与患者分享基因组肿瘤测序结果:高级实践肿瘤学提供者的经验。

Lisa Stewart, Anne Floyd Koci, Tracy Brock Lowe, Wesley G Patterson, Christopher L Farrell, Janice S Withycombe
{"title":"与患者分享基因组肿瘤测序结果:高级实践肿瘤学提供者的经验。","authors":"Lisa Stewart, Anne Floyd Koci, Tracy Brock Lowe, Wesley G Patterson, Christopher L Farrell, Janice S Withycombe","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer routinely undergo genomic tumor sequencing, a component of molecular profiling (MP), to better characterize their cancer and identify potential targetable alterations. Targeted treatments potentially confer higher response rates and better efficacy. With increasing complexity, patients may require detailed explanations of MP results. Patient understanding of MP results increases the likelihood that eligible patients receive targeted treatment. Advanced practice providers (APPs), defined as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, frequently review and discuss MP results with patients. Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand APP experiences discussing MP results with adult cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted through virtual semi-structured interviews with APPs recruited via study invitation shared through the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO). Eligibility criteria included APPs with > 1 year of oncology experience and involvement in discussing MP results. Data were analyzed utilizing a constant comparative analysis and coded in three stages: open, axial, and selective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen participants were enrolled from across the United States. Participants discussed learning to understand and explain MP findings primarily through on-the-job experiences. Barriers to patient education were also described. Initially coded participant statements (open codes) produced six themes (axial codes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With MP now standard practice in oncology, APPs frequently discuss these results with patients. This study highlights that additional and continuing education related to MP is needed in communicating complex results. Patient educational tools, specific to patients' MP findings and tailored to their preferences and literacy levels, are critically needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715460/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sharing Genomic Tumor Sequencing Results With Patients: Experiences of Advanced Practice Oncology Providers.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Stewart, Anne Floyd Koci, Tracy Brock Lowe, Wesley G Patterson, Christopher L Farrell, Janice S Withycombe\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cancer routinely undergo genomic tumor sequencing, a component of molecular profiling (MP), to better characterize their cancer and identify potential targetable alterations. Targeted treatments potentially confer higher response rates and better efficacy. With increasing complexity, patients may require detailed explanations of MP results. Patient understanding of MP results increases the likelihood that eligible patients receive targeted treatment. Advanced practice providers (APPs), defined as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, frequently review and discuss MP results with patients. Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand APP experiences discussing MP results with adult cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted through virtual semi-structured interviews with APPs recruited via study invitation shared through the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO). Eligibility criteria included APPs with > 1 year of oncology experience and involvement in discussing MP results. Data were analyzed utilizing a constant comparative analysis and coded in three stages: open, axial, and selective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen participants were enrolled from across the United States. Participants discussed learning to understand and explain MP findings primarily through on-the-job experiences. Barriers to patient education were also described. Initially coded participant statements (open codes) produced six themes (axial codes).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With MP now standard practice in oncology, APPs frequently discuss these results with patients. This study highlights that additional and continuing education related to MP is needed in communicating complex results. Patient educational tools, specific to patients' MP findings and tailored to their preferences and literacy levels, are critically needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11715460/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症患者常规接受肿瘤基因组测序,这是分子谱(MP)的一个组成部分,以更好地表征他们的癌症并识别潜在的靶向改变。靶向治疗可能带来更高的缓解率和更好的疗效。随着复杂性的增加,患者可能需要MP结果的详细解释。患者对MP结果的了解增加了符合条件的患者接受靶向治疗的可能性。高级执业医师(APPs),定义为执业护士、医师助理和药剂师,经常与患者回顾和讨论MP结果。目的:本研究的目的是了解成人癌症患者APP讨论MP结果的经验。方法:通过虚拟半结构化访谈对通过血液与肿瘤高级医师协会(APSHO)共享的研究邀请招募的app进行定性研究。入选标准包括具有10年肿瘤学经验并参与MP结果讨论的临床应用医师。数据分析利用恒定的比较分析和编码三个阶段:开放,轴向和选择性。结果:13名参与者来自美国各地。参与者主要通过工作经验讨论了如何理解和解释MP发现。还描述了患者教育的障碍。最初编码的参与者陈述(开放代码)产生了六个主题(轴向代码)。结论:随着MP成为肿瘤学的标准做法,app经常与患者讨论这些结果。这项研究强调,在沟通复杂的结果时,需要额外的和继续的MP相关的教育。迫切需要针对患者的MP发现并根据其偏好和文化水平量身定制的患者教育工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sharing Genomic Tumor Sequencing Results With Patients: Experiences of Advanced Practice Oncology Providers.

Background: Patients with cancer routinely undergo genomic tumor sequencing, a component of molecular profiling (MP), to better characterize their cancer and identify potential targetable alterations. Targeted treatments potentially confer higher response rates and better efficacy. With increasing complexity, patients may require detailed explanations of MP results. Patient understanding of MP results increases the likelihood that eligible patients receive targeted treatment. Advanced practice providers (APPs), defined as nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists, frequently review and discuss MP results with patients. Purpose: The aim of this study is to understand APP experiences discussing MP results with adult cancer patients.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted through virtual semi-structured interviews with APPs recruited via study invitation shared through the Advanced Practitioner Society for Hematology and Oncology (APSHO). Eligibility criteria included APPs with > 1 year of oncology experience and involvement in discussing MP results. Data were analyzed utilizing a constant comparative analysis and coded in three stages: open, axial, and selective.

Results: Thirteen participants were enrolled from across the United States. Participants discussed learning to understand and explain MP findings primarily through on-the-job experiences. Barriers to patient education were also described. Initially coded participant statements (open codes) produced six themes (axial codes).

Conclusions: With MP now standard practice in oncology, APPs frequently discuss these results with patients. This study highlights that additional and continuing education related to MP is needed in communicating complex results. Patient educational tools, specific to patients' MP findings and tailored to their preferences and literacy levels, are critically needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信