基于人工智能的高性能盆区锥形束计算机断层成像系统自动分割评估。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2024.100687
Judith H Sluijter, Agustinus J A J van de Schoot, Abdelmounaim El Yaakoubi, Maartje de Jong, Martine S van der Knaap-van Dongen, Britt Kunnen, Nienke D Sijtsema, Joan J Penninkhof, Kim C de Vries, Steven F Petit, Maarten L P Dirkx
{"title":"基于人工智能的高性能盆区锥形束计算机断层成像系统自动分割评估。","authors":"Judith H Sluijter, Agustinus J A J van de Schoot, Abdelmounaim El Yaakoubi, Maartje de Jong, Martine S van der Knaap-van Dongen, Britt Kunnen, Nienke D Sijtsema, Joan J Penninkhof, Kim C de Vries, Steven F Petit, Maarten L P Dirkx","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A novel ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging system shows improved image quality compared to its conventional version, but its effect on autosegmentation is unknown. This study evaluates the impact of this high-performance CBCT on autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability, contour correction times and delineation confidence, compared to the conventional CBCT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Per patient, one pair of high-performance CBCT and conventional CBCT scans was included. Three observers manually corrected contours generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) model for prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum and bowel. Differences between AI-based and manual corrected contours were quantified using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Autosegmentation performance and interobserver variation were compared using a random effects model; correction times and confidence scores using a paired <i>t</i>-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autosegmentation performance showed small, but statistically insignificant differences. Interobserver variability, assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was significantly different across most organs, but these were considered clinically irrelevant (maximum difference = 0.08). Mean contour correction times were similar for both CBCT systems (11:03 versus 11:12 min; p = 0.66). Delineation confidence scores were significantly higher with the high-performance CBCT scans for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum (4.5 versus 3.5, 4.3 versus 3.5, 4.8 versus 4.3; all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high-performance CBCT did not (clinically) improve autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability or contour correction time compared to conventional CBCT. However, it clearly enhanced user confidence in organ delineation for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum.</p>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"100687"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation for a high-performance cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in the pelvic region.\",\"authors\":\"Judith H Sluijter, Agustinus J A J van de Schoot, Abdelmounaim El Yaakoubi, Maartje de Jong, Martine S van der Knaap-van Dongen, Britt Kunnen, Nienke D Sijtsema, Joan J Penninkhof, Kim C de Vries, Steven F Petit, Maarten L P Dirkx\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>A novel ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging system shows improved image quality compared to its conventional version, but its effect on autosegmentation is unknown. This study evaluates the impact of this high-performance CBCT on autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability, contour correction times and delineation confidence, compared to the conventional CBCT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Per patient, one pair of high-performance CBCT and conventional CBCT scans was included. Three observers manually corrected contours generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) model for prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum and bowel. Differences between AI-based and manual corrected contours were quantified using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Autosegmentation performance and interobserver variation were compared using a random effects model; correction times and confidence scores using a paired <i>t</i>-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Autosegmentation performance showed small, but statistically insignificant differences. Interobserver variability, assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was significantly different across most organs, but these were considered clinically irrelevant (maximum difference = 0.08). Mean contour correction times were similar for both CBCT systems (11:03 versus 11:12 min; p = 0.66). Delineation confidence scores were significantly higher with the high-performance CBCT scans for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum (4.5 versus 3.5, 4.3 versus 3.5, 4.8 versus 4.3; all p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high-performance CBCT did not (clinically) improve autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability or contour correction time compared to conventional CBCT. However, it clearly enhanced user confidence in organ delineation for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"100687\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11721864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:一种新型的环龙门锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)成像系统与传统的CBCT成像系统相比,图像质量有所提高,但其对自动分割的影响尚不清楚。与传统的CBCT相比,本研究评估了这种高性能CBCT在自动分割性能、观察者间可变性、轮廓校正时间和描绘置信度方面的影响。材料与方法:本前瞻性临床研究纳入20例前列腺癌患者。每位患者包括一对高性能CBCT和常规CBCT扫描。三名观察者手动校正了人工智能(AI)模型生成的前列腺、精囊、膀胱、直肠和肠道的轮廓。采用Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC)和Hausdorff distance (HD95)的第95百分位来量化人工智能和人工校正轮廓之间的差异。采用随机效应模型对自动分割性能和观察者间方差进行比较;修正时间和置信分数分别使用配对t检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验。结果:自动分割性能差异不大,但无统计学意义。通过类内相关系数评估的观察者间变异性在大多数器官之间存在显著差异,但这些差异被认为与临床无关(最大差异= 0.08)。两种CBCT系统的平均轮廓校正时间相似(11:03 vs 11:12 min;p = 0.66)。前列腺、精囊和直肠的高性能CBCT扫描的描绘置信度评分显著更高(4.5对3.5,4.3对3.5,4.8对4.3;结论:与传统CBCT相比,高性能CBCT并没有(临床上)改善自动分割性能、观察者间变异性或轮廓校正时间。然而,它明显增强了用户对前列腺、精囊和直肠器官描绘的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation for a high-performance cone-beam computed tomography imaging system in the pelvic region.

Background and purpose: A novel ring-gantry cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging system shows improved image quality compared to its conventional version, but its effect on autosegmentation is unknown. This study evaluates the impact of this high-performance CBCT on autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability, contour correction times and delineation confidence, compared to the conventional CBCT.

Materials and methods: Twenty prostate cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Per patient, one pair of high-performance CBCT and conventional CBCT scans was included. Three observers manually corrected contours generated by the artificial intelligence (AI) model for prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum and bowel. Differences between AI-based and manual corrected contours were quantified using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). Autosegmentation performance and interobserver variation were compared using a random effects model; correction times and confidence scores using a paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, respectively.

Results: Autosegmentation performance showed small, but statistically insignificant differences. Interobserver variability, assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient, was significantly different across most organs, but these were considered clinically irrelevant (maximum difference = 0.08). Mean contour correction times were similar for both CBCT systems (11:03 versus 11:12 min; p = 0.66). Delineation confidence scores were significantly higher with the high-performance CBCT scans for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum (4.5 versus 3.5, 4.3 versus 3.5, 4.8 versus 4.3; all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The high-performance CBCT did not (clinically) improve autosegmentation performance, inter-observer variability or contour correction time compared to conventional CBCT. However, it clearly enhanced user confidence in organ delineation for prostate, seminal vesicles and rectum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信