Isa F van Galen, Camila R Guetter, Elisa Caron, Jeremy Darling, Jemin Park, Roger B Davis, Mikayla Kricfalusi, Virendra I Patel, Joost A van Herwaarden, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Marc L Schermerhorn
{"title":"动脉瘤直径对复杂血管内修复术后围手术期预后的影响。","authors":"Isa F van Galen, Camila R Guetter, Elisa Caron, Jeremy Darling, Jemin Park, Roger B Davis, Mikayla Kricfalusi, Virendra I Patel, Joost A van Herwaarden, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Marc L Schermerhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for large infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been associated with worse outcomes compared to EVAR for smaller AAAs. Whether these findings apply to complex AAAs (cAAA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all intact complex EVAR (cEVAR) from 2012-2024 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. cEVAR was defined as having a proximal extent between zones 6-9 and at least one side branch/fenestration/chimney/parallel grafting. Aneurysm size was defined as follows: large: >65 mm (males), >60 mm (females); medium: 55-65 mm (males), 50-60 mm (females); and small: <55 mm (males), <50 mm (females). We assessed perioperative death, any complication, and in-hospital reintervention using logistic regression and mid-term mortality using adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. Medium-sized aneurysms were compared to large and small aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,426 patients, 22.6% had large, 60.4% medium, and 17.0% had small aneurysms. As compared to medium and small aneurysms, large aneurysms demonstrated higher rates of perioperative death (4.8% vs. 2.6% vs. 0.5%), any complication (33.3% vs. 23.6% vs. 19.4%), and in-hospital reintervention (6.2% vs. 4.0% vs. 2.6%) (all p<.05). Median follow-up was 445 days. One-year mortality rates were higher in large aneurysms (12.3% vs. 7.8% vs. 3.8%; p<.001). After adjustment, when compared with medium-sized aneurysms, large aneurysms were associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.09-2.72]), any complication (aOR, 1.44; [1.18-1.76]), and mid-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.50; [1.19-1.88]), but not in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 1.46; [0.99-2.13]). While small aneurysms, as compared with medium-sized aneurysms, did not demonstrate a difference in any complication (aOR, 0.87; [0.68-1.10]), in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 0.77; [0.42-1.33]), and mid-term mortality (aHR, 0.78; [0.57-1.08], they did demonstrate a lower risk of perioperative death (aOR, 0.26; [0.06-0.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cEVAR for cAAA, large aneurysms, compared with medium-sized aneurysms, were associated with higher rates of perioperative death, any complication, and mid-term mortality, with in-hospital reintervention trending toward a statistically significant higher risk. While these results align with expectations, they emphasize the importance of effectively managing patients with large cAAAs and highlight the need for future research to determine whether patients might benefit more from medical therapy or open repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Aneurysm Diameter on Perioperative Outcomes Following Complex Endovascular Repair.\",\"authors\":\"Isa F van Galen, Camila R Guetter, Elisa Caron, Jeremy Darling, Jemin Park, Roger B Davis, Mikayla Kricfalusi, Virendra I Patel, Joost A van Herwaarden, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Marc L Schermerhorn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for large infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been associated with worse outcomes compared to EVAR for smaller AAAs. Whether these findings apply to complex AAAs (cAAA) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all intact complex EVAR (cEVAR) from 2012-2024 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. cEVAR was defined as having a proximal extent between zones 6-9 and at least one side branch/fenestration/chimney/parallel grafting. Aneurysm size was defined as follows: large: >65 mm (males), >60 mm (females); medium: 55-65 mm (males), 50-60 mm (females); and small: <55 mm (males), <50 mm (females). We assessed perioperative death, any complication, and in-hospital reintervention using logistic regression and mid-term mortality using adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. Medium-sized aneurysms were compared to large and small aneurysms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,426 patients, 22.6% had