后路碳纤维植入物在脊柱肿瘤手术中的作用。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge, Robert North, Claudio Tatsui, Naresh Kumar, Sheng-Fu Lo, Karim Mohammed, Jeremy Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Ilya Laufer, Jorrit Jan Verlaan, Ziya Gokaslan, Alessandro Luzzati, Riccardo Cecchinato, John Shin, Francis Hornicek, Alexander Disch, Matthew Goodwin, Rory Goodwin, Arjun Sahgal, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Stefano Boriani
{"title":"后路碳纤维植入物在脊柱肿瘤手术中的作用。","authors":"Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge, Robert North, Claudio Tatsui, Naresh Kumar, Sheng-Fu Lo, Karim Mohammed, Jeremy Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Ilya Laufer, Jorrit Jan Verlaan, Ziya Gokaslan, Alessandro Luzzati, Riccardo Cecchinato, John Shin, Francis Hornicek, Alexander Disch, Matthew Goodwin, Rory Goodwin, Arjun Sahgal, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Stefano Boriani","doi":"10.1177/21925682241259778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative Review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The management of spinal tumors requires a multi-disciplinary approach including surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. Surgical approaches typically require posterior segmental instrumentation to maintain long-term spinal stability. Carbon fiber reinforced pedicle screws (CFRP) are increasingly used in the oncologic setting due to reductions in both imaging artifacts and radiotherapy perturbations compared to titanium implants. We performed a review of the literature and highlight advantages and future areas of study for CFRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and identified 10 articles including 573 patients. Across all studies we reviewed patient demographics, tumor types treated, hardware-related features, complication rates, recurrence, survival, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 10 studies, a total of 1371 screws placed. Surgical and non-surgical complications were reported in 18.3% of patients. Disease progression at the surgical site was detected in 7.3% of patients. There was no significant difference in clinical or hardware complications between CFRP or titanium implants. The most frequent complication attributable to implanted CFRP hardware included screw breakage in 2.4% and loosening in 1.7% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CFRP provide a unique tool in the setting of spinal oncology. With a safety profile comparable to titanium, we review the documented advantages of CFRP posterior implants compared to titanium, while also addressing their current limitations. Additionally, we highlight several areas of future research to identify the optimal patients who will achieve the greatest benefit of CFRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":"15 1_suppl","pages":"157S-165S"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Posterior Carbon Fiber Implants in Spine Tumor Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher A Alvarez-Breckenridge, Robert North, Claudio Tatsui, Naresh Kumar, Sheng-Fu Lo, Karim Mohammed, Jeremy Reynolds, Aron Lazary, Ilya Laufer, Jorrit Jan Verlaan, Ziya Gokaslan, Alessandro Luzzati, Riccardo Cecchinato, John Shin, Francis Hornicek, Alexander Disch, Matthew Goodwin, Rory Goodwin, Arjun Sahgal, Alessandro Gasbarrini, Stefano Boriani\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241259778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Narrative Review.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The management of spinal tumors requires a multi-disciplinary approach including surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. Surgical approaches typically require posterior segmental instrumentation to maintain long-term spinal stability. Carbon fiber reinforced pedicle screws (CFRP) are increasingly used in the oncologic setting due to reductions in both imaging artifacts and radiotherapy perturbations compared to titanium implants. We performed a review of the literature and highlight advantages and future areas of study for CFRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and identified 10 articles including 573 patients. Across all studies we reviewed patient demographics, tumor types treated, hardware-related features, complication rates, recurrence, survival, and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 10 studies, a total of 1371 screws placed. Surgical and non-surgical complications were reported in 18.3% of patients. Disease progression at the surgical site was detected in 7.3% of patients. There was no significant difference in clinical or hardware complications between CFRP or titanium implants. The most frequent complication attributable to implanted CFRP hardware included screw breakage in 2.4% and loosening in 1.7% of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CFRP provide a unique tool in the setting of spinal oncology. With a safety profile comparable to titanium, we review the documented advantages of CFRP posterior implants compared to titanium, while also addressing their current limitations. Additionally, we highlight several areas of future research to identify the optimal patients who will achieve the greatest benefit of CFRP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\"15 1_suppl\",\"pages\":\"157S-165S\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241259778\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241259778","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:叙述性回顾。目的:脊柱肿瘤的治疗需要多学科的方法,包括手术、放疗和全身治疗。手术入路通常需要后路内固定以维持脊柱的长期稳定。碳纤维增强椎弓根螺钉(CFRP)越来越多地用于肿瘤治疗,因为与钛植入物相比,它可以减少成像伪影和放疗干扰。我们对文献进行了回顾,并强调了碳纤维增强塑料的优势和未来的研究领域。方法:我们使用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目对文献进行了系统评价,并确定了10篇文章,包括573名患者。在所有的研究中,我们回顾了患者的人口统计、治疗的肿瘤类型、硬件相关特征、并发症发生率、复发率、生存率和随访。结果:在10项研究中,总共放置了1371枚螺钉。18.3%的患者出现手术和非手术并发症。7.3%的患者在手术部位发现疾病进展。CFRP与钛种植体在临床或硬件并发症方面无显著差异。植入CFRP硬体最常见的并发症包括螺钉断裂(2.4%)和松动(1.7%)。结论:CFRP为脊柱肿瘤治疗提供了一种独特的工具。由于CFRP后路植入物的安全性与钛相当,我们回顾了CFRP后路植入物与钛相比的文献优势,同时也指出了其目前的局限性。此外,我们强调了未来研究的几个领域,以确定将获得CFRP最大益处的最佳患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of Posterior Carbon Fiber Implants in Spine Tumor Surgery.

Study design: Narrative Review.

Objective: The management of spinal tumors requires a multi-disciplinary approach including surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy. Surgical approaches typically require posterior segmental instrumentation to maintain long-term spinal stability. Carbon fiber reinforced pedicle screws (CFRP) are increasingly used in the oncologic setting due to reductions in both imaging artifacts and radiotherapy perturbations compared to titanium implants. We performed a review of the literature and highlight advantages and future areas of study for CFRP.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and identified 10 articles including 573 patients. Across all studies we reviewed patient demographics, tumor types treated, hardware-related features, complication rates, recurrence, survival, and follow-up.

Results: Across 10 studies, a total of 1371 screws placed. Surgical and non-surgical complications were reported in 18.3% of patients. Disease progression at the surgical site was detected in 7.3% of patients. There was no significant difference in clinical or hardware complications between CFRP or titanium implants. The most frequent complication attributable to implanted CFRP hardware included screw breakage in 2.4% and loosening in 1.7% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion: CFRP provide a unique tool in the setting of spinal oncology. With a safety profile comparable to titanium, we review the documented advantages of CFRP posterior implants compared to titanium, while also addressing their current limitations. Additionally, we highlight several areas of future research to identify the optimal patients who will achieve the greatest benefit of CFRP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信