included 1-hour PFR sessions with the physical therapist (PT) and 5 minutes of daily self-led pelvic floor muscle exercises. Outcomes questionnaires included the LARS Score and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) Scale. Data were collected both pre- and post-colorectal cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of LARS was 76.9%, which was significantly higher than the retrospective cohort comparison rate of 21.8% (<i>p</i> < .001). The prevalence of major LARS was 89%, 83%, and 50% at the initial, second, and third sessions, respectively, representing a 44% relative decrease. Embarrassment was significantly affected among individuals with major LARS, although ongoing PFR facilitated improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PFR is a valuable adjunct therapy for LARS, with continued sessions decreasing the overall prevalence among the cohort. Major LARS negatively impacts QOL measures early on in treatment but improves with continued PFR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715399/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:低位前切除术是治疗直肠乙状结肠或直肠癌的首选手术方法。然而,它通常与肠功能障碍有关,这被称为前低位切除综合征(LARS)。日常肠功能障碍症状对生活质量(QOL)有不利影响。盆底康复治疗(PFR)可改善LARS患者的盆底功能和生活质量。这个质量改进(QI)项目旨在评估LARS的患病率,并开发和纳入PFR来治疗和预防LARS。方法:选取符合项目纳入标准的20例患者作为方便样本。13名患者参与。个体按诊断风险分类:低风险、高风险和已建立。干预包括与物理治疗师(PT)进行1小时的PFR会话和每天5分钟的自我盆底肌肉锻炼。结果问卷包括LARS评分和大便失禁生活质量(FIQOL)量表。数据收集于结直肠癌治疗前后。结果:LARS的总患病率为76.9%,显著高于回顾性队列比较的21.8% (p < 0.001)。在第一次、第二次和第三次治疗中,主要LARS的患病率分别为89%、83%和50%,相对下降了44%。严重LARS患者的尴尬感受到显著影响,尽管持续的PFR有助于改善。结论:PFR是LARS的一种有价值的辅助治疗方法,持续治疗可以降低队列中的总体患病率。主要的LARS对治疗早期的生活质量测量产生负面影响,但随着持续的PFR而改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Colorectal Cancer Treatment.

Purpose: Low anterior resection (LAR) is the preferred surgical treatment of rectosigmoid or rectal cancers. However, it is often associated with bowel dysfunction, which is termed low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Daily bowel dysfunction symptoms have a detrimental effect on quality of life (QOL). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) can improve pelvic floor function and QOL among patients with LARS. This quality improvement (QI) project seeks to assess the prevalence of LARS and develop and incorporate PFR for the treatment and prevention of LARS.

Methods: A convenience sample of 20 patients met project inclusion. Thirteen patients participated. Individuals were categorized by diagnostic risk: low risk, high risk, and established. The intervention included 1-hour PFR sessions with the physical therapist (PT) and 5 minutes of daily self-led pelvic floor muscle exercises. Outcomes questionnaires included the LARS Score and Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQOL) Scale. Data were collected both pre- and post-colorectal cancer treatment.

Results: The overall prevalence of LARS was 76.9%, which was significantly higher than the retrospective cohort comparison rate of 21.8% (p < .001). The prevalence of major LARS was 89%, 83%, and 50% at the initial, second, and third sessions, respectively, representing a 44% relative decrease. Embarrassment was significantly affected among individuals with major LARS, although ongoing PFR facilitated improvement.

Conclusion: PFR is a valuable adjunct therapy for LARS, with continued sessions decreasing the overall prevalence among the cohort. Major LARS negatively impacts QOL measures early on in treatment but improves with continued PFR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信