[covid -19后功能状态量表:评估者给药版本与自评版本在covid -19后综合征患者中的一致性]。

Q3 Medicine
J. Betancourt-Peña , J. Rodriguez-Castro , V. Perez-Hortua , J.C. Ávila-Valencia , V. Benavides-Córdoba
{"title":"[covid -19后功能状态量表:评估者给药版本与自评版本在covid -19后综合征患者中的一致性]。","authors":"J. Betancourt-Peña ,&nbsp;J. Rodriguez-Castro ,&nbsp;V. Perez-Hortua ,&nbsp;J.C. Ávila-Valencia ,&nbsp;V. Benavides-Córdoba","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may present sequelae which are called Post COVID-19 Syndrome or Long COVID in which physical, psychological and/or social complications are evident. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS) of the evaluator-administered version vs patient self-assessed in post-COVID-19 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with subsequent recovery. Once the project was approved by the ethics committee and the patients signed the informed consent, a survey was carried out to collect sociodemographic and clinical data and the application of the PCFS scale, in its two forms, self-administered and by an evaluator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>97 patients entered the study, 57.7% being women. The agreement analysis determined a concordance index of 0.857 95% CI (0.7-0.934) (almost perfect agreement). The agreement for women was 0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934 and for men 0.907 95% CI (0.806-1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of the Spanish version of the PCFS scale carried out by the health professional compared to the version self-assessed by patients, demonstrates adequate agreement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 1","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19: concordancia entre la versión administrada por evaluador versus autoevaluada en pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"J. Betancourt-Peña ,&nbsp;J. Rodriguez-Castro ,&nbsp;V. Perez-Hortua ,&nbsp;J.C. Ávila-Valencia ,&nbsp;V. Benavides-Córdoba\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may present sequelae which are called Post COVID-19 Syndrome or Long COVID in which physical, psychological and/or social complications are evident. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS) of the evaluator-administered version vs patient self-assessed in post-COVID-19 patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Observational study in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with subsequent recovery. Once the project was approved by the ethics committee and the patients signed the informed consent, a survey was carried out to collect sociodemographic and clinical data and the application of the PCFS scale, in its two forms, self-administered and by an evaluator.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>97 patients entered the study, 57.7% being women. The agreement analysis determined a concordance index of 0.857 95% CI (0.7-0.934) (almost perfect agreement). The agreement for women was 0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934 and for men 0.907 95% CI (0.806-1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The use of the Spanish version of the PCFS scale carried out by the health professional compared to the version self-assessed by patients, demonstrates adequate agreement.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

诊断为COVID-19的患者可能出现被称为COVID-19后综合征或长COVID的后遗症,其中身体、心理和/或社会并发症很明显。本研究的目的是评估评估者给药版本的covid -19后功能状态量表(PCFS)与患者自我评估的covid -19后患者的一致性。方法:对确诊后康复的COVID-19患者进行观察性研究。一旦项目获得伦理委员会的批准,患者签署知情同意书,就开始进行调查,收集社会人口统计学和临床数据,并应用PCFS量表,有两种形式,一种是自我管理的,另一种是由评估者管理的。结果:97例患者入组,其中57.7%为女性。一致性分析确定一致性指数为0.857,95% CI(0.7 ~ 0.934)(几乎完全一致)。女性的一致性为0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934,男性为0.907 95% CI(0.806-1)。结论:卫生专业人员编制的西班牙语版PCFS量表与患者自行评定的PCFS量表比较,显示出充分的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Escala de estado funcional post-COVID-19: concordancia entre la versión administrada por evaluador versus autoevaluada en pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19

Introduction

Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 may present sequelae which are called Post COVID-19 Syndrome or Long COVID in which physical, psychological and/or social complications are evident. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS) of the evaluator-administered version vs patient self-assessed in post-COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Observational study in patients diagnosed with COVID-19 with subsequent recovery. Once the project was approved by the ethics committee and the patients signed the informed consent, a survey was carried out to collect sociodemographic and clinical data and the application of the PCFS scale, in its two forms, self-administered and by an evaluator.

Results

97 patients entered the study, 57.7% being women. The agreement analysis determined a concordance index of 0.857 95% CI (0.7-0.934) (almost perfect agreement). The agreement for women was 0.817 95% CI 0.700-0.934 and for men 0.907 95% CI (0.806-1).

Conclusion

The use of the Spanish version of the PCFS scale carried out by the health professional compared to the version self-assessed by patients, demonstrates adequate agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信