传统、补充和结合医学在儿童姑息治疗患者疼痛和心理困扰管理中的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xingyue Wu, Chun Sing Lam, Yau Shing Chu, Weishang Deng, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Kwok Yin Au, Sze Shun Man, Chi Kong Li, Chenwen Zhong, Leonard Ho, Yin Ting Cheung
{"title":"传统、补充和结合医学在儿童姑息治疗患者疼痛和心理困扰管理中的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xingyue Wu, Chun Sing Lam, Yau Shing Chu, Weishang Deng, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Kwok Yin Au, Sze Shun Man, Chi Kong Li, Chenwen Zhong, Leonard Ho, Yin Ting Cheung","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is being increasingly used to manage symptoms in patients with palliative needs. However, there is a lack of evidence to guide its use in the pediatric palliative care (PPC) setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to synthesize and evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of TCIM in reducing pain and psychological distress in PPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four English electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2000 and August 2023. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report the pooled magnitude of the treatment effect. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of the evidence for each treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty RCTs were included. The interventions were massage (n = 9), music therapy (n = 6), hypnosis (n = 3), acupuncture, aromatherapy, and other TCIM modalities. Compared with the control interventions, music therapy significantly decreased pain (SMD: -1.07; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.50; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 72%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.75; 95% CI: -1.35 to -0.15; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 74%); massage significantly decreased pain (SMD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.02; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.61; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.01; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 71%). Hypnosis had significant effects on procedure-related anxiety, pain, and behavioral distress management (P < 0.05). The quality of evidence was rated as \"moderate\" for the efficacy of music therapy in alleviating pain and anxiety and \"low\" for the efficacy of all of the other interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing evidence supports the therapeutic benefits of music therapy, massage, and hypnosis on relieving pain and anxiety symptoms in the PPC setting, though the evidence is of low-to-moderate quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in Pain and Psychological Distress Management for Pediatric Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Xingyue Wu, Chun Sing Lam, Yau Shing Chu, Weishang Deng, Carmen Wing Han Chan, Kwok Yin Au, Sze Shun Man, Chi Kong Li, Chenwen Zhong, Leonard Ho, Yin Ting Cheung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is being increasingly used to manage symptoms in patients with palliative needs. However, there is a lack of evidence to guide its use in the pediatric palliative care (PPC) setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to synthesize and evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of TCIM in reducing pain and psychological distress in PPC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four English electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2000 and August 2023. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report the pooled magnitude of the treatment effect. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of the evidence for each treatment outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty RCTs were included. The interventions were massage (n = 9), music therapy (n = 6), hypnosis (n = 3), acupuncture, aromatherapy, and other TCIM modalities. Compared with the control interventions, music therapy significantly decreased pain (SMD: -1.07; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.50; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 72%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.75; 95% CI: -1.35 to -0.15; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 74%); massage significantly decreased pain (SMD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.02; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.61; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.01; P < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> = 71%). Hypnosis had significant effects on procedure-related anxiety, pain, and behavioral distress management (P < 0.05). The quality of evidence was rated as \\\"moderate\\\" for the efficacy of music therapy in alleviating pain and anxiety and \\\"low\\\" for the efficacy of all of the other interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Existing evidence supports the therapeutic benefits of music therapy, massage, and hypnosis on relieving pain and anxiety symptoms in the PPC setting, though the evidence is of low-to-moderate quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.01.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统、补充和综合医学(TCIM)越来越多地被用于控制有姑息治疗需求的患者的症状。然而,在儿科姑息治疗(PPC)环境中,缺乏指导其使用的证据:本研究旨在综合并评估 TCIM 在减轻儿科姑息治疗患者疼痛和心理压力方面的有效性的现有证据:方法:在四个英文电子数据库中检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 8 月间发表的随机对照试验 (RCT)。采用标准化平均差(SMD)来报告治疗效果的总和。采用 "建议评估、发展和评价分级系统 "评估每项治疗结果的证据质量:结果:共纳入了 30 项 RCT。干预措施包括按摩(9 项)、音乐疗法(6 项)、催眠(3 项)、针灸、芳香疗法和其他 TCIM 方式。与对照干预相比,音乐疗法能明显减轻疼痛(SMD:-1.07;95% CI:-1.64 至 -0.50;P < 0.05;I2 = 72%),缓解焦虑(SMD:-0.75;95% CI:-1.35 至 -0.15;P < 0.05;I2 = 72%)。15;P < 0.05;I2 = 74%);按摩显著减轻疼痛(SMD:-0.74;95% CI:-1.46 至 -0.02;P < 0.05;I2 = 83%)并缓解焦虑(SMD:-0.61;95% CI:-1.21 至 -0.01;P < 0.05;I2 = 71%)。催眠对手术相关的焦虑、疼痛和行为困扰管理有显著效果(P < 0.05)。音乐疗法在减轻疼痛和焦虑方面的疗效被评为 "中等",所有其他干预措施的疗效被评为 "低":现有证据支持音乐疗法、按摩和催眠对缓解 PPC 环境中的疼痛和焦虑症状有治疗效果,但证据质量为中低水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine in Pain and Psychological Distress Management for Pediatric Palliative Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Context: Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) is being increasingly used to manage symptoms in patients with palliative needs. However, there is a lack of evidence to guide its use in the pediatric palliative care (PPC) setting.

Objectives: This study aimed to synthesize and evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of TCIM in reducing pain and psychological distress in PPC.

Methods: Four English electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2000 and August 2023. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to report the pooled magnitude of the treatment effect. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of the evidence for each treatment outcome.

Results: Thirty RCTs were included. The interventions were massage (n = 9), music therapy (n = 6), hypnosis (n = 3), acupuncture, aromatherapy, and other TCIM modalities. Compared with the control interventions, music therapy significantly decreased pain (SMD: -1.07; 95% CI: -1.64 to -0.50; P < 0.05; I2 = 72%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.75; 95% CI: -1.35 to -0.15; P < 0.05; I2 = 74%); massage significantly decreased pain (SMD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.02; P < 0.05; I2 = 83%) and relieved anxiety (SMD: -0.61; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.01; P < 0.05; I2 = 71%). Hypnosis had significant effects on procedure-related anxiety, pain, and behavioral distress management (P < 0.05). The quality of evidence was rated as "moderate" for the efficacy of music therapy in alleviating pain and anxiety and "low" for the efficacy of all of the other interventions.

Conclusions: Existing evidence supports the therapeutic benefits of music therapy, massage, and hypnosis on relieving pain and anxiety symptoms in the PPC setting, though the evidence is of low-to-moderate quality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信