非药物干预对孕妇抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103011
Guowei Zeng, Jianfeng Niu, Ke Zhu, Fei Li, Liwen Li, Kaiming Gao, Yanlong Zhuang, Boyang Zhang, Xiaoqiang Han, Gang Ye, Zhikun Gao, Haobai Li
{"title":"非药物干预对孕妇抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Guowei Zeng, Jianfeng Niu, Ke Zhu, Fei Li, Liwen Li, Kaiming Gao, Yanlong Zhuang, Boyang Zhang, Xiaoqiang Han, Gang Ye, Zhikun Gao, Haobai Li","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the distinctive physiological characteristics of pregnant women, non-pharmacological therapies are increasingly being used to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Our objective was to explore and compare the impact of various non-pharmacological interventions in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms, and to identify the most effective strategies for pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared non-pharmacological interventions to usual care, from the inception of each database up to October 5, 2024. We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who, at baseline, exhibited early signs of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms but did not meet clinical diagnostic criteria or exceed the threshold for clinically significant symptoms. We excluded pregnant women diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe acute psychiatric conditions, those with a history of substance abuse, and those undergoing in vitro fertilisation. We performed both pairwise meta-analyses and random-effects network meta-analyses (NMAs), calculating standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) to estimate treatment ranking probabilities. The outcomes were assessed in two groups of participants: a high-risk pregnancy group, including pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms and high-risk pregnancies (defined as having a history of miscarriage, pregnancy complications such as gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, or preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age (i.e., over 35 years old); and a healthy group, including participants who exhibited depressive and/or anxiety symptoms only during pregnancy and did not have other high-risk pregnancy conditions or underlying health issues. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024523053.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 101 studies (92 RCTs and 9 quasi-RCTs) involving a total of 15,330 participants across 11 interventions (mindfulness, education, counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, muscle acupoint therapy, relaxation, mind-body exercise, psychotherapy, foetal movement counting, physical exercise, and music). Among the studies included in this analysis, 73 studies exhibited a low risk of bias, 9 studies had an unclear risk of bias, and 19 studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. The results indicate that, for both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations, mindfulness therapy was found to be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for significantly improving depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women compared with control groups. For pregnant women with depressive symptoms, mindfulness therapy (SUCRA = 80%; SMD = -0.86, 95% CrI = -1.2, -0.52; Nn = 598), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (SUCRA = 65%; SMD = -0.69, 95% CrI = -1.0, -0.39; Nn = 712), and education therapy (SUCRA = 48%; SMD = -0.54, 95% CrI = -0.86, -0.23; Nn = 2285) all significantly improve depressive symptoms. In the subgroup analysis of healthy populations, muscle acupoint therapy (SUCRA = 77.17%; SMD = -0.89, 95% CrI = -1.55, -0.23; N = 99) and mind-body exercise (SUCRA = 47.54%; SMD = -0.53, 95% CrI = -0.88, -0.19; N = 352) also significantly reduce depressive symptoms. Subgroup analysis shows that, in addition to mindfulness therapy, mind-body exercises (SUCRA = 67.43%; SMD = -0.97, 95% CrI = -1.61, -0.33; N = 382) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (SUCRA = 52.60%; SMD = -0.74, 95% CrI = -1.38, -0.09; N = 480) may also be effective in alleviating anxiety symptoms among healthy pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that mindfulness therapy significantly reduces the risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms in both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations. Therefore, when selecting non-pharmacologic therapies for managing depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy, it is recommended that this therapy be considered. We cannot overlook the limitations of this study. For example, some interventions, such as muscle acupoint therapy for depressive symptoms and relaxation therapy for anxiety symptoms, have limited literature support. Additionally, the diversity of conditions within the high-risk pregnancy population and the high heterogeneity observed in certain interventions are also issues that require attention. These factors may affect the accuracy of the data results. Although we have employed reliable methods to address these issues, the findings of this study should still be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"103011"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guowei Zeng, Jianfeng Niu, Ke Zhu, Fei Li, Liwen Li, Kaiming Gao, Yanlong Zhuang, Boyang Zhang, Xiaoqiang Han, Gang Ye, Zhikun Gao, Haobai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the distinctive physiological characteristics of pregnant women, non-pharmacological therapies are increasingly being used to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Our