Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor
{"title":"动态对比增强成像到磁共振引导直线加速器在头颈癌患者中的转换。","authors":"Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including K<sup>trans</sup> were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline K<sup>trans</sup> estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min<sup>-1</sup> (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min<sup>-1</sup> (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in K<sup>trans</sup> was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"100689"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Michael J Dubec, Michael Berks, James Price, Lisa McDaid, John Gaffney, Ross A Little, Susan Cheung, Marcel van Herk, Ananya Choudhury, Julian C Matthews, Andrew McPartlin, Geoff J M Parker, David L Buckley, James P B O'Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including K<sup>trans</sup> were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline K<sup>trans</sup> estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min<sup>-1</sup> (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min<sup>-1</sup> (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in K<sup>trans</sup> was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"100689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721217/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:磁共振成像-线性加速器(MRI-linac)系统允许肿瘤成像指导治疗。动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI可以检查肿瘤灌注情况。我们评估了在头颈癌(HNC)患者的1.5 T mri直线上进行DCE-MRI的可行性,并测量了生物标志物的可重复性和对放疗效果的敏感性。材料和方法:患者在治疗前两次在1.5 T mri直线仪或1.5 T诊断MR系统上成像。计算包括Ktrans在内的DCE-MRI参数,并使用修正的赤池信息准则确定最佳药代动力学模型。用受试者内变异系数(wCV)评价重复性。以放射治疗第2周时测量的变化来评估治疗效果。结果:纳入14例患者(6例诊断MR扫描,8例mri直线扫描),共24个病灶。两种MR系统的基线Ktrans估计值具有可比性;0.13 [95% CI: 0.10至0.16]min-1(诊断MR)和0.15[0.12至0.18]min-1 (mri线性)。wCV值为22.6% (95% CI: 16.2 ~ 37.3%)(诊断MR)和11.7% (mri线性)(8.4 ~ 19.3%)。结论:DCE-MRI在1.5 T MRI-linac系统上对HNC患者是可行的。参数估计、可重复性和对治疗的敏感性与传统诊断MR系统测量的结果相似。这些数据支持在MRI-linac研究中使用DCE-MRI来评估治疗反应和基于肿瘤灌注的适应性指导。
Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer.
Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects.
Materials and methods: Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including Ktrans were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy.
Results: 14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline Ktrans estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min-1 (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min-1 (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in Ktrans was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters.
Conclusions: DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.