large, 60.4% medium, and 17.0% had small aneurysms. As compared to medium and small aneurysms, large aneurysms demonstrated higher rates of perioperative death (4.8% vs. 2.6% vs. 0.5%), any complication (33.3% vs. 23.6% vs. 19.4%), and in-hospital reintervention (6.2% vs. 4.0% vs. 2.6%) (all p<.05). Median follow-up was 445 days. One-year mortality rates were higher in large aneurysms (12.3% vs. 7.8% vs. 3.8%; p<.001). After adjustment, when compared with medium-sized aneurysms, large aneurysms were associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.09-2.72]), any complication (aOR, 1.44; [1.18-1.76]), and mid-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.50; [1.19-1.88]), but not in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 1.46; [0.99-2.13]). While small aneurysms, as compared with medium-sized aneurysms, did not demonstrate a difference in any complication (aOR, 0.87; [0.68-1.10]), in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 0.77; [0.42-1.33]), and mid-term mortality (aHR, 0.78; [0.57-1.08], they did demonstrate a lower risk of perioperative death (aOR, 0.26; [0.06-0.71]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cEVAR for cAAA, large aneurysms, compared with medium-sized aneurysms, were associated with higher rates of perioperative death, any complication, and mid-term mortality, with in-hospital reintervention trending toward a statistically significant higher risk. While these results align with expectations, they emphasize the importance of effectively managing patients with large cAAAs and highlight the need for future research to determine whether patients might benefit more from medical therapy or open repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.129\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Aneurysm Diameter on Perioperative Outcomes Following Complex Endovascular Repair.
Objectives: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for large infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has been associated with worse outcomes compared to EVAR for smaller AAAs. Whether these findings apply to complex AAAs (cAAA) remains uncertain.
Methods: We identified all intact complex EVAR (cEVAR) from 2012-2024 in the Vascular Quality Initiative. cEVAR was defined as having a proximal extent between zones 6-9 and at least one side branch/fenestration/chimney/parallel grafting. Aneurysm size was defined as follows: large: >65 mm (males), >60 mm (females); medium: 55-65 mm (males), 50-60 mm (females); and small: <55 mm (males), <50 mm (females). We assessed perioperative death, any complication, and in-hospital reintervention using logistic regression and mid-term mortality using adjusted Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. Medium-sized aneurysms were compared to large and small aneurysms.
Results: Of 3,426 patients, 22.6% had large, 60.4% medium, and 17.0% had small aneurysms. As compared to medium and small aneurysms, large aneurysms demonstrated higher rates of perioperative death (4.8% vs. 2.6% vs. 0.5%), any complication (33.3% vs. 23.6% vs. 19.4%), and in-hospital reintervention (6.2% vs. 4.0% vs. 2.6%) (all p<.05). Median follow-up was 445 days. One-year mortality rates were higher in large aneurysms (12.3% vs. 7.8% vs. 3.8%; p<.001). After adjustment, when compared with medium-sized aneurysms, large aneurysms were associated with a significantly higher risk of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.09-2.72]), any complication (aOR, 1.44; [1.18-1.76]), and mid-term mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.50; [1.19-1.88]), but not in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 1.46; [0.99-2.13]). While small aneurysms, as compared with medium-sized aneurysms, did not demonstrate a difference in any complication (aOR, 0.87; [0.68-1.10]), in-hospital reintervention (aOR, 0.77; [0.42-1.33]), and mid-term mortality (aHR, 0.78; [0.57-1.08], they did demonstrate a lower risk of perioperative death (aOR, 0.26; [0.06-0.71]).
Conclusions: In cEVAR for cAAA, large aneurysms, compared with medium-sized aneurysms, were associated with higher rates of perioperative death, any complication, and mid-term mortality, with in-hospital reintervention trending toward a statistically significant higher risk. While these results align with expectations, they emphasize the importance of effectively managing patients with large cAAAs and highlight the need for future research to determine whether patients might benefit more from medical therapy or open repair.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.