结直肠癌腹膜转移的细胞减少手术和腹腔加热化疗的肿瘤预后。

Nadina Tinsley, Sarah T O'Dwyer, Raghavendar Nagaraju, Michael Braun, Saifee Mullamitha, Konstantinos Kamposioras, F E Marti Marti, Mark Saunders, Hamish Clouston, Chelliah Selvasekar, Jonathan Wild, Malcolm Wilson, Andrew Renehan, Omer Aziz, Jorge Barriuso
{"title":"结直肠癌腹膜转移的细胞减少手术和腹腔加热化疗的肿瘤预后。","authors":"Nadina Tinsley, Sarah T O'Dwyer, Raghavendar Nagaraju, Michael Braun, Saifee Mullamitha, Konstantinos Kamposioras, F E Marti Marti, Mark Saunders, Hamish Clouston, Chelliah Selvasekar, Jonathan Wild, Malcolm Wilson, Andrew Renehan, Omer Aziz, Jorge Barriuso","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is effective for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) at increasing overall survival (OS) compared to systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) alone. The addition of Oxaliplatin heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to result in increased complications without significant OS benefit. This study evaluates outcomes for CRPM patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC with Oxaliplatin (Ox) 368mg/m<sup>2</sup> (30 min), versus Mitomycin C (MMC) 35mg/m<sup>2</sup> (90min).  METHODS: A prospective CRPM real-world database was used to collect outcomes for patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC at a single center. OS, recurrence-free (RFS), peritoneal RFS (PeRFS) were compared amongst all patients with histologically proven CRPM, those with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score =0/1, and those with CC score=0/1 who were SACT naïve.  RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2021, 409 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC: 271 (66%) had MMC, 138 (34%) Ox. Of these, 395 (97%) had histologically confirmed CRPM, 336 (85%) achieved CC=0/1, 188 (47%) were SACT naïve; median OS =39.5, 44.4, and 47.2 months respectively. MMC versus Ox median OS in CC0/1=43.7 (95% CI 35.9-48.3) versus 50.1 (39.7-70.2) months, P = .28; Median OS in SACT naïve=45.7 (39.4-65.9) versus 59.9 (38.3-82.0) months, P = .31; multivariable analysis for CC0/1, SACT naïve patients showed Ox was comparable to MMC: HR=0.90, (0.64-1.27) P = .55 versus HR=0.88, (0.53-1.44) P = .60, respectively. Ox resulted in a significantly improved PeRFS in CC0/1 patients (MMC=9.0 versus Ox=12.6months, P = .01). A multivariable model for PeRFS showed a HR=0.63, (0.43-0.95), P = .03 for Ox.  CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for Ox HIPEC in CRPM which should be explored further in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oncological Outcomes From Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Nadina Tinsley, Sarah T O'Dwyer, Raghavendar Nagaraju, Michael Braun, Saifee Mullamitha, Konstantinos Kamposioras, F E Marti Marti, Mark Saunders, Hamish Clouston, Chelliah Selvasekar, Jonathan Wild, Malcolm Wilson, Andrew Renehan, Omer Aziz, Jorge Barriuso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clcc.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is effective for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) at increasing overall survival (OS) compared to systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) alone. The addition of Oxaliplatin heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to result in increased complications without significant OS benefit. This study evaluates outcomes for CRPM patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC with Oxaliplatin (Ox) 368mg/m<sup>2</sup> (30 min), versus Mitomycin C (MMC) 35mg/m<sup>2</sup> (90min).  METHODS: A prospective CRPM real-world database was used to collect outcomes for patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC at a single center. OS, recurrence-free (RFS), peritoneal RFS (PeRFS) were compared amongst all patients with histologically proven CRPM, those with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score =0/1, and those with CC score=0/1 who were SACT naïve.  RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2021, 409 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC: 271 (66%) had MMC, 138 (34%) Ox. Of these, 395 (97%) had histologically confirmed CRPM, 336 (85%) achieved CC=0/1, 188 (47%) were SACT naïve; median OS =39.5, 44.4, and 47.2 months respectively. MMC versus Ox median OS in CC0/1=43.7 (95% CI 35.9-48.3) versus 50.1 (39.7-70.2) months, P = .28; Median OS in SACT naïve=45.7 (39.4-65.9) versus 59.9 (38.3-82.0) months, P = .31; multivariable analysis for CC0/1, SACT naïve patients showed Ox was comparable to MMC: HR=0.90, (0.64-1.27) P = .55 versus HR=0.88, (0.53-1.44) P = .60, respectively. Ox resulted in a significantly improved PeRFS in CC0/1 patients (MMC=9.0 versus Ox=12.6months, P = .01). A multivariable model for PeRFS showed a HR=0.63, (0.43-0.95), P = .03 for Ox.  CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for Ox HIPEC in CRPM which should be explored further in clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical colorectal cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2024.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与单纯全身抗癌治疗(SACT)相比,腹腔镜手术(CRS)能有效提高结直肠癌腹膜转移(CRPM)患者的总生存率(OS)。一项随机对照试验显示,加用奥沙利铂腹腔内加温化疗(HIPEC)会导致并发症增加,但对 OS 却无明显益处。本研究评估了接受奥沙利铂(Ox)368mg/m2(30 分钟)与丝裂霉素 C(MMC)35mg/m2(90 分钟)CRS+HIPEC 的 CRPM 患者的疗效。方法:使用前瞻性 CRPM 真实世界数据库收集在单个中心接受 CRS+HIPEC 治疗的患者的疗效。在所有经组织学证实的CRPM患者、细胞减灭完全性(CC)评分=0/1的患者和CC评分=0/1但未接受SACT的患者中比较了OS、无复发(RFS)和腹膜RFS(PeRFS)。结果:2005年4月至2021年4月,409名患者接受了CRS+HIPEC治疗:271人(66%)接受了MMC治疗,138人(34%)接受了Ox治疗。其中,395 例(97%)经组织学证实为 CRPM,336 例(85%)达到 CC=0/1,188 例(47%)为 SACT 天真患者;中位 OS 分别为 39.5、44.4 和 47.2 个月。MMC与Ox相比,CC0/1的中位OS=43.7(95% CI 35.9-48.3)个月对50.1(39.7-70.2)个月,P = .28;SACT新患者的中位OS=45.7(39.4-65.9)个月对59.9(38.3-82.0)个月,P = .31;对CC0/1、SACT新患者的多变量分析显示,Ox与MMC的疗效相当:HR=0.90,(0.64-1.27)P=.55对HR=0.88,(0.53-1.44)P=.60。Ox可明显改善CC0/1患者的PeRFS(MMC=9.0个月对Ox=12.6个月,P = .01)。PeRFS的多变量模型显示,Ox的HR=0.63,(0.43-0.95),P=0.03。结论:本研究表明,Ox HIPEC 可在 CRPM 中发挥作用,应在临床试验中进一步探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oncological Outcomes From Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Peritoneal Metastases.

Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) is effective for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases (CRPM) at increasing overall survival (OS) compared to systemic anticancer treatment (SACT) alone. The addition of Oxaliplatin heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown in a randomized controlled trial to result in increased complications without significant OS benefit. This study evaluates outcomes for CRPM patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC with Oxaliplatin (Ox) 368mg/m2 (30 min), versus Mitomycin C (MMC) 35mg/m2 (90min).  METHODS: A prospective CRPM real-world database was used to collect outcomes for patients undergoing CRS+HIPEC at a single center. OS, recurrence-free (RFS), peritoneal RFS (PeRFS) were compared amongst all patients with histologically proven CRPM, those with completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score =0/1, and those with CC score=0/1 who were SACT naïve.  RESULTS: Between April 2005 and April 2021, 409 patients underwent CRS+HIPEC: 271 (66%) had MMC, 138 (34%) Ox. Of these, 395 (97%) had histologically confirmed CRPM, 336 (85%) achieved CC=0/1, 188 (47%) were SACT naïve; median OS =39.5, 44.4, and 47.2 months respectively. MMC versus Ox median OS in CC0/1=43.7 (95% CI 35.9-48.3) versus 50.1 (39.7-70.2) months, P = .28; Median OS in SACT naïve=45.7 (39.4-65.9) versus 59.9 (38.3-82.0) months, P = .31; multivariable analysis for CC0/1, SACT naïve patients showed Ox was comparable to MMC: HR=0.90, (0.64-1.27) P = .55 versus HR=0.88, (0.53-1.44) P = .60, respectively. Ox resulted in a significantly improved PeRFS in CC0/1 patients (MMC=9.0 versus Ox=12.6months, P = .01). A multivariable model for PeRFS showed a HR=0.63, (0.43-0.95), P = .03 for Ox.  CONCLUSION: This study suggests a role for Ox HIPEC in CRPM which should be explored further in clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信