Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger
{"title":"对疑似慢性冠状动脉综合征患者行82rb -正电子发射断层扫描(82Rb-PET)的三种诊断算法进行评估,以降低正常扫描率、辐射暴露和成本。","authors":"Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of three diagnostic algorithms to reduce normal scan rates, radiation exposure and costs in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET).\",\"authors\":\"Simon M Frey, Gabrielle Huré, Jan-Philipp Leibfarth, Kathrin Thommen, Melissa L Amrein, Ibrahim Schaefer, Klara Rumora, Igor G Schneider, Federico Caobelli, Damian Wild, Philip Haaf, Felix Mahfoud, Christian Müller, Michael J Zellweger\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (<sup>82</sup>Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751945/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of three diagnostic algorithms to reduce normal scan rates, radiation exposure and costs in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (82Rb-PET).
Background: The majority of functional ischemia tests in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) yield normal results. Implementing gatekeepers for patient preselection, such as pretest probability (PTP) and/or coronary artery calcium score (CACS), could reduce the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs. However, the efficacy and safety of these approaches remain unclear.
Methods: Three diagnostic algorithms based on PTP, as summarised in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) CCS guidelines, were retrospectively applied to 1792 patients with suspected CCS referred for 82Rb-Positron Emission Tomography (82Rb-PET): (1) defer testing if PTP ≤5%; (2) defer if PTP <15%; and (3) defer if PTP ≤5% or PTP 5-15% and CACS 0. The proportion of missed ischemia, number of scans and reduction of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs were compared with the current gold standard (CACS+PET in every patient). Endpoints were defined as small ischemia (SDS ≥2) and relevant ischemia (≥10% of myocardium).
Results: The mean age of the patients was 65±11 years, and 43% were female. PTP ≤5% and <15% were present in 7.5% and 41.0%, respectively. Algorithm 1 reduced scans, radiation and costs by 7.5% without significantly missing ischemia (sensitivity/negative predictive value (NPV) 98.6%/99.7%). Algorithm 2 showed the largest reduction (41.0%), but sensitivity was significantly reduced (80.2%). Algorithm 3 demonstrated optimal performance, reducing radiation by 17.0% and costs by 17.3% without significantly missing ischemia suggesting excellent safety (sensitivity/NPV 98.0%/99.5%).
Conclusion: Using a diagnostic algorithm combining PTP and CACS (algorithm 3), the number of normal scan results, radiation exposure and costs could be significantly reduced without a significant increase in missed diagnoses suggesting similar outcome and excellent patients safety. Consequently, this approach could help to optimally allocate limited healthcare resources while maintaining patient's safety.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.