一种新型的动态生长棒诱导脊柱生长调节以矫正脊柱畸形。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
JOR Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.70031
Yangyang Xu, Da Lu, Le Zhang, Shijia Zhang, Yong Wu, Heng Li, Baoqing Pei, Xueqing Wu
{"title":"一种新型的动态生长棒诱导脊柱生长调节以矫正脊柱畸形。","authors":"Yangyang Xu,&nbsp;Da Lu,&nbsp;Le Zhang,&nbsp;Shijia Zhang,&nbsp;Yong Wu,&nbsp;Heng Li,&nbsp;Baoqing Pei,&nbsp;Xueqing Wu","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Growth rods are the gold standard for treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, current treatments with growth rods do not optimize spinal growth in EOS patients, and frequent distraction surgeries significantly increase complications, imposing considerable economic and psychological burdens on patients. An improved growth rod is urgently required to address the need for dynamic growth and external regulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study designed a novel growth rod (NGR) with unidirectional sliding and external regulation capabilities. By establishing a three-dimensional model of the EOS spine, we simulated the implantation of traditional growth rods (TGR) and NGR. We applied a compressive load of 400 N to test axial stiffness and a moment of 1 NM to assess bending stiffness under six different conditions. Additionally, we evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the spinal joints, and the distribution of Von Mises stress in vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and the growth rods, and calculated the axial force, moment, fatigue life, and strain energy of the device.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>NGR exhibits higher axial compression and torsional stiffness than TGR and the Intact group. Additionally, Von Mises stress values for NGR are higher than those for TGR across all operating conditions, albeit with slightly lower total strain energy than TGR. Although Von Mises stress in NGR concentrates near the screw fixation, the fatigue life remains adequate for basic living requirements.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, NGR demonstrates superior stiffness and stress distribution. NGR's distraction-based implant features a unidirectional sliding component with a spring-driven mechanism for dynamic correction and a novel non-invasive extension mechanism to reduce infections. Compared to leading EOS implants, NGR offers improved stability, showing promise for enhancing EOS surgical interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Dynamic Growth Rod Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities\",\"authors\":\"Yangyang Xu,&nbsp;Da Lu,&nbsp;Le Zhang,&nbsp;Shijia Zhang,&nbsp;Yong Wu,&nbsp;Heng Li,&nbsp;Baoqing Pei,&nbsp;Xueqing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jsp2.70031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Growth rods are the gold standard for treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, current treatments with growth rods do not optimize spinal growth in EOS patients, and frequent distraction surgeries significantly increase complications, imposing considerable economic and psychological burdens on patients. An improved growth rod is urgently required to address the need for dynamic growth and external regulation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study designed a novel growth rod (NGR) with unidirectional sliding and external regulation capabilities. By establishing a three-dimensional model of the EOS spine, we simulated the implantation of traditional growth rods (TGR) and NGR. We applied a compressive load of 400 N to test axial stiffness and a moment of 1 NM to assess bending stiffness under six different conditions. Additionally, we evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the spinal joints, and the distribution of Von Mises stress in vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and the growth rods, and calculated the axial force, moment, fatigue life, and strain energy of the device.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>NGR exhibits higher axial compression and torsional stiffness than TGR and the Intact group. Additionally, Von Mises stress values for NGR are higher than those for TGR across all operating conditions, albeit with slightly lower total strain energy than TGR. Although Von Mises stress in NGR concentrates near the screw fixation, the fatigue life remains adequate for basic living requirements.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, NGR demonstrates superior stiffness and stress distribution. NGR's distraction-based implant features a unidirectional sliding component with a spring-driven mechanism for dynamic correction and a novel non-invasive extension mechanism to reduce infections. Compared to leading EOS implants, NGR offers improved stability, showing promise for enhancing EOS surgical interventions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOR Spine\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11720242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOR Spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生长棒是治疗早发脊柱侧凸(EOS)的金标准。然而,目前使用生长棒的治疗方法并不能优化 EOS 患者的脊柱生长,频繁的牵引手术大大增加了并发症,给患者造成了相当大的经济和心理负担。目前迫切需要一种改进的生长棒,以满足动态生长和外部调节的需要:本研究设计了一种具有单向滑动和外部调节功能的新型生长棒(NGR)。通过建立 EOS 脊柱的三维模型,我们模拟了传统生长棒(TGR)和 NGR 的植入过程。我们施加了 400 N 的压缩载荷来测试轴向刚度,并施加了 1 NM 的力矩来评估六种不同条件下的弯曲刚度。此外,我们还评估了脊柱关节的运动范围(ROM),以及椎骨、椎间盘和生长棒的 Von Mises 应力分布,并计算了该装置的轴向力、力矩、疲劳寿命和应变能:结果:NGR 比 TGR 和完好组显示出更高的轴向压缩和扭转刚度。此外,在所有工作条件下,NGR 的 Von Mises 应力值均高于 TGR,尽管总应变能略低于 TGR。虽然 NGR 的 Von Mises 应力集中在螺钉固定处附近,但其疲劳寿命仍足以满足基本生活要求:总的来说,NGR 在刚度和应力分布方面都表现出众。NGR 的牵张型植入物具有单向滑动组件,弹簧驱动机制可实现动态校正,新颖的非侵入式伸展机制可减少感染。与主要的 EOS 植入体相比,NGR 具有更高的稳定性,有望加强 EOS 手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Novel Dynamic Growth Rod Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities

A Novel Dynamic Growth Rod Inducing Spinal Growth Modulation for the Correction of Spinal Deformities

Background

Growth rods are the gold standard for treating early-onset scoliosis (EOS). However, current treatments with growth rods do not optimize spinal growth in EOS patients, and frequent distraction surgeries significantly increase complications, imposing considerable economic and psychological burdens on patients. An improved growth rod is urgently required to address the need for dynamic growth and external regulation.

Methods

This study designed a novel growth rod (NGR) with unidirectional sliding and external regulation capabilities. By establishing a three-dimensional model of the EOS spine, we simulated the implantation of traditional growth rods (TGR) and NGR. We applied a compressive load of 400 N to test axial stiffness and a moment of 1 NM to assess bending stiffness under six different conditions. Additionally, we evaluated the range of motion (ROM) of the spinal joints, and the distribution of Von Mises stress in vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and the growth rods, and calculated the axial force, moment, fatigue life, and strain energy of the device.

Results

NGR exhibits higher axial compression and torsional stiffness than TGR and the Intact group. Additionally, Von Mises stress values for NGR are higher than those for TGR across all operating conditions, albeit with slightly lower total strain energy than TGR. Although Von Mises stress in NGR concentrates near the screw fixation, the fatigue life remains adequate for basic living requirements.

Conclusion

Overall, NGR demonstrates superior stiffness and stress distribution. NGR's distraction-based implant features a unidirectional sliding component with a spring-driven mechanism for dynamic correction and a novel non-invasive extension mechanism to reduce infections. Compared to leading EOS implants, NGR offers improved stability, showing promise for enhancing EOS surgical interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信