静脉注射右美托咪定和氯胺酮联合股神经阻滞治疗脊柱麻醉前股骨骨折患者体位疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Jyotsna Ch V, Sapna Annaji Nikhar, Akhya Kumar Kar, Padmaja Durga
{"title":"静脉注射右美托咪定和氯胺酮联合股神经阻滞治疗脊柱麻醉前股骨骨折患者体位疼痛的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Jyotsna Ch V, Sapna Annaji Nikhar, Akhya Kumar Kar, Padmaja Durga","doi":"10.1177/17504589231224559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with femur fracture is extremely painful and various methods have been tried to reduce mobilisation pain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine, ketamine and femoral nerve block in patients posted for fractured femur for alleviating the positional pain before spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 75 patients (25 per group) of American Society of Anaesthetists Grade I-III patients of age group 18-80 years with fractured femur scheduled for elective surgery. All patients in Group C (n = 25) were given the femoral nerve block, Group D (n = 25) were given intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg and Group K (n = 25) were given intravenous ketamine 0.3mg/kg. The parameters assessed were quantitative relief of pain by a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction score, quality of patient positioning and time to perform spinal anaesthesia along with hemodynamics and sedation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain scores and patient satisfaction scores were significantly decreased in all three groups but were much significantly lower in Group K.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ketamine was found to be superior to the other two groups in terms of reducing positional pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589231224559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketamine with femoral nerve block for positional pain before spinal anaesthesia in patients with fracture femur: A prospective randomised study.\",\"authors\":\"Jyotsna Ch V, Sapna Annaji Nikhar, Akhya Kumar Kar, Padmaja Durga\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17504589231224559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with femur fracture is extremely painful and various methods have been tried to reduce mobilisation pain.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine, ketamine and femoral nerve block in patients posted for fractured femur for alleviating the positional pain before spinal anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 75 patients (25 per group) of American Society of Anaesthetists Grade I-III patients of age group 18-80 years with fractured femur scheduled for elective surgery. All patients in Group C (n = 25) were given the femoral nerve block, Group D (n = 25) were given intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg and Group K (n = 25) were given intravenous ketamine 0.3mg/kg. The parameters assessed were quantitative relief of pain by a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction score, quality of patient positioning and time to perform spinal anaesthesia along with hemodynamics and sedation score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pain scores and patient satisfaction scores were significantly decreased in all three groups but were much significantly lower in Group K.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ketamine was found to be superior to the other two groups in terms of reducing positional pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17504589231224559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of perioperative practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589231224559\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589231224559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:股骨骨折患者脊柱麻醉的患者体位是非常痛苦的,已经尝试了各种方法来减少活动疼痛。目的:比较右美托咪定、氯胺酮和股神经阻滞治疗股骨骨折患者脊柱麻醉前体位痛的镇痛效果。材料与方法:选取美国麻醉学会I-III级患者75例(每组25例),年龄18-80岁,股骨骨折择期手术。C组(n = 25)给予股神经阻滞,D组(n = 25)给予右美托咪定0.5µg/kg静脉注射,K组(n = 25)给予氯胺酮0.3mg/kg静脉注射。评估的参数是通过数值评定量表和患者满意度评分定量缓解疼痛,患者体位质量和执行脊髓麻醉的时间以及血流动力学和镇静评分。结果:三组患者疼痛评分和患者满意度评分均显著降低,但k组明显低于k组。结论:氯胺酮在减轻体位疼痛方面优于其他两组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of intravenous dexmedetomidine and ketamine with femoral nerve block for positional pain before spinal anaesthesia in patients with fracture femur: A prospective randomised study.

Introduction: Patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients with femur fracture is extremely painful and various methods have been tried to reduce mobilisation pain.

Aim: To compare the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine, ketamine and femoral nerve block in patients posted for fractured femur for alleviating the positional pain before spinal anaesthesia.

Materials and methods: A total of 75 patients (25 per group) of American Society of Anaesthetists Grade I-III patients of age group 18-80 years with fractured femur scheduled for elective surgery. All patients in Group C (n = 25) were given the femoral nerve block, Group D (n = 25) were given intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg and Group K (n = 25) were given intravenous ketamine 0.3mg/kg. The parameters assessed were quantitative relief of pain by a numerical rating scale and patient satisfaction score, quality of patient positioning and time to perform spinal anaesthesia along with hemodynamics and sedation score.

Results: The pain scores and patient satisfaction scores were significantly decreased in all three groups but were much significantly lower in Group K.

Conclusion: Ketamine was found to be superior to the other two groups in terms of reducing positional pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信