Brock R Townsend, Sarah T Malka, Sean G Di Paola, Andrea E Nisly, Brian W Gilbert
{"title":"哌利多用于急诊科减少吗啡当量的腹痛。“梦想者”研究。","authors":"Brock R Townsend, Sarah T Malka, Sean G Di Paola, Andrea E Nisly, Brian W Gilbert","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25-5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12-30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0-20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"31-34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DRopEridol for Abdominal pain in the emergency department for Morphine Equivalent Reduction. The DREAMER study.\",\"authors\":\"Brock R Townsend, Sarah T Malka, Sean G Di Paola, Andrea E Nisly, Brian W Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25-5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12-30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0-20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"31-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
DRopEridol for Abdominal pain in the emergency department for Morphine Equivalent Reduction. The DREAMER study.
Introduction: Droperidol is a dopamine-2 receptor antagonist in the class of butyrophenone antipsychotics with antiemetic, sedative, analgesic, and anxiolytic properties. In the postoperative setting, droperidol provides an opioid sparing effect and decreases nausea/vomiting. Another butyrophenone antipsychotic, haloperidol, has been shown to reduce morphine milliequivalents (MME) administered when used for abdominal pain in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the use of droperidol for undifferentiated abdominal pain reduces the amount of MME administered in the ED.
Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients ≥18 years old who presented to the ED for undifferentiated abdominal pain. Patients must have had two separate encounters for abdominal pain, one encounter where they received droperidol and one encounter where they did not receive droperidol but did receive an opioid. The primary outcome was the difference in MME administered between the two separate patient encounters. Secondary outcomes included utilization rates of rescue antiemetics, rescue analgesics, admission to the hospital, hospital length of stay, and adverse effects (including arrhythmias and extrapyramidal symptoms).
Results: Fifty patients with self-matched encounters were evaluated. A majority of the patients were female (33/50, 66 %) with a median age of 38 years old. All doses of droperidol were intravenous and the majority of patients received a dose of 2.5 mg (34/50, 68 %; range 1.25-5 mg). Non-droperidol encounters received significantly more MME compared to droperidol encounters (19.4 MME [IQR 12-30] vs 10 MME [IQR 0-20], p-value 0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences between the secondary outcomes.
Conclusion: Among patients presenting to the ED for abdominal pain, droperidol administration resulted in a significant reduction in MME administration. Future research should include prospective studies, comparison of droperidol to haloperidol, and investigate droperidol use beyond the ED for these encounters.
期刊介绍:
A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.