动态对比增强成像到磁共振引导直线加速器在头颈癌患者中的转换。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689
Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor
{"title":"动态对比增强成像到磁共振引导直线加速器在头颈癌患者中的转换。","authors":"Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including K<sup>trans</sup> were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline K<sup>trans</sup> estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min<sup>-1</sup> (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min<sup>-1</sup> (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in K<sup>trans</sup> was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"100689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including K<sup>trans</sup> were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline K<sup>trans</sup> estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min<sup>-1</sup> (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min<sup>-1</sup> (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in K<sup>trans</sup> was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"100689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:磁共振成像-线性加速器(MRI-linac)系统允许肿瘤成像指导治疗。动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI可以检查肿瘤灌注情况。我们评估了在头颈癌(HNC)患者的1.5 T mri直线上进行DCE-MRI的可行性,并测量了生物标志物的可重复性和对放疗效果的敏感性。材料和方法:患者在治疗前两次在1.5 T mri直线仪或1.5 T诊断MR系统上成像。计算包括Ktrans在内的DCE-MRI参数,并使用修正的赤池信息准则确定最佳药代动力学模型。用受试者内变异系数(wCV)评价重复性。以放射治疗第2周时测量的变化来评估治疗效果。结果:纳入14例患者(6例诊断MR扫描,8例mri直线扫描),共24个病灶。两种MR系统的基线Ktrans估计值具有可比性;0.13 [95% CI: 0.10至0.16]min-1(诊断MR)和0.15[0.12至0.18]min-1 (mri线性)。wCV值为22.6% (95% CI: 16.2 ~ 37.3%)(诊断MR)和11.7% (mri线性)(8.4 ~ 19.3%)。结论:DCE-MRI在1.5 T MRI-linac系统上对HNC患者是可行的。参数估计、可重复性和对治疗的敏感性与传统诊断MR系统测量的结果相似。这些数据支持在MRI-linac研究中使用DCE-MRI来评估治疗反应和基于肿瘤灌注的适应性指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer.

Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.

Materials and methods: Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including Ktrans were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.

Results: 14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline Ktrans estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min-1 (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min-1 (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in Ktrans was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.

Conclusions: DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信