对疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征患者行82rb -正电子发射断层扫描(82Rb-PET)的三种诊断算法进行评估,以降低正常扫描率、辐射暴露和成本。

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger
{"title":"对疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征患者行82rb -正电子发射断层扫描(82Rb-PET)的三种诊断算法进行评估,以降低正常扫描率、辐射暴露和成本。","authors":"Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three diagnostic algorithms to reduce normal scan rates, radiation exposure and costs in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET).\",\"authors\":\"Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751945/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)患者的功能性缺血试验结果正常。实施患者预选的“看门人”,如预测概率(PTP)和/或冠状动脉钙评分(CACS),可以减少正常扫描结果的数量、辐射暴露和成本。然而,这些方法的有效性和安全性仍不清楚。方法:根据2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC) CCS指南总结的三种基于PTP的诊断算法,回顾性应用于1792例进行82rb -正电子发射断层扫描(82Rb-PET)的疑似CCS患者:(1)如果PTP≤5%,则推迟检测;结果:患者平均年龄65±11岁,女性占43%。结论:采用PTP与CACS相结合的诊断算法(算法3),可显著减少正常扫描结果的数量、辐射暴露和费用,而漏诊率不显著增加,结果相似,患者安全性好。因此,这种方法可以帮助优化分配有限的医疗资源,同时保持患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of three diagnostic algorithms to reduce normal scan rates, radiation exposure and costs in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (82Rb-PET).

Background: The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.

Methods: Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (82Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).

Results: The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).

Conclusion: Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信