评估异位骨化所致肘关节僵硬手术治疗后的长期疗效。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Stanley Liu, Andrew L Chen, Krishin Shivdasani, Nickolas G Garbis, Dane H Salazar
{"title":"评估异位骨化所致肘关节僵硬手术治疗后的长期疗效。","authors":"Stanley Liu, Andrew L Chen, Krishin Shivdasani, Nickolas G Garbis, Dane H Salazar","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow resulting in limited motion is a relatively uncommon condition often caused by burns, trauma, and central nervous system injuries. This retrospective study presents the long-term outcomes of 51 cases of elbow HO treated with surgical excision and regimented postoperative rehabilitation protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was conducted on 48 patients (51 elbows) who underwent surgical excision of elbow heterotopic ossification. All procedures were performed in the inpatient setting at an Academic Level I Trauma Center between September 1999 and August 2022 by fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. Patient demographics and case characteristics such as age, gender, mechanism of injury, and comorbidities were collected for comparison. Long-term follow-up examinations were elbow flexion-extension arcs, pronosupination arcs, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-24 years). The median flexion-extension arc at final follow-up was 110° (95°-130°), which was maintained at 85% of the intraoperative arc achieved. Pronosupination arc at final follow-up was 170° (105°-180°), which was maintained at 97% of intraoperative levels. The median reported MEPS and VAS scores were 80 (70-93) and 2 (0-4), respectively. Although it wasn't statistically significant, patients diagnosed with type II diabetes had the worst flexion-extension arcs at final follow-up and highest complication rates compared to other risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical excision coupled with HO prophylaxis and a regimented rehabilitation program resulted in a lasting improvement in functional outcomes for patients with elbow dysfunction secondary to heterotopic ossification at long term follow-up. Overall, patients maintained substantial reductions in pain, improvement in elbow range of motion, and increased overall elbow function.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Long-Term Outcomes after Operative Management of Elbow Stiffness Secondary to Heterotopic Ossification.\",\"authors\":\"Stanley Liu, Andrew L Chen, Krishin Shivdasani, Nickolas G Garbis, Dane H Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow resulting in limited motion is a relatively uncommon condition often caused by burns, trauma, and central nervous system injuries. This retrospective study presents the long-term outcomes of 51 cases of elbow HO treated with surgical excision and regimented postoperative rehabilitation protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case series was conducted on 48 patients (51 elbows) who underwent surgical excision of elbow heterotopic ossification. All procedures were performed in the inpatient setting at an Academic Level I Trauma Center between September 1999 and August 2022 by fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. Patient demographics and case characteristics such as age, gender, mechanism of injury, and comorbidities were collected for comparison. Long-term follow-up examinations were elbow flexion-extension arcs, pronosupination arcs, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-24 years). The median flexion-extension arc at final follow-up was 110° (95°-130°), which was maintained at 85% of the intraoperative arc achieved. Pronosupination arc at final follow-up was 170° (105°-180°), which was maintained at 97% of intraoperative levels. The median reported MEPS and VAS scores were 80 (70-93) and 2 (0-4), respectively. Although it wasn't statistically significant, patients diagnosed with type II diabetes had the worst flexion-extension arcs at final follow-up and highest complication rates compared to other risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical excision coupled with HO prophylaxis and a regimented rehabilitation program resulted in a lasting improvement in functional outcomes for patients with elbow dysfunction secondary to heterotopic ossification at long term follow-up. Overall, patients maintained substantial reductions in pain, improvement in elbow range of motion, and increased overall elbow function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肘关节异位骨化(HO)导致运动受限是一种相对罕见的疾病,通常由烧伤、创伤和中枢神经系统损伤引起。本回顾性研究报告了51例肘关节骨组织手术切除和术后康复方案治疗的长期结果。方法:回顾性分析48例(51例肘关节)手术切除肘关节异位骨化的病例。在1999年9月至2022年8月期间,所有手术均由受过奖学金培训的上肢外科医生在学术一级创伤中心的住院环境中进行。收集患者人口统计资料和病例特征,如年龄、性别、损伤机制和合并症进行比较。长期随访检查肘关节屈伸弧度、旋前弧度、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分和Mayo肘关节功能评分(MEPS)。结果:患者至少随访2年,平均随访8年(范围2-24年)。最终随访时屈伸中位弧度为110°(95°-130°),维持术中弧度的85%。最后随访时旋前弧度为170°(105°-180°),维持术中97%的水平。MEPS和VAS评分中位数分别为80(70-93)和2(0-4)。虽然没有统计学意义,但与其他危险因素相比,诊断为II型糖尿病的患者在最后随访时屈伸弧度最差,并发症发生率最高。结论:在长期随访中,手术切除结合HO预防和有组织的康复计划可持久改善异位骨化继发肘关节功能障碍患者的功能结局。总体而言,患者疼痛明显减轻,肘关节活动范围改善,肘关节整体功能增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Long-Term Outcomes after Operative Management of Elbow Stiffness Secondary to Heterotopic Ossification.

Background: Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the elbow resulting in limited motion is a relatively uncommon condition often caused by burns, trauma, and central nervous system injuries. This retrospective study presents the long-term outcomes of 51 cases of elbow HO treated with surgical excision and regimented postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Methods: A retrospective case series was conducted on 48 patients (51 elbows) who underwent surgical excision of elbow heterotopic ossification. All procedures were performed in the inpatient setting at an Academic Level I Trauma Center between September 1999 and August 2022 by fellowship-trained upper extremity surgeons. Patient demographics and case characteristics such as age, gender, mechanism of injury, and comorbidities were collected for comparison. Long-term follow-up examinations were elbow flexion-extension arcs, pronosupination arcs, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS).

Results: Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years with an average follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-24 years). The median flexion-extension arc at final follow-up was 110° (95°-130°), which was maintained at 85% of the intraoperative arc achieved. Pronosupination arc at final follow-up was 170° (105°-180°), which was maintained at 97% of intraoperative levels. The median reported MEPS and VAS scores were 80 (70-93) and 2 (0-4), respectively. Although it wasn't statistically significant, patients diagnosed with type II diabetes had the worst flexion-extension arcs at final follow-up and highest complication rates compared to other risk factors.

Conclusion: Surgical excision coupled with HO prophylaxis and a regimented rehabilitation program resulted in a lasting improvement in functional outcomes for patients with elbow dysfunction secondary to heterotopic ossification at long term follow-up. Overall, patients maintained substantial reductions in pain, improvement in elbow range of motion, and increased overall elbow function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信