objective was to explore and compare the impact of various non-pharmacological interventions in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms, and to identify the most effective strategies for pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared non-pharmacological interventions to usual care, from the inception of each database up to October 5, 2024. We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who, at baseline, exhibited early signs of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms but did not meet clinical diagnostic criteria or exceed the threshold for clinically significant symptoms. We excluded pregnant women diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe acute psychiatric conditions, those with a history of substance abuse, and those undergoing in vitro fertilisation. We performed both pairwise meta-analyses and random-effects network meta-analyses (NMAs), calculating standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) to estimate treatment ranking probabilities. The outcomes were assessed in two groups of participants: a high-risk pregnancy group, including pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms and high-risk pregnancies (defined as having a history of miscarriage, pregnancy complications such as gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, or preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age (i.e., over 35 years old); and a healthy group, including participants who exhibited depressive and/or anxiety symptoms only during pregnancy and did not have other high-risk pregnancy conditions or underlying health issues. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024523053.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 101 studies (92 RCTs and 9 quasi-RCTs) involving a total of 15,330 participants across 11 interventions (mindfulness, education, counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, muscle acupoint therapy, relaxation, mind-body exercise, psychotherapy, foetal movement counting, physical exercise, and music). Among the studies included in this analysis, 73 studies exhibited a low risk of bias, 9 studies had an unclear risk of bias, and 19 studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. The results indicate that, for both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations, mindfulness therapy was found to be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for significantly improving depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women compared with control groups. For pregnant women with depressive symptoms, mindfulness therapy (SUCRA = 80%; SMD = -0.86, 95% CrI = -1.2, -0.52; Nn = 598), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (SUCRA = 65%; SMD = -0.69, 95% CrI = -1.0, -0.39; Nn = 712), and education therapy (SUCRA = 48%; SMD = -0.54, 95% CrI = -0.86, -0.23; Nn = 2285) all significantly improve depressive symptoms. In the subgroup analysis of healthy populations, muscle acupoint therapy (SUCRA = 77.17%; SMD = -0.89, 95% CrI = -1.55, -0.23; N = 99) and mind-body exercise (SUCRA = 47.54%; SMD = -0.53, 95% CrI = -0.88, -0.19; N = 352) also significantly reduce depressive symptoms. Subgroup analysis shows that, in addition to mindfulness therapy, mind-body exercises (SUCRA = 67.43%; SMD = -0.97, 95% CrI = -1.61, -0.33; N = 382) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (SUCRA = 52.60%; SMD = -0.74, 95% CrI = -1.38, -0.09; N = 480) may also be effective in alleviating anxiety symptoms among healthy pregnant women.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our findings indicate that mindfulness therapy significantly reduces the risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms in both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations. Therefore, when selecting non-pharmacologic therapies for managing depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy, it is recommended that this therapy be considered. We cannot overlook the limitations of this study. For example, some interventions, such as muscle acupoint therapy for depressive symptoms and relaxation therapy for anxiety symptoms, have limited literature support. Additionally, the diversity of conditions within the high-risk pregnancy population and the high heterogeneity observed in certain interventions are also issues that require attention. These factors may affect the accuracy of the data results. Although we have employed reliable methods to address these issues, the findings of this study should still be interpreted with caution.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"103011\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11718295/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103011\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于孕妇独特的生理特点,非药物疗法正越来越多地被用于改善孕妇的抑郁和焦虑症状。我们的目的是探索和比较各种非药物干预对改善抑郁和焦虑症状的影响,并找出对有抑郁和/或焦虑症状的孕妇最有效的策略:我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science 进行了系统性检索,以寻找从各数据库建立之初到 2024 年 10 月 5 日期间,将非药物干预与常规护理进行比较的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们纳入了单胎妊娠的孕妇,她们在基线时表现出抑郁和/或焦虑症状的早期迹象,但未达到临床诊断标准或超过临床显著症状的阈值。我们排除了被诊断患有精神分裂症、双相情感障碍或严重急性精神病的孕妇、有药物滥用史的孕妇以及接受体外受精的孕妇。我们进行了配对荟萃分析和随机效应网络荟萃分析(NMA),计算了标准化均值差异(SMD)和 95% 可信区间(CrI)。我们使用累积排序概率曲线下表面(SUCRA)来估算治疗排序概率。结果在两组参与者中进行评估:高危妊娠组,包括有抑郁和/或焦虑症状和高危妊娠的孕妇(定义为有流产史、妊娠并发症,如妊娠高血压、妊娠糖尿病或子痫前期,以及高龄产妇(即 35 岁以上));健康组,包括仅在妊娠期间表现出抑郁和/或焦虑症状,且没有其他高危妊娠症状或潜在健康问题的参与者。本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册,注册号为 CRD42024523053:我们共纳入了 101 项研究(92 项 RCT 和 9 项准 RCT),涉及 11 种干预措施(正念、教育、咨询、认知行为疗法、肌肉穴位疗法、放松、身心锻炼、心理疗法、胎动计数、体育锻炼和音乐),共计 15,330 名参与者。在纳入分析的研究中,73 项研究的偏倚风险较低,9 项研究的偏倚风险不明确,19 项研究的偏倚风险较高。