{"title":"推进外科教育:对医学生腹腔镜模拟训练的评价。","authors":"Wenbin Zhang MD, Lijun Qu MD, PhD, Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu PhD, Yuanyuan Xu MD, Meiying Chen MD, Guangyin Yu PhD, Xuefeng Zheng MD, PhD, Guoqing Guo MD, PhD, Jifeng Zhang MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jep.14225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Medical students in year three (<i>n</i> = 49) participated in laparoscopic simulation training sessions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Before the simulation training, 85.7% of students were unaware of laparoscopy, with females being less familiar than males (96.3% vs. 72.8%). 85.7% believed mastering laparoscopy was crucial before training, and 81.6% believed simulation training could enhance surgical skills. A disparity existed in this belief between the sexes, with 91% of males and 74.1% of females seeing the value in such training for skill improvement. Pretraining, males (54.5%) were more confident than females (26%) in mastering laparoscopy. Post-training, confidence increased for both groups, and the percentage of students wishing to pursue a surgical career also rose from 50% to 72.7%. Despite initial disparities in the time spent on training modules between males and females, both groups achieved similar proficiency levels by the end of the training. Although females initially lagged in spatial awareness and skills, post-training results showed significant improvement, matching their male counterparts. 26.5% of students experienced physical fatigue post-training, with a higher percentage of females (33.3%) reporting fatigue than males (18.2%). Regarding concentration during simulations, 81.8% of males could maintain focus compared to 48.2% of females.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Laparoscopic simulation training effectively improved the understanding, confidence, and surgical skills of medical students, with evident benefits in shaping their career aspirations. While both genders exhibited significant gains, female students faced challenges in terms of physical tolerance and initial spatial awareness. However, their post-training achievements mirrored those of their male peers, highlighting the effectiveness and importance of such simulation training programmes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advancing surgical education: An evaluation of laparoscopic simulation training for medical students\",\"authors\":\"Wenbin Zhang MD, Lijun Qu MD, PhD, Prince Last Mudenda Zilundu PhD, Yuanyuan Xu MD, Meiying Chen MD, Guangyin Yu PhD, Xuefeng Zheng MD, PhD, Guoqing Guo MD, PhD, Jifeng Zhang MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.14225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Participants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Medical students in year three (<i>n</i> = 49) participated in laparoscopic simulation training sessions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Before the simulation training, 85.7% of students were unaware of laparoscopy, with females being less familiar than males (96.3% vs. 72.8%). 85.7% believed mastering laparoscopy was crucial before training, and 81.6% believed simulation training could enhance surgical skills. A disparity existed in this belief between the sexes, with 91% of males and 74.1% of females seeing the value in such training for skill improvement. Pretraining, males (54.5%) were more confident than females (26%) in mastering laparoscopy. Post-training, confidence increased for both groups, and the percentage of students wishing to pursue a surgical career also rose from 50% to 72.7%. Despite initial disparities in the time spent on training modules between males and females, both groups achieved similar proficiency levels by the end of the training. Although females initially lagged in spatial awareness and skills, post-training results showed significant improvement, matching their male counterparts. 26.5% of students experienced physical fatigue post-training, with a higher percentage of females (33.3%) reporting fatigue than males (18.2%). Regarding concentration during simulations, 81.8% of males could maintain focus compared to 48.2% of females.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Laparoscopic simulation training effectively improved the understanding, confidence, and surgical skills of medical students, with evident benefits in shaping their career aspirations. While both genders exhibited significant gains, female students faced challenges in terms of physical tolerance and initial spatial awareness. However, their post-training achievements mirrored those of their male peers, highlighting the effectiveness and importance of such simulation training programmes.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.14225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advancing surgical education: An evaluation of laparoscopic simulation training for medical students
Objective
To examine the medical students' awareness of laparoscopic surgery as well as assess the perceived importance of laparoscopic simulation training, and its impact on students' confidence, career aspirations, proficiency, spatial skills, and physical tolerance.
Design
Descriptive and comparative study using pre- and post-training assessments.
Setting
Simulation training sessions centred on laparoscopic surgery techniques.
Participants
Medical students in year three (n = 49) participated in laparoscopic simulation training sessions.
Results
Before the simulation training, 85.7% of students were unaware of laparoscopy, with females being less familiar than males (96.3% vs. 72.8%). 85.7% believed mastering laparoscopy was crucial before training, and 81.6% believed simulation training could enhance surgical skills. A disparity existed in this belief between the sexes, with 91% of males and 74.1% of females seeing the value in such training for skill improvement. Pretraining, males (54.5%) were more confident than females (26%) in mastering laparoscopy. Post-training, confidence increased for both groups, and the percentage of students wishing to pursue a surgical career also rose from 50% to 72.7%. Despite initial disparities in the time spent on training modules between males and females, both groups achieved similar proficiency levels by the end of the training. Although females initially lagged in spatial awareness and skills, post-training results showed significant improvement, matching their male counterparts. 26.5% of students experienced physical fatigue post-training, with a higher percentage of females (33.3%) reporting fatigue than males (18.2%). Regarding concentration during simulations, 81.8% of males could maintain focus compared to 48.2% of females.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic simulation training effectively improved the understanding, confidence, and surgical skills of medical students, with evident benefits in shaping their career aspirations. While both genders exhibited significant gains, female students faced challenges in terms of physical tolerance and initial spatial awareness. However, their post-training achievements mirrored those of their male peers, highlighting the effectiveness and importance of such simulation training programmes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.