结果表明,对于高危妊娠人群和健康人群,与对照组相比,正念疗法是一种有效的非药物疗法,能显著改善孕妇的抑郁和焦虑症状。对于有抑郁症状的孕妇,正念疗法(SUCRA = 80%;SMD = -0.86,95% CrI = -1.2, -0.52;Nn = 598)、认知行为疗法(CBT)(SUCRA = 65%;SMD = -0.69,95% CrI = -1.0, -0.39;Nn = 712)和教育疗法(SUCRA = 48%;SMD = -0.54,95% CrI = -0.86, -0.23;Nn = 2285)都能显著改善抑郁症状。在健康人群的亚组分析中,肌肉穴位疗法(SUCRA = 77.17%;SMD = -0.89,95% CrI = -1.55,-0.23;N = 99)和身心锻炼(SUCRA = 47.54%;SMD = -0.53,95% CrI = -0.88,-0.19;N = 352)也能明显减轻抑郁症状。分组分析表明,除正念疗法外,身心锻炼(SUCRA = 67.43%;SMD = -0.97,95% CrI = -1.61, -0.33;N = 382)和认知行为疗法(SUCRA = 52.60%;SMD = -0.74,95% CrI = -1.38, -0.09;N = 480)也可有效缓解健康孕妇的焦虑症状:我们的研究结果表明,正念疗法能显著降低高危妊娠人群和健康人群出现抑郁和焦虑症状的风险。因此,在选择非药物疗法来控制孕期抑郁和焦虑症状时,建议考虑这种疗法。我们不能忽视这项研究的局限性。例如,一些干预措施,如针对抑郁症状的肌肉穴位疗法和针对焦虑症状的放松疗法,只有有限的文献支持。此外,高危妊娠人群病情的多样性和某些干预措施的高度异质性也是需要注意的问题。这些因素可能会影响数据结果的准确性。尽管我们采用了可靠的方法来解决这些问题,但在解释本研究结果时仍需谨慎:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Given the distinctive physiological characteristics of pregnant women, non-pharmacological therapies are increasingly being used to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Our objective was to explore and compare the impact of various non-pharmacological interventions in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms, and to identify the most effective strategies for pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared non-pharmacological interventions to usual care, from the inception of each database up to October 5, 2024. We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who, at baseline, exhibited early signs of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms but did not meet clinical diagnostic criteria or exceed the threshold for clinically significant symptoms. We excluded pregnant women diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe acute psychiatric conditions, those with a history of substance abuse, and those undergoing in vitro fertilisation. We performed both pairwise meta-analyses and random-effects network meta-analyses (NMAs), calculating standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) to estimate treatment ranking probabilities. The outcomes were assessed in two groups of participants: a high-risk pregnancy group, including pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms and high-risk pregnancies (defined as having a history of miscarriage, pregnancy complications such as gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, or preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age (i.e., over 35 years old); and a healthy group, including participants who exhibited depressive and/or anxiety symptoms only during pregnancy and did not have other high-risk pregnancy conditions or underlying health issues. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024523053.

Findings: We included 101 studies (92 RCTs and 9 quasi-RCTs) involving a total of 15,330 participants across 11 interventions (mindfulness, education, counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, muscle acupoint therapy, relaxation, mind-body exercise, psychotherapy, foetal movement counting, physical exercise, and music). Among the studies included in this analysis, 73 studies exhibited a low risk of bias, 9 studies had an unclear risk of bias, and 19 studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. The results indicate that, for both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations, mindfulness therapy was found to be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for significantly improving depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women compared with control groups. For pregnant women with depressive symptoms, mindfulness therapy (SUCRA = 80%; SMD = -0.86, 95% CrI = -1.2, -0.52; Nn = 598), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (SUCRA = 65%; SMD = -0.69, 95% CrI = -1.0, -0.39; Nn = 712), and education therapy (SUCRA = 48%; SMD = -0.54, 95% CrI = -0.86, -0.23; Nn = 2285) all significantly improve depressive symptoms. In the subgroup analysis of healthy populations, muscle acupoint therapy (SUCRA = 77.17%; SMD = -0.89, 95% CrI = -1.55, -0.23; N = 99) and mind-body exercise (SUCRA = 47.54%; SMD = -0.53, 95% CrI = -0.88, -0.19; N = 352) also significantly reduce depressive symptoms. Subgroup analysis shows that, in addition to mindfulness therapy, mind-body exercises (SUCRA = 67.43%; SMD = -0.97, 95% CrI = -1.61, -0.33; N = 382) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (SUCRA = 52.60%; SMD = -0.74, 95% CrI = -1.38, -0.09; N = 480) may also be effective in alleviating anxiety symptoms among healthy pregnant women.

Interpretation: Our findings indicate that mindfulness therapy significantly reduces the risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms in both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations. Therefore, when selecting non-pharmacologic therapies for managing depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy, it is recommended that this therapy be considered. We cannot overlook the limitations of this study. For example, some interventions, such as muscle acupoint therapy for depressive symptoms and relaxation therapy for anxiety symptoms, have limited literature support. Additionally, the diversity of conditions within the high-risk pregnancy population and the high heterogeneity observed in certain interventions are also issues that require attention. These factors may affect the accuracy of the data results. Although we have employed reliable methods to address these issues, the findings of this study should still be interpreted with caution.

Funding